Background: Bone densitometric data are often difficult to interpret in children and adolescents because of large inter- and intraindividual variations in bone size. We propose a functional approach to bone densitometry that addresses two questions: is bone strength normally adapted to the largest physiological loads represented by muscle force, and is muscle force adequate for body size? Methods and Results: The theoretical background for this approach is provided by the mechanostat theory, which proposes that bones adapt their strength to keep the strain caused by physiological loads close to a set point. Because the largest physiological loads are caused by muscle contractions, there should be a close relationship between bone strength and muscle force or size. The proposed two-step diagnostic algorithm requires a measure of muscle force or size and a measure of bone mineral content at a corresponding location. Conclusion: This approach justifies the hope that more detailed insights into this matter could help devise targeted strategies for the prevention and treatment of pediatric bone diseases.

1.
Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N: The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994;9:1137–1141.
2.
Garn SM, Wagner B: The adolescent growth of the skeletal mass and its implications to mineral requirements; in Heald FP (ed): Adolescent Nutrition and Growth. New York, Appleton-Century Crofts, 1969, pp 139–161.
3.
Mazess RB, Cameron JR: Skeletal growth in school children: maturation and bone mass. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;35:399–407.
4.
Mazess RB, Cameron JR: Growth of bone in school children: comparison of radiographic morphometry and photon absorptiometry. Growth 1972;36:77–92.
5.
Gilsanz V, Gibbens DT, Carlson M, Boechat MI, Cann CE, Schulz EE: Peak trabecular vertebral density: a comparison of adolescent and adult females. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;43:260–262.
6.
Gilsanz V, Gibbens DT, Roe TF, Carlson M, Senac MO, Boechat MI, Huang HK, Schulz EE, Libanati CR, Cann CC: Vertebral bone density in children: effect of puberty. Radiology 1988;166:847–850.
7.
Glastre C, Braillon P, David L, Cochat P, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD: Measurement of bone mineral content of the lumbar spine by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in normal children: correlations with growth parameters. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1330–1333.
8.
Bonjour JP, Theintz G, Buchs B, Slosman D, Rizzoli R: Critical years and stages of puberty for spinal and femoral bone mass accumulation during adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991;73:555–563.
9.
Mazess RB: On aging bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;May:239–252.
10.
Riggs BL, Melton LJ: Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1676–1686.
11.
Riggs BL, Melton LJ: Evidence for two distinct syndromes of involutional osteoporosis. Am J Med 1983;75:899–901.
12.
Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Riis BJ, Christiansen C: Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study. BMJ 1991;303:961–964.
13.
Seeman E, Tsalamandris C, Formica C: Peak bone mass, a growing problem? Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 1993;38(suppl 2):77–82.
14.
Seeman E, Hopper JL, Bach LA, Cooper ME, Parkinson E, McKay J, Jerums G: Reduced bone mass in daughters of women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1989;320:554–558.
15.
Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, Reid I, Ehrlich G, Kanis J, Nordin BE, Barrett-Connor E, Black D, Bonjour JP, Dawson-Hughes B, Delmas PD, Dequeker J, Eis SR, Gennari C, Johnell O, Johnston CC, Lau EM, Liberman UA, Lindsay R, Martin TJ, Masri B, Mautalen CA, Meunier PJ, Miller PD, Mithal A, Morii H, Papapoulos S, Woolf A, Yu W, Khaltaev N: Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization task-force for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999;10:259–264.
16.
Pinilla TP, Boardman KC, Bouxsein ML, Myers ER, Hayes WC: Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:231–235.
17.
Sandor T, Felsenberg D, Brown E: Comments on the hypotheses underlying fracture risk assessment in osteoporosis as proposed by the World Health Organization. Calcif Tissue Int 1999;64:267–270.
18.
Molgaard C, Thomsen BL, Michaelsen KF: Influence of weight, age and puberty on bone size and bone mineral content in healthy children and adolescents. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:494–499.
19.
Kroger H, Vainio P, Nieminen J, Kotaniemi A: Comparison of different models for interpreting bone mineral density measurements using DXA and MRI technology. Bone 1995;17:157–159.
