Abstract
The article describes a theory-driven approach to meaningful learning in primary schools, based on the Vygotskian cultural-historical theory of human development and learning. This approach is elaborated into an educational concept called ‘developmental education’ that is implemented in the Netherlands in many primary schools. In this approach, meaningful learning is conceived of as a way of learning through participation in cultural practices emulated in primary schools, which integrates both cultural (conventional) meanings and personal sense of the pupils. The major mission of this developmental education approach is to engage pupils in the creative production of culture in ways that give them access to the culture’s collective memory, mastery of communicative means, and prevent alienation. The article argues that such a type of non-alienating, meaningful cultural learning can be realized optimally when pupils learn to play relevant roles in cultural practices (called ‘imitative participation’) and are assisted to critically appropriate the tools and rules that are required for the accomplishment of these roles. As a case for the illustration of the potentials of the approach, the development of abstract thinking in primary school is analyzed and clarified. Abstract thinking is here taken (following Cassirer) as a way of consistently conceiving from a specific point of view and related to the role a person enacts.
References
1.
Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. An introduction to school learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
2.
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. (H. Iswolsky, transl.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
Bibler, V.C. (1989). Dialog, soznanie, kul’tura. Ideja kul’tury v rabotach M.M. Bachtina. In V.S. Bibler, Odissej. Celovek v historii-Issledovanija po social’noj istorii i istorii kul’tury. Moscow: Nauka.
4.
Bolton, N. (1972). They psychology of thinking. London: Meuthuen.
5.
Cassirer, E. (1923). Substance and function and Einstein’s theory of relativity. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
6.
Christopher, J.C., & Bickhard, M.H. (2007). Culture, self and identity: Interactivist contributions to a metatheory for cultural psychology. Psychology and Culture, 13, 259–295.
7.
Cohen, A.B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.
8.
Davydov, V.V. (1972). Vidy obobščenie v obučenii. Moscow: Pedagogika.
9.
Derry, J. (2003). Vygotsky and his critics. Philosophy and rationality. Unpubl. doctoral dissertation, University of London, London.
10.
Doblaev, L.P. (1982). Smyslovaja struktura učebnogo teksta i problemy ego ponimanija. Moscow: Izd-vo Pedagogika.
11.
Durand-Guerrier, V., Héraud, J.L., & Tisseron, C. (2006). Jeu et enjeux de langage dans l’élaboration des savoirs en classe. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
12.
Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind. How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Elkonin, D.B. (1972). Toward the problem of stages in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology, 10, 225–251.
14.
Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and Instruction, 1, 243–259.
15.
Fiske, A.P. (2002). Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures – A critique of the validity and measurements of the constructs: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128, 78–88.
16.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1930). Wer denkt abstrakt? In H. Glockner (Ed.), Sämtliche Werke. Vol. 20 (pp. 445–450). Stuttgart: Frommann.
17.
Hirschkop, K. (1989). Introduction. Bakhtin and cultural theory. In K. Hirschkop & D. Shepard (Eds.), Bakhtin and cultural theory (pp. 1–38). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18.
Ilyenkov, E.V. (1982). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’ Capital. Moscow: Progress. (Originally published in 1960.)
19.
Kučinskij, G.M. (1983). Dialog i myšlenie. Minsk: Izd-vo BGU im. V.I. Lenina.
20.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1975). Dejatel’nost’, soznanie, ličnost’. Moscow: Izd-vo Političeskoj Literatury.
21.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1981). Problemy razvitija psichiki. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
22.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1983a). Obraz mira. In A.N. Leont’ev (Ed.), Izbrannye psichologičeskie proizvedenija. Vol. 2 (pp. 251–261). Moscow: Pedagogika.
23.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1983b). Načalo ličnosti – postupok. In A.N. Leont’ev (Ed.), Izbrannye psichologičeskie proizvedenija. Vol. 1 (pp. 381–385). Moscow: Pedagogika.
24.
Leont’ev, A.N. (1983c). Psichologičeskie osnovy doškol’noj igry. In A.N. Leont’ev (Ed.), Izbrannye psichologičeskie proizvedenija. Vol. 1 (pp. 303–323). Moscow: Pedagogika.
25.
Leont’ev, D.A. (2003). Psichologija smysla. Moscow: Izd-vo ‘Smysl’.
26.
Lotman, Y.M. (1990). Universe of the mind. A semiotic theory of culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
Luria, A.R. (1976). Cognitive development. Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28.
Luria, A.R. (1981). Language and cognition. New York: Wiley.
29.
Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view on emotions. In G. Wells & G. Claston (Eds.), Learning for the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 46–58). Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking. A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
31.
Obuchova, L.F., & Šapovalenko, I.V. (1994). Formy i funkcii podraženija v detskom vozraste. Moscow: Moskovskij Gosudarstvennyj Universitet.
32.
