Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Issues

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 2008, Vol. 66, No. 1

Original Article

Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113464

Case Report

Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113895
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000114249

Original Article

Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000114250
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000114251
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1159/000114252
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000114253
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1159/000115843
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000115844
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 44–46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000115845
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119091
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1159/000119643

Short Communication

Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000124275

Original Article

Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1159/000126494
Gynecol Obstet Invest (2008) 66 (1): 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1159/000134917
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal