Previous accounts of the development of triadic attention identify a ‘‘curious'' shift around nine to twelve months. We introduce a novel approach inspired by distributed and embodied cognition frameworks. In a longitudinal study of five mother-infant dyads, videos of home play interactions were recorded over the infants' first year. We scrutinized the real-time organization of mother-infant sensorimotor activity, including the targets of hands, gaze, and mouth, as the dyad members attended to one another and to toys. We identified a pervasive developmental pattern: At four months, infants converged all sensory modalities on objects introduced by the mother. From six to twelve months, infants showed increasing decoupling of hands and eyes and increasingly elaborate sequences in multi-object play. Concurrently, dyads engaged in increasingly elaborate social exchanges (e.g., turn-taking) as mothers adapted to infants' sensorimotor skills. We therefore theorize that triadic attention emerges not as a novel form of social cognition but as a continuous product of sensorimotor development, scaffolded by parents' expanding social actions.

1.
Adamson, L.B., & Bakeman, R. (1984). Mothers' communicative acts: Changes during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 467-478.
2.
Adamson, L., & Bakeman, R. (1991). The development of shared attention during infancy. Annals of Child Development, 8, 1-41.
3.
Adamson, L.B., Bakeman, R., & Deckner, D.F. (2004). The development of symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development, 75, 1171-1187.
4.
Bakeman, R., & Adamson, L. (1984). Coordinating attention to people and objects in mother-infant and peer-infant interaction. Child Development, 55, 1278-1289.
5.
Bates, E. (1979). The emergence of symbols: Ontogeny and phylogeny. In A. Collins (Ed.), Children's language and communication: The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology.Vol. 12 (pp. 121-157). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
6.
Bates, E., Benigni, L., Bretherton, I., Camaioni, L., & Volterra, V. (1979). The emergence of symbols:Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Belsky, J., & Most, R.K. (1981). From exploration to play: A cross-sectional study of infant free play behavior. Developmental Psychology, 17, 630.
8.
Bornstein, M., & Tamis LeMonda, C. (1989). Maternal responsiveness and cognitive development in children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1989, 49-61.
9.
Bourgeois, K.S., Khawar, A.W., Neal, S.A., & Lockman, J.J. (2005). Infant manual exploration of objects, surfaces, and their interrelations. Infancy, 8, 233-252.
10.
Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing: New York: Norton.
11.
Bruner, J. (1975). From communication to language - A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3, 255-287.
12.
Bruner, J.S. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.
13.
Bushnell, E.W. (1985). The decline of visually guided reaching during infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 139-155.
14.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, i-vi, 1-143.
15.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Cohn, J.F., & Tronick, E.Z. (1987). Mother-infant face-to-face interaction: the sequence of dyadic states at 3, 6, and 9 months. Developmental Psychology, 23, 68.
17.
Deák, G.O., Krasno, A., Triesch, J., Lewis, J., & Sepeta, L. (under review). Watch the hands: Infants learn to follow gaze by seeing adults manipulate objects.
18.
de Barbaro, K., Johnson, C.M., Forster, D., & Deák, G.O. (in press). Methodological considerations for investigating the micro-dynamics of social interaction development. Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development.
19.
de Barbaro, K., Johnson, C.M., Forster, D., & Deák, G.O. (under revision). Infant sensory-motor decoupling contributes to 12 month social “revolution”: A longitudinal investigation of mother-infant-object interactions.
20.
Dodici, B.J., Draper, D.C., & Peterson, C.A. (2003). Early parent-child interactions and early literacy development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 124.
21.
Eckerman, C.O., Whately, J., & McGehee, L. (1979). Approaching and contacting the object another manipulates: A social skill of the 1-year-old. Developmental Psychology, 15, 585.
22.
Fenson, L., Kagan, J., Kearsley, R.B., & Zelazo, P.R. (1976). The developmental progression of manipulative play in the first two years. Child Development, 47, 232-236.
23.
Field, T.M. (1981). Infant gaze aversion and heart rate during face-to-face interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 4, 307-315.
24.
Fiser, J., Aslin, R., Lathrop, A., Rothkopf, C., & Markant, J. (2006). An infants' eye view of the world: Implications for learning in natural contexts. Presentation at the biennial meeting of the International Society on Infant Studies, Kyoto, Japan.
25.
Fogel, A., & DeKoeyer-Laros, I. (2007). The developmental transition to secondary intersubjectivity in the second half year: A microgenetic case study. Journal of Developmental Processes, 2, 63-90.
26.
Fogel, A., Messinger, D.S., Dickson, K.L., & Hsu, H. (1999). Posture and gaze in early mother-infant communication: Synchronization of developmental trajectories. Developmental Science, 2, 325-332.
27.
