Study Objective: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimal invasive surgical technique allowing a variety of gynecological procedures. The current literature describes improved patient comfort, improved better cosmetic results, and reduced operation time. This is a first study to assess pregnancy outcome after fertility-preserving vNOTES procedures. Design/Participants/Materials/Setting/Methods: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study including 125 patients under 43 years that underwent fertility-preserving vNOTES over a 5-year period (2014–2019). The gynecological surgical procedures included were vNOTES myomectomy, vNOTES salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, vNOTES unilateral adnexectomy, and vNOTES cystectomy. A total of 26 pregnancies in 21 cases were observed, with deliveries between 2015 and 2020. Results: Retrospective analysis in this patient group showed that 18 pregnancies were diagnosed within 1 year after vNOTES (85.7%). Mean interval between surgery and pregnancy was 6 months. Fertility treatment was performed in 28.6%. In the 26 observed pregnancies, no vNOTES-related complications were observed and delivery was at term in all cases. Mode of delivery was a vaginal delivery in twenty cases (76.9% of total) of which 2 cases vacuum assisted (7.7%) and a Caesarean section in 6 cases (23.1% of total). Two cases of trial of labor after Caesarean are described after vNOTES surgery