It has been suggested that preverbal infants evaluate the efficiency of others’ actions (by applying a principle of rational action) and that they imitate others’ actions rationally. The present contribution presents a conceptual analysis of the claim that preverbal infants imitate rationally. It shows that this ability rests on at least three assumptions: that infants are able to perceive others’ action capabilities, that infants reason about and conceptually represent their own bodies, and that infants are able to think counterfactually. It is argued that none of these three abilities is in place during infancy. Furthermore, it is shown that the idea of a principle of rational action suffers from two fallacies. As a consequence, is it suggested that it is not rational to assume that infants imitate rationally.

Keywords:
Action control, Action understanding, Conceptual analysis, Imitation
1.
Adolph, K.E., & Avolio, A. (2000). Walking infants adapt locomotion to changing body dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1148–1166.
2.
Adolph, K.E., & Berger, S. (2006). Motor development. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.), D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 161–213). New York: Wiley.
3.
Adolph, K.E., & Robinson, S.R. (2008). In defense of change processes. Child Development, 79, 1648–1653.
4.
Apperly, I.A., & Butterfill, S.A. (2009). Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological Review, 116, 953–970.
5.
Baillargeon, R. (2008). Innate ideas revisited: For a principle of persistence in infants’ physical reasoning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 2–13.
6.
Baker, C.L., Saxe, R.R., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2009). Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, 113, 329–349.
7.
Baldwin, J.M. (1968). Mental development in the child and race (3rd ed.). New York: Augustus M. Kelley. (Original work published in 1906.)
8.
Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–122.
9.
Beck, S.R., Riggs, K.J., & Gorniak, S.L. (2009). Relating developments in children’s counterfactual thinking and executive functions. Thinking and Reasoning, 15, 337–354.
10.
Beck, S.R., Robinson, E.J., Carroll, D.J., & Apperly, I.A. (2006). Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Child Development, 77, 413–426.
11.
Bennett, M.R., & Hacker, P.M.S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden: Blackwell.
12.
Bering, J.M., & Povinelli, D.J. (2003). Comparing cognitive development. In D. Maestripieri (Ed.), Primate psychology (pp. 205–233). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13.
Brandom, R.B. (1994). Making it explicit. Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Harvard: University Press.
14.
Brandom, R.B. (2009). Reason in philosophy: Animating ideas. Cambridge: Harvard Press.
15.
Brownell, C.A., & Koop, C. (Eds.) (2007). Socioemotional development in the toddler years: Transitions and transformations. New York: Guilford Press.
16.
Brownell, C.A., Nichols, S.R., Svetlova, M., Zerwas, S., & Ramani, G. (2010). The head bone’s connected to the neck bone: When do toddlers represent their own body topography? Child Development, 81, 797–810.
17.
Brownell, C.A., Zerwas, S., & Ramani, G.B. (2007). ‘So big’: The development of body self-awareness in toddlers. Child Development, 78, 1426–1440.
18.
Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Enculturated chimpanzees imitate rationally. Developmental Science, 10, F31–F38.
19.
Buttelmann, D., Carpenter, M., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Rational tool use and tool choice in human infants and great apes. Child Development, 79, 609–626.
20.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D.E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R.E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1243–1249.
21.
Campbell, R.L., & Richie, D.M. (1983). Problems in the theory of developmental sequences: Prerequisites and precursors. Human Development, 26, 156–172.
22.
Carpendale, J.E.M., & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of the mind: The development of children’s understanding of mind within social interactions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 79–150.
23.
Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
Csibra, G., & Gergely, C. (2007). ‘Obsessed with goals’: Functions and mechanisms of teleological interpretation of actions in humans. Acta Psychologica, 124, 60–78.
25.
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 148–153.
26.
Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perceptions of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237–267.
27.
De Bruin, L.C., & Newen, A. (2012). An association account of false belief understanding. Cognition, 123, 240–259.
28.
Elsner, B. (2007). Infants’ imitation of goal-directed actions: The role of movements and action effects. Acta Psychologica, 124, 44–59.
29.
Ewert, O.M. (1983). Eine historische Nachbemerkung zu Neuberger, Merz und Selg: Imitation bei Neugeborenen – eine kontroverse Befundlage. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 15, 277–279.