Forster, D. (2002). Consort turnovers as distributed cognition in olive baboons: A systems approach to mind. In M. Bekoff, C. Allen, & G.M. Burghardt (Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition (pp. 163-171). Cambridge: MIT Press.
28.
Forster, D., & Rodriguez, P.F. (2006). Social complexity and distributed cognition in olive baboons (Papio anubis): Adding system dynamics to analysis of interaction data. Aquatic Mammals, 32, 528-543.
29.
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287-292.
30.
Gibson, E.J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 1-42.
31.
Goldfield, B. (1993). Noun bias in maternal speech to one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 20, 85-99.
32.
Grice, H.P., Cole, P., & Morgan, J.L. (1975). Syntax and semantics. Logic and Conversation, 3, 41-58.
33.
Hay, D.F. (1979). Cooperative interactions and sharing between very young children and their parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 647.
34.
Hsu, H.C., & Fogel, A. (2003). Stability and transitions in mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first 6 months: A microhistorical approach. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1061.
35.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
36.
Jhuang, H., Serre, T., Wolf, L., & Poggio, T. (2007). A biologically inspired system for action recognition. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 1-8). Rio de Janeiro: IEEE Press.
37.
Johnson, C.M. (2001). Distributed primate cognition: A review. Animal Cognition, 3, 167-183.
38.
Johnson, C.M. (2010). Observing cognitive complexity in primates and cetaceans. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23, 587-624.
39.
Johnson, C.M., & Karin-D'Arcy, M.R. (2006). Social attention in nonhuman primates: A behavioral review. Aquatic Mammals, 32, 423.
40.
Kaye, K., & Fogel, A. (1980). The temporal structure of face-to-face communication between mothers and infants. Developmental Psychology, 16, 454.
41.
Kotwica, K.A., Ferre, C.L., & Michel, G.F. (2008). Relation of stable hand use preferences to the development of skill for managing multiple objects from 7 to 13 months of age. Developmental Psychobiology, 50, 519-529.
42.
Krasno, A., Deák, G.O., Jasso, H., Lewis, J., & Triesch, J. (2007). Watch the hands: Do infants learn gaze-following from parent's object manipulation? Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development.
43.
Lansink, J.M., & Richards, J.E. (1997). Heart rate and behavioral measures of attention in six-, nine-, and twelve-month-old infants during object exploration. Child Development, 68, 610-620.
44.
Lawson, K.R., & Ruff, H.A. (2004). Early focused attention predicts outcome for children born prematurely. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 25, 399.
45.
Lockman, J.J. (2000). A perception-action perspective on tool use development. Child Development, 71, 137-144.
46.
Meltzoff, A.N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18- month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838.
47.
Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
Oakes, L.M., & Tellinghuisen, D.J. (1994). Examining in infancy: Does it reflect active processing? Developmental Psychology, 30, 748.
49.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
50.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation.Vol. 24. New York: Norton.
51.
Ratner, N., & Bruner, J. (1978). Games, social exchange and the acquisition of language. Journal of Child Language, 5, 391-401.
52.
Rochat, P. (1989). Object manipulation and exploration in 2- to 5-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 25, 871.
53.
Ross, H.S., & Lollis, S.P. (1987). Communication within infant social games. Developmental Psychology, 23, 241.
54.
Ruff, H., & Saltarelli, L. (1993). Exploratory play with objects: Basic cognitive processes and individual differences. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1993, 5-16.
55.
Sainburg, R.L., Poizner, H., & Ghez, C. (1993). Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2136-2147.
56.
Stern, D.N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
57.
Streri, A., & Feron, J. (2005). The development of haptic abilities in very young infants: From perception to cognition. Infant Behavior and Development, 28, 290-304.
58.
Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-690.
60.
Trevarthen, C., & Hubley, P. (1978). Secondary intersubjectivity: Confidence, confiding and acts of meaning in the first year. In A. Lock (Ed.), Action, gesture and symbol: The emergence of language (pp. 183-229). London: Academic Press.
61.
Tronick, E., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S., & Brazelton, T.B. (1978). The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Pediatrics, 62, 403.
62.
Tronick, E.Z., Ricks, M., & Cohn, J.F. (1982). Maternal and infant affective exchange: Patterns of adaptation. In T. Field & A. Fogel (Eds.), Emotion and early interaction (pp. 83-100). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
63.
Wohlschläger, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 501-515.
64.
Woodward, A.L. (2005). The infant origins of intentional understanding. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 33, 229-262.
65.
Yoshida, H., & Smith, L.B. (2008). What's in view for toddlers? Using a head camera to study visual experience. Infancy, 13, 229-248.
66.
Zukow-Goldring, P., & Arbib, M.A. (2007). Affordances, effectivities, and assisted imitation: Caregivers and the directing of attention. Neurocomputing, 70, 2181-2193.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.