1.
Aslin, R., & Fiser, J. (2005). Methodological challenges for understanding cognitive development in infants. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 92–98.
2.
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R.M., & He, Z. (2010). False belief understanding in infants. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 110–118.
3.
Bennett, M.R., & Hacker, P.M.S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden: Blackwell.
4.
Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bremner, A.J., & Mareschal, D. (2004). Reasoning ... what reasoning? Developmental Science, 7, 419–421.
6.
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2007). ‘Obsessed with goals’: Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychologica, 124, 60–78.
7.
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naïve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287–292.
8.
Hacker, P.M.S. (2007). Human nature: The categorial framework. Malden: Blackwell.
9.
Haith, M.M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition? Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior & Development, 21, 167–179.
10.
Kagan, J. (2008). In defense of qualitative changes in development. Child Development, 79, 1606–1624.
11.
McDowell, R. (2002). How not to read Philosophical Investigations: Brandom’s Wittgenstein. In R. Haller & K. Puhl (Eds.), Wittgenstein and the future of philosophy: a reassessment after 50 years (pp. 245–256). Vienna: Holder-Pichler-Tempsky.
12.
Munakata, Y., Bauer, D., Stackhouse, T., Landgraf, L., & Huddleson, J. (2002). Rich interpretation vs. deflationary accounts in cognitive development: The case of means-end skills in 7-month-old infants. Cognition, 83, B43–B53.
13.
Racine, T.P. (2012). Getting beyond rich and lean views of joint attention. In A. Seemann (Ed.), Joint attention: New developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience (pp. 21–42). Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
Racine, T.P., & Slaney, K.L. (in press). Terror management, meaning maintenance, and the concept of psychological meaning. In T.P. Racine & K.L. Slaney (Eds.), The role and use of conceptual analysis in psychology: A Wittgensteinian Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
Rakison, D.H. (2007). Inductive categorization: A methodology to examine the contents of concepts in infancy. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 4, 773–790.
16.
Rakoczy, H. (2012). Do infants have a theory of mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 59–74.
17.
Tissaw, M.A. (2007). Making sense of neonatal imitation. Theory & Psychology, 17, 217–242.
18.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78, 705–722.
19.
Weiss, B., & Wanderer, J. (Eds.) (2010). Reading Brandom: On making it explicit. New York: Routledge.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the...
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.