Aim: To investigate the relationship of forearm length (FL) or height to bone parameters of the forearm of a normal pediatric population in comparison to individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). Methods: Data on FL, height and peripheral quantitative computed tomography measurements of the forearm were collected from participants of the DONALD study (140 males and 156 females; age 5–19 years) and from 73 patients with OI (53 males; mean age ± SD: 11.7 ± 3.3 years). Bone mineral content (BMC) was transformed into standard deviation score (SDS) according to height or FL. Results: Height and Tanner stages significantly predicted FL in males (R2adjusted = 0.960) and females (R2adjusted = 0.934). Height was a stronger predictor of FL than Tanner stages. Compared to controls, patients with OI were characterized by lower BMC-SDSFL and lower BMC-SDSheight (–0.37 ± 1.77 vs. 0.00 ± 0.97, p = 0.002, and –0.15 ± 5.0 vs. –0.02 ± 1.01, p = 0.011, respectively). BMC-SDSFL was not significantly lower than BMC-SDSheight in controls, and also not lower in patients with OI (p = 0.865 and p = 0.809). The height/FL ratio was significantly decreased in patients with OI (mean ± SD: 6.34 ± 0.38 vs. 6.45 ± 0.21, p = 0.001) compared with controls. Conclusion: Because of disproportional growth, BMC may be overestimated in OI patients.

Keywords:
Body height, Bone mineral content, Disproportional growth, Forearm length, Osteogenesis imperfecta
1.
Fricke O, Schoenau E: The ‘Functional Muscle-Bone Unit’: probing the relevance of mechanical signals for bone development in children and adolescents. Growth Horm IGF Res 2007;17:1–9.
2.
Frost HM: The Utah paradigm of skeletal physiology: an overview of its insights for bone, cartilage and collagenous tissue organs. J Bone Miner Metab 2000;18:305–316.
3.
Frost HM: Muscle, bone, and the Utah paradigm: a 1999 overview. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000;32:911–917.
4.
Frost HM, Ferretti JL, Jee WS: Perspectives: some roles of mechanical usage, muscle strength, and the mechanostat in skeletal physiology, disease and research. Calcif Tissue Int 1998;62:1–7.
5.
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F: The development of bone strength at the proximal radius during childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:613–618.
6.
Neu CM, Manz F, Rauch F, et al: Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 2001;28:227–232.
7.
Schoenau E, Land C, Stabrey A, et al: The bone mass concept: problems in short stature. Eur J Endocrinol 2004;151(suppl 1):87–91.
8.
Mazess RB, Cameron JR: Skeletal growth in school children: maturation and bone mass. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;35:399–407.
9.
Mazess RB, Cameron JR: Growth of bone in school children: comparison of radiographic morphometry and photon absorptiometry. Growth 1972;36:77–92.
10.
Kroger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J, Kotaniemi A: Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology. Bone 1995;17:157–159.
11.
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Mokov E, et al: Influence of puberty on muscle area and cortical bone area of the forearm in boys and girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;85:1095–1098.
12.
Rauch F, Schoenau E: The developing bone: slave or master of its cells and molecules? Pediatr Res 2001;50:309–314.
13.
Karlsson MK, Linden C, Karlsson C, et al: Exercise during growth and bone mineral density and fractures in old age. Lancet 2000;355:469–470.
14.
Karlsson MK, Magnusson H, Karlsson C, Seeman E: The duration of exercise as a regulator of bone mass. Bone 2001;28:128–132.
15.
Schoenau E, Frost HM: The ‘muscle-bone unit’ in children and adolescents. Calcif Tissue Int 2002;70:405–407.
16.
Gauld LM, Kappers J, Carlin JB, Robertson CF: Height prediction from ulna length. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46:475–480.
17.
Tanner J: Growth at Adolescence, ed 2. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific, 1962.
18.
Bechtold S, Ripperger P, Bonfig W, Pozza RD, Haefner R, Schwarz HP: Growth hormone changes bone geometry and body composition in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis requiring glucocorticoid treatment: a controlled study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:3168–3173.
19.
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F: Gender-specific pubertal changes in volumetric cortical bone mineral density at the proximal radius. Bone 2002;31:110–113.
20.
Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F, Schoenau E: Modeling of cross-sectional bone size, mass and geometry at the proximal radius: a study of normal bone development using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:538–547.
21.
Rauch F, Klein K, Allolio B, Schoenau E: Age at menarche and cortical bone geometry in premenopausal women. Bone 1999;25:69–73.
22.
Alexy U, Remer T, Manz F, Neu CM, Schoenau E: Long-term protein intake and dietary potential renal acid load are associated with bone modeling and remodeling at the proximal radius in healthy children. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:1107–1114.
23.
Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK: Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:262–270.
24.
Mitchell CO, Lipschitz DA: Arm length measurement as an alternative to height in nutritional assessment of the elderly. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1982;6:226–229.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.