Background: Global accessibility and dissemination of developments in pediatric endocrinology prompted to examine how to develop an educational interactive e-SPE web portal. Methods: A systematic approach was used to identify the relevant aspects of accessibility and dissemination. An orientation at the big idea was made, executed by an analysis of the needs of student and teacher pediatric endocrinologists, a definition of the learning objectives, a research in educational literature and an exploration of ICT design specifications. Results: The intensive collaboration between medical, educational and information technology disciplines resulted in a portal design. The portal meets requirements of adult learning, stresses interaction between partners in learning and offers direct feedback during the learning process. The portal supports the development of not only knowledge but also competences both at junior and advanced levels. Conclusion: When the e-SPE portal is completed, the options for summative assessment will be examined as a medium for international certification in conjunction with local and national requirements (http://espe.elearning.nl).

Keywords:
Development medical competencies, e-Learning, Adult learning, Assessment in competency-based learning
1.
Irby DM: Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med 1995;70:898–931.
2.
Kolb AD: Learning and problem-solving: on management and the learning process; in Kolb AD, et al (eds): Organizational Psychology. New York, Prentice-Hall, 1974.
3.
Vermunt JD, Verloop N: Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learn Instruct 1999;9:257–280.
4.
Knowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RA: The Adult Learner. The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, ed 6. London, Elsevier, 2005.
5.
Willcoxson L: The impact of academic learning and teaching preferences on their teaching practice; a pilot study. Stud High Educ 1998;23:59–70.
6.
Ramani S: Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Med Teach 2006;28:19–23.
7.
European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE), 2006 (http://www.eurospe.org/).
8.
European Board of Paediatrics (EBP): European training syllabus in paediatric endocrinology and diabetes, Swedish version, 2006 (http://www.eurospe.org/education/education_training.html).
9.
Royal College of Physicians of Surgeons of Canada: CanMEDS project, 2000, 2005 (http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/index.php).
10.
Jonassen D: Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educ Technol Res Dev 1991;39:5–14.
11.
Regehr G, Norman GR: Issues in cognitive psychology: implications for professional education. Acad Med 1996;71:988–1001.
12.
Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA: On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educ Psychol Rev 1993;5:205–221.
13.
Anderson T: Toward a theory of online learning (2). (http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/athabasca_univ/theory_and_practice/ch2.html).
14.
Bergenhenegouwen GJM EAM, Tillema HH: Strategisch opleiden in organisaties. Deventer, Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen, 1992.
15.
Orrel J: Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality. Teach High Educ 2006;11:441–456.
16.
Gibbs G, Simpson C: Conditions under which assessment supports students’ learning. Learn Teach High Educ 2004;5:3–31.
17.
Van den Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT: Assessing professional competency: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005;39:309–317.
18.
Galbraith M, Hawkins RE, Holmboe ES: Making self-assessment more effective. J Cont Educ Health Prof 2008;28:20–24.
19.
Schuwirth LWT, van den Vleuten CPM: A plea for new psychometric models in educational assessment. Med Educ 2006;40:296–300.
20.
Violato C, Lockyer J: Self and peer assessment of pediatricians, psychiatrists and medicine specialists: implications for self-directed learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2006;11:235–244.
21.
Schuwirth LWT: Measuring and maintaining the quality of our students and doctors. Current developments in assessment. Invited address at the ESPE steering committee meeting, Brussels, 28 February 2006.
22.
Cate OT, Scheele F: Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82:542–547.
23.
Rudland J, Wilkinson T, Smith-Han K, Thompson-Fawcett M: You can do it late at night or in the morning. You can do it at home, I did it with my flatmate. The educational impact of an OSCE. Med Teach 2008;30:206–211.
24.
Jefferies A, Simmons B, Tabak D, McIlroy H, Lee KS, Roukema H, Skidmore M: Using an objective structured clinical examination to assess multiple physician competencies in postgraduate training. Med Teach 2007;29:181–191.
25.
Choules AP: The use of e-learning in medical education: a review of the current situation. Postgrad Med J 2007;83:212–216.
26.
Ericsson KAC N: Expert performance. Am Psychol 1994;49:725–747.
27.
Swanson DB, Norcini JJ, Grosso LJ: Assessment of clinical competence: written and computer-based simulations. Assess Eval High Educ 1987;12:220–246.
28.
Cascallar A, Cascallar E: Setting standards in the assessment of complex performances: the optimized extended response setting method; in Segers M, Dochy F, Cascallar E (eds): Optimizing New Methods of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 2003.
29.
Miller GE: The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 1990;65(suppl):S63–S67.
30.
Royce J: Plagiarism: keeping up with the cheats. A bibliography (http://park.robcol.k12.tr/jroyce/plagbibl2.html).
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.