Background: Glucose derangement has been reported to increase oxidative stress, one of the most important factors underlying the progression of hepatic fibrosis in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To date, careful evaluation of the glucose profile in pediatric NAFLD has not been performed. Methods: A total of 30 severely obese children (15 males; mean age 12.87 ± 2.19 years) with biopsy-proven NAFLD were enrolled in this study from September to December 2013. All patients underwent anthropometric and laboratory evaluation, including the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Results: Our study reveals some differences between OGTT and CGM in detecting NAFLD children with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). OGTT showed 2 (6.67%) patients with IFG and 1 (3.34%) with IGT, while CGM showed 5 (16.67%) patients with IFG and 6 (20%) with IGT. The daily blood glucose profile positively correlated with the baseline blood glucose (r = 0.39, p = 0.04) and the homeostatic model assessment (r = 0.56, p = 0.05). A positive correlation between hyperglycemia and liver fibrosis was found (r = 0.65, p < 0.05). Mean glucose values (F3-F4 group: 163.2 ± 35.92 mg/dl vs. F1 group: 136.58 ± 46.83 mg/dl and F2 group: 154.12 ± 22.51 mg/dl) and the difference between the minimum and maximum blood glucose levels (F3-F4 group: 110.21 ± 25.26 mg/dl vs. F1 group: 91.67 ± 15.97 mg/dl and F2 group: 92 ± 15.48 mg/dl) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the F3-F4 group compared to the F1 and F2 groups. Conclusion: Glucose profile derangement as detected by CGM is associated with the severity of hepatic fibrosis in children with NAFLD.

1.
Day CP: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a massive problem. Clin Med 2011;11:176-178.
2.
Nobili V, Svegliati-Baroni G, Alisi A, et al: A 360-degree overview of paediatric NAFLD: recent insights. J Hepatol 2013;58:1218-1229.
3.
Marzuillo P, Miraglia del Giudice E, Santoro N: Pediatric fatty liver disease: role of ethnicity and genetics. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:7347-7355.
4.
Brunt EM: Pathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;7:195-203.
5.
Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G: Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med 2011;43:617-649.
6.
Feldstein AE, Charatcharoenwitthaya P, Treeprasertsuk S, et al: The natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children: a follow-up study for up to 20 years. Gut 2009;58:1538-1544.
7.
Fracanzani AL, Valenti L, Bugianesi E, et al: Risk of severe liver disease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with normal aminotransferase levels: a role for insulin resistance and diabetes. Hepatology 2008;48:792-798.
8.
Hossain N, Afendy A, Stepanova M, et al: Independent predictors of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:1224-1229.
9.
Angulo P: Obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nutr Rev 2007;65:S57-S63.
10.
Node K, Inoue T: Postprandial hyperglycemia as an etiological factor in vascular failure. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2009;8:23.
11.
Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C, et al: Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. JAMA 2006;295:1681-1687.
12.
Fujii H, Kawada N: Inflammation and fibrogenesis in steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol 2012;47:215-225.
13.
Lodwig V, Kulzer B, Schnell O, Heinemann L: Current trends in continuous glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2014;8:390-396.
14.
Williams JR: The Declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bull World Health Organ 2008;86:650-652.
15.
Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412-419.
16.
Walker RW, Allayee H, Inserra A, et al: Macrophages and fibrosis in adipose tissue are linked to liver damage and metabolic risk in obese children. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014;22:1512-1519.
17.
FDA: Statistical guidance on reporting results from studies evaluating diagnostic tests. http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm071148.htm (accessed March 13, 2007).
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.