Objectives: HLA genes are highly polymorphic in human populations as a result of diversifying selection related to their immune function. However, HLA geographic variation worldwide suggests that demographic factors also shaped their evolution. We here analyzed in detail HLA genetic variation in Europe in order to identify signatures of migration history and/or natural selection. Methods: Relationships between HLA diversity and geography were analyzed at 7 loci through several approaches including linear regression on gene diversity and haplotype frequencies. Regional variation was also assessed on HLA multi-locus phenotypes through structure analysis. Deviation from neutrality was tested by resampling. Results: Geographic distance was a strong predictor of HLA variation at 5 loci (A, B, C, DRB1 and DPB1) in Europe, and latitude significantly shaped HLA gene diversity and haplotype frequencies. Whereas the main level of genetic diversity was found within populations, both HLA gene frequencies and phenotypic profiles revealed regional variation, Southeast Europe, Great Britain and Finland being the most distinctive. Effects of natural selection were suggested at the DQ loci. Conclusions: HLA regional variation was observed in Europe and can be related to population history, locus HLA-A providing by far the strongest signals. This new HLA map of Europe represents an invaluable reference for disease-association studies and tissue transplantation.

Keywords:
HLA, Population genetics, European, Caucasian, Demographic history, Genetic diversity, Human populations, Linkage disequilibrium, Multi-allelic loci, Natural selection
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.