30.
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kiraly, I. (2001). Rational imitation of goal-directed actions in 14-month-olds. In J.D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of Cogsci 2001 (pp. 309–315). London: LEA.
31.
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Kiraly, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature, 415, 755.
32.
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naïve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 287–292.
33.
Gopnik, A., & Schulz, L. (2004). Mechanisms of theory formation in young children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 371–377.
34.
Guillaume, P. (1925). L’imitation chez l’enfant. Paris: Alcan.
35.
Hacker, P.M.S. (2010). Human nature: The categorical framework. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
36.
Haith, M.M. (1998). Who put the cog in infant cognition: Is rich interpretation too costly? Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 167–179.
37.
Hamlin, J.K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557–559.
38.
Harr, R., & Tissaw, M.A. (2005). Wittgenstein and psychology: A practical guide. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
39.
Heyes, C.M. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253–261.
40.
Heyes, C.M. (2009). Evolution, development and intentional control of imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 2293–2298.
41.
Hommel, B. (2009a). Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research, 73, 512–526.
42.
Hommel, B. (2009b). Conscious and unconscious control of spatial action. In W.P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness (pp. 171–181). Oxford: Elsevier.
43.
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.
44.
Jones, S.S. (2007). Imitation in infancy. The development of mimicry. Psychological Science, 18, 593–599.
45.
Jones, S.S. (2009). The development of imitation in infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364, 2325–2335.
46.
Jones, S.S., & Yoshida, H. (2011). Imitation in infancy and the acquisition of body knowledge. In V. Slaughter & C. Brownell (Eds.). Early development of body representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Kaminski, J., Nitzschner, M., Wobber, V., Tennie, C., Bräuer, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Can dogs distinguish rational from irrational acts? Animal Behaviour, 81, 195–203.
48.
Kiraly, I. (2009). The effect of the model’s presence and of negative evidence on infants’ selective imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 14–25.
49.
Klossek, U.M.H., Russell, J., & Dickinson, T. (2008). The control of instrumental action following outcome devaluation in young children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 39–51.
50.
Kovács, Á.M., Téglás, E., & Endress, A.D. (2010). The social sense: Susceptibly to others’ beliefs in human infants and adults. Science, 330, 1830–1834.
51.
Knudsen, B., & Liszkowski, U. (2012). Eighteen- and 24-month-old infants correct others in anticipation of action mistakes. Developmental Science, 15, 113–122.
52.
Kuhlmeier, V.A., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14, 402–408.
53.
Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Luo, Y. (2010). Do 8-month-old infants consider situational constraints when interpreting others’ gaze as goal-directed action? Infancy, 15, 392–419.
55.
Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2010). Toward a mentalistic account of early psychological reasoning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 301–307.
56.
Markman, E.M. (1990). Constraints children place on word meaning. Cognitive Science, 14, 57–77.
57.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.
58.
Meltzoff, A.N., & Moore, M.K. (1997). Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Early Development and Parenting, 6, 179–192.
59.
Moore, C. (2006). The development of commonsense psychology. Mahwah: LEA.
60.
Moore, C., Mealiea, J., Garon, N., & Povinelli, D. (2007). The development of body self-awareness. Infancy, 11, 157–174.
61.
Müller, U., & Giesbrecht, G. (2008). Methodological and epistemological issues in the interpretation of infant cognitive development. Child Development, 79, 1654–1658.
62.
Nachev, P., & Hacker, P.M.S. (2010). Covert cognition in the persistent vegetative state. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 91, 68–75.
63.
Nelson, C.A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development, 10, 3–18.
64.
Nielsen, M. (2006). Copying actions and copying outcomes: Social learning through the second year. Developmental Psychology, 42, 555–565.
65.
Onishi, K.H., & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science, 308, 255–258.
66.
Overton, W.F. (1998). Developmental psychology: Philosophy, concepts, and methodology. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R.M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 107–188). New York: Wiley.
67.
Paulus, M. (2011). Imitation in infancy: Conceptual considerations. Theory & Psychology, 21, 849–856.
68.
Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., van Wijngaarden, C., Vrins, S., van Rooij, I., & Bekkering, H. (2011a). The role of frequency information and teleological reasoning in infants’ and adults’ action prediction. Developmental Psychology, 47, 976–983.
69.
Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., Vissers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2011b). Imitation in infancy: Rational or motor resonance? Child Development, 82, 1047–1057.
70.
Paulus, M., Hunnius, S., Vissers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2011c). Bridging the gap between the other and me: The functional role of motor resonance and action effects in infants’ imitation. Developmental Science, 14, 901–910.
71.
Paulus, M., & Moore, C. (2011). Whom to ask for help? Children’s developing understanding of other people’s action capabilities. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 593–600.
72.
Perner, J., & Ruffman, T. (2005). Psychology. Infants’ insight into the mind: how deep? Science, 308, 214–216.
73.
Perner, J., Sprung, M., & Steinkogler, B. (2004). Counterfactual conditionals and false belief: A developmental dissociation. Journal of Cognition and Development, 19, 179–201.
74.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
75.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
76.
Povinelli, D.J., Bering, J.M., & Giambrone, S. (2000). Towards a science of other minds: Escaping the argument by analogy. Cognitive Science, 24, 509–541.
77.
Povinelli, D.J., & Giambrone, S. (1999). Inferring other minds: Failure of the argument by analogy. Philosophical Topics, 27, 167–201.
78.
Preyer, W. (1980). Die Seele des Kindes. Beobachtungen über die geistige Entwicklung des Menschen in den ersten Lebensjahren (3rd ed.). Leipzig: Grieben.
79.
Rafetseder, E., Cristi-Vargas, R., & Perner, J. (2010). Counterfactual reasoning: Developing a sense of ‘nearest possible world’. Child Development, 81, 376–389.
80.
Rakoczy, H. (2008). Pretence as individual and collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 23, 499–517.
81.
Rakoczy, H. (2012). Do infants have a theory of mind? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 59–74.
82.
Range, F., Virnayi, Z., & Huber, L. (2007). Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Current Biology, 17, 868–872.
83.
Ray, E., & Heyes, C.M. (2011). Imitation in infancy: The wealth of the stimulus. Developmental Science, 14, 92–105.
84.
Ridderinkhof, K.R., Forstmann, B.U., Wylie, S.A., Burle, B., & van den Wildenberg, W.P. M. (2011). Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: Resisting the call of the Sirens. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 174–192.
85.
Ridderinkhof, K.R., van den Wildenberg, W.P.M., Segalowitz, S.J., & Carter, C.S. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 129–140.
86.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: University Press.
87.
Schwier, C., van Maanen, C., Carpenter, M., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Rational imitation in 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 10, 303–311.
88.
Siegal, M., & Varley, R. (2008). If we could talk to the animals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 146–147.
89.
Sodian, B. (2011). Theory of mind in infancy. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 39–43.
90.
Thoermer, C., Sodian, B., Vuori, M., Perst, H., & Kristen, S. (2012). Continuity from an implicit to an explicit understanding of false belief from infancy to preschool age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 172–187.
91.
Tissaw, M.A. (2007). Making sense of neonatal imitation. Theory & Psychology, 17, 217–242.
92.
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–691.
93.
van Geert, P. (2004). Dynamic modeling of cognitive development. Time, situatedness and variability. In A. Demetriou & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Emergence and transformation in the mind: Modeling and measuring cognitive change (pp. 354–378). Mawah: Erlbaum.
94.
van Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Harvard: MIT Press.
95.
Verschoor, S.A., Weidema, M., Biro, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). Where do action goals come from? Evidence for spontaneous action-effect binding in infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 201.
96.
Vonk, J., & Subiaul, F. (2009). Do chimpanzees know what others can and cannot do? Reasoning about ‘capability’. Animal Cognition, 12, 267–286.
97.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
98.
Zelazo, P.D., Carlson, S.M., & Kesek, A. (2008). Development of executive function in childhood. In C.A. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 553–574). Cambridge: MIT Press.
99.
Zelazo, P.D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, Serial No. 274.
100.
Zmyj, N., Daum, M.M., & Aschersleben, G. (2009). The development of rational imitation in 9- and 12-month-old infants. Infancy, 14, 131–141.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.