Piaget, J. (1977). Recherches sur l’abstraction réfléchissante, 1 et 2. Études d’épistémologie et de psychologie. Vol. 34, 35. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
33.
Poland, M. (2007). The treasures of schematising. The effects of schematising in early childhood on the learning processes and outcomes in later mathematical understanding. Doctoral dissertation. Enschede: Ipskamp.
34.
Poland, M., van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2009). Schematising activities in early childhood education. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 305–321.
35.
Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). The elaboration theory: Guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Vol. 2. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
36.
Roegholt, S., Wardekker, W., & van Oers, B. (1998). Teachers and pluralistic education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30, 125–141.
37.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Rojas-Drummond, S., Gómez, L., & Vélez, M. (2008). Dialogue for reasoning: promoting exploratory talk and problem solving in the primary classroom. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The transformation of learning. Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 319–341). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Backwell.
40.
Serpell, R. (1994). The cultural construction of intelligence. In W.J. Lonner & R.S. Malpass (Eds.), Psychology and culture (pp. 157–163). Boston: Allan & Bacon.
41.
Stanislavsky, C.S. (1988). An actor prepares. London: Methuen.
42.
Terwel, J., van Oers, B., van Dijk, I., & van den Eeden, P. (2009). Are representations to be provided or generated in primary mathematics education? Effects on transfer. Education Research and Evaluation, 15, 25–44.
43.
van Dijk, I.M., van Oers, B., & Terwel, J. (2003). Providing or designing? Constructing models as a strategy for working with contextual problems in primary maths education. Learning and Instruction,13, 53–72.
44.
van Oers, B. (1996). Are you sure? The promotion of mathematical thinking in play activities of young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 4, 71–89.
45.
van Oers, B. (1998). The fallacy of decontextualisation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 135–142.
46.
van Oers, B. (2001). Contextualisation for abstraction. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, 279–306.
47.
van Oers, B. (2003). Narratives of childhood. Amsterdam: VU Press.
48.
van Oers, B. (2005a). Carnaval in de kennisfabriek. De positie van het spel in Ontwikkelingsgericht Onderwijs. Inaugural lecture. Amsterdam: VU Press.
49.
van Oers, B. (2005b). The potentials of imagination. Inquiry, 24, 5–18.
50.
van Oers, B. (2006). An activity theory approach to the formation of mathematical cognition: Developing topics through predication in a mathematical community. In J. Maass & W. Schlöglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 113–139). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
51.
van Oers, B. (2007): Helping young children to become literate: the relevance of narrative competence for developmental education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15, 299–312.
52.
van Oers, B. (2009a). Ontwikkelingsgericht werken in de bovenbouw van de basisschool. Alkmaar: De Activiteit.
53.
van Oers, B. (2009b). Developmental education: Improving participation in cultural practices. In M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard & J. Tudge (Eds.), Childhood studies and the impact of globalization: Policies and practices at global and local levels – World yearbook of education 2009 (pp. 293–317). New York: Routledge.
54.
van Oers, B. (2010a). Children’s enculturation through play. In L. Brooker & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play (pp. 195–209). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
55.
van Oers, B. (2010b). The emergence of mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 23–37.
56.
van Oers, B. (2012a). Culture in play. In J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 936–956). New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
van Oers, B. (2012b). Developmental education for young children. Theory, practice and implementation. Berlin: Springer.
58.
van Oers, B., & Duijkers, D. (2012). Teaching in a play-based curriculum: Theory, practice and evidence of developmental education for young children. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44, 1–24.
59.
van Oers, B., & Poland, M. (2007). Schematising activities as a means for young children to think abstractly. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19, 10–22.
60.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1966). Igra i eë rol’v psichičeskom razvitii rebënka. Voprosy Psichologii, 6, 62–76. Translated in L.S. Vygotsky (1978), Mind in society (pp. 92–104). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
61.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1984). Problema vozrasta. In L.S. Vygotskij, Sobranie sočinenij. Vol. 4. (pp. 244–268). Moscow: Pedagogika.
62.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R.W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The Collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum.
63.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1991). Pedagogičeskaja psichologija. Moscow: Pedagogika. (Originally published in 1926; English translation see Vygotsky, 1997.)
64.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–345). Oxford: Blackwell.
65.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1997). Educational psychology. Boca Raton: St Lucie Press.
66.
Wegerif, R. (2008). Reason and dialogue in education. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, E. Elbers, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The transformation of learning. Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 273–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67.
Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C.D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research (pp. 51–85). New York: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Wertsch, J. (1996). The role of abstract rationality in Vygotsky’s image of mind. In A. Tryphon & J. Vonèche (Eds.), Piaget – Vygotsky. The social genesis of thought (pp. 25–44). Hove: Psychology Press.
69.
Wills, C. (1989). Upsetting the public: carnival, hysteria and women’s texts. In K. Hirschkop & D. Shepard (Eds.), Bakhtin and cultural theory (pp. 130–151). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
