Psychology has traditionally considered scientific objectivity to be enabled by the detachment and disembodiment of an observer at a distance. As an alternative, an embodied, relational stance of the observer to the observed provides understanding of mutual developmental processes not available through adhering to standard assumptions about objectivity. A textual analysis of Charles Darwin’s pronominal terms in the diary version of his observations on his oldest child, and in the published paper based on these observations, assessed the degree to which Darwin identified himself as detached observer or as embodied participant in these two texts. Results of the textual analysis indicated that, in the diary version, Darwin increasingly identified himself as embodied participant in interaction with his baby, in a manner coordinated with changes Darwin described in his baby’s recognition of himself and of Darwin. The embodied, relational vision which Darwin practiced as an observer of his child was not evident in the subsequently published scientific account. This paper demonstrates the value of textual analyses in elucidating possible disjunctions among a scientist’s observations, the mode of recording these observations, and the use the scientist makes of these recorded observations in texts written for scientific publication. Such analyses can aid in psychology’s examination of its assumptions concerning objectivity and subjectivity in science.

Keywords:
Charles Darwin, Development, Mutual recognition, Observation, Scientific objectivity, Textual analysis
This content is only available via PDF.
1998
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.