Developmentalists have overlooked the fundamental problem of the real impermanence of things. The question of the development of the rational understanding of impermanence is as yet unposed, despite the fact that the metaphor of impermanence is central to both Piagetian and neo-nativist accounts of representation. By claiming that young infants lacking representation treat absent objects as if they were destroyed or ‘impermanent’, Piaget created the impression that the development of representation resolves the impermanence problem. Discussions of conservation compound this confusion by interpreting young children’s beliefs in the destructibility of objects as failures of conservation, as if the development of the conservation concept could somehow do away with the real vulnerability of things. These confusions prevent consideration of the fundamental role that impermanence concepts play in many aspects of human experience and subjectivity. It is proposed here that the development of the rational concept of impermanence must be viewed as distinct from the development of conservation and logico-mathematical reversibility as conceived by Piaget.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.