20.
Lu PW, Cowell CT, Lloyd-Jones SA, Briody JN, Howman-Giles R: Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5–27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;81:1586–1590.
21.
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Beck B, Manz F, Rauch F: Bone mineral content per muscle cross-sectional area as an index of the functional muscle-bone unit. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:1095–1101.
22.
Rauch F, Schoenau E: The developing bone: slave or master of its cells and molecules? Pediatr Res 2001;50:309–314.
23.
Finkelstein JS, Neer RM, Biller BM, Crawford JD, Klibanski A: Osteopenia in men with a history of delayed puberty. N Engl J Med 1992;326:600–604.
24.
Bertelloni S, Baroncelli GI, Ferdeghini M, Perri G, Saggese G: Normal volumetric bone mineral density and bone turnover in young men with histories of constitutional delay of puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:4280–4283.
25.
Klaus G, Paschen C, Wuster C, Kovacs GT, Barden J, Mehls O, Scharer K: Weight-/height-related bone mineral density is not reduced after renal transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol 1998;12:343–348.
26.
Sanchez CP, Salusky IB, Kuizon BD, Ramirez JA, Gales B, Ettenger RB, Goodman WG: Bone disease in children and adolescents undergoing successful renal transplantation. Kidney Int 1998;53:1358–1364.
27.
Reusz GS, Szabo AJ, Peter F, Kenesei E, Sallay P, Latta K, Szabo A, Tulassay T: Bone metabolism and mineral density following renal transplantation. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:146–151.
28.
Galilei G: Dialogues concerning two new sciences (de Slavio A, Crew H, transl. 1939). Italian original 1638.
29.
Carter DR, Wong M, Orr TE: Musculoskeletal ontogeny, phylogeny, and functional adaptation. J Biomech 1991;24(suppl 1):3–16.
30.
Ward L, Glorieux F: The spectrum of pediatric osteoporosis; in Glorieux F, Pettifor J, Juepper H (eds): Pediatric Bone: Biology and Disease. San Diego, Academic Press, 2003.
31.
Neu CM, Rauch F, Manz F, Schoenau E: Modeling of cross-sectional bone size, mass and geometry at the proximal radius: a study of normal bone development using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:538–547.
32.
Schiessl H, Frost HM, Jee WS: Estrogen and bone-muscle strength and mass relationships. Bone 1998;22:1–6.
33.
Johnston CC, Miller JZ, Slemenda CW, Reister TK, Hui S, Christian JC, Peacock M: Calcium supplementation and increases in bone mineral density in children. N Engl J Med 1992;327:82–87.
34.
Lee WT, Leung SS, Leung DM, Cheng JC: A follow-up study on the effects of calcium-supplement withdrawal and puberty on bone acquisition of children. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;64:71–77.
35.
Slemenda CW, Peacock M, Hui S, Zhou L, Johnston CC: Reduced rates of skeletal remodeling are associated with increased bone mineral density during the development of peak skeletal mass. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12:676–682.
36.
Karlsson MK, Linden C, Karlsson C, Johnell O, Obrant K, Seeman E: Exercise during growth and bone mineral density and fractures in old age. Lancet 2000;355:469–470.
37.
Pajamaki I, Kannus P, Vuohelainen T, Sievanen H, Tuukkanen J, Jarvinen M, Jarvinen TL: The bone gain induced by exercise in puberty is not preserved through a virtually life-long deconditioning: a randomized controlled experimental study in male rats. J Bone Miner Res 2003;18:544–552.
38.
Gafni RI, McCarthy EF, Hatcher T, Meyers JL, Inoue N, Reddy C, Weise M, Barnes KM, Abad V, Baron J: Recovery from osteoporosis through skeletal growth: early bone mass acquisition has little effect on adult bone density. FASEB J 2002;16:736–768.
39.
Schoenau E, Neu CM, Beck B, Manz F, Rauch F: Bone mineral content per muscle cross-sectional area as an index of the functional muscle-bone unit. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17:1095–1101.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.