Background/Aims: A more advanced bone age (BA) has been reported for the left hand relative to the right hand, while another study has found no such effect. The aim was to study the average difference of automated BoneXpert BA determination (left- vs. right-hand) for normal children, examine the precision of automatic BA and provide a BA reference for normal Caucasian children. Methods: Radiographs of both hands (age range: 2–20 years) were digitised and analysed automatically to determine Greulich-Pyle BA, producing analysis results for 3,374 left-hand and 2,752 right-hand images. Results: Comparison of left- and right-hand BA showed no average difference (<0.07 years, 95% confidence). The SD of the differences between left and right sides was 0.25 years for boys as well as girls, implying the precision of automated Greulich-Pyle BA determination was 0.18 years or better. Greulich-Pyle BA for boys and girls were on average 0.10 and 0.21 years below the chronological age. Conclusion: The left and right hand give the same BA on average and the SD between the sides is 0.25 years, indicating an excellent precision of the automated method.

1.
Prader A, Largo RH, Molinari L, Issler C: Physical growth of Swiss children from birth to 20 years of age. First Zurich longitudinal study of growth and development. Helv Paediatr Acta Suppl 1989;52:1–125.
2.
Gasser T, Sheehy A, Largo RH: Statistical characterization of the pubertal growth spurt. Ann Hum Biol 2001;28:395–402.
3.
Roche AF: A study of skeletal maturation in a group of Melbourne children. Austral Paediatr J 1967;3:123–127.
4.
Baer MJ, Djrkatz J: Bilateral asymmetry in skeletal maturation of the hand and wrist: a roentgenographic analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 1957;15:181–196.
5.
Roche AF, Chumlea W, Thissen D: Assessing the Skeletal Maturity of the Hand-wrist: FELS Method. Springfield, Thomas, 1988.
6.
Thodberg HH, Kreiborg S, Juul A, Damgaard-Petersen K: The BoneXpert method for automated determination of skeletal maturity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:52–66.
7.
van Rijn RR, Lequin MH, Thodberg HH: Automatic determination of Greulich and Pyle bone age in healthy Dutch children. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:591–597.
8.
Martin DD, Deusch D, Schweizer R, Binder, G, Thodberg HH, Ranke MB: Clinical application of automated Greulich-Pyle bone age determination in children with short stature. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:598–607.
9.
Thodberg, HH: An automated method for determination of bone age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:2239–2244.
10.
Oldfield, RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113.
11.
Roche AF, Rohmann C, French N, Davila G: Effect of training on replicability of assessments of skeletal maturity (Greulich-Pyle). Am J Roentgenol 1970;108:511–515.
12.
Bull R, Edwards P, Kemp P, Fry S, Hughes I: Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Arch Dis Child: 1999;31:172–173.
13.
Martin D, Thodberg HH, Sato K, Sato M, Tanaka T: Validation of a new method for automated determination of bone age in Japanese children. Hormone Research 2009, accepted for publication.
14.
Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N: Assessment of Skeletal Maturity and Predicting of Adult Height (TW3 method), ed 3. London, Saunders, 2001.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.