According to the standard interpretation concerning the role of the social in the theories of Vygotsky and Piaget, Piaget is a biological individualist whereas Vygotsky is a sociocultural collectivist. The mental is internal and private for Piaget but external and public for Vygotsky. Although this view appears to be mistaken, it does raise the question of how Piaget and Vygotsky conceive of the nature of the social in relation to the individual. The issue of individualism versus holism, and Piaget’s alternative of relationalism, are discussed, as well as Vygotsky’s much less clearly articulated views of the nature of the social, and it is concluded that these views seem very similar to Piaget’s. The issue of descriptive versus explanatory emergence is introduced, and Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s views on this issue are examined. Piaget seems to deny explanatory emergence, while Vygotsky appears to advocate it. This contrast leads to the question of domain-general versus domain-specific psychological principles and their relation to social principles.

Keywords:
Holism, Individualism, Piaget, Relationalism, Social, Vygotsky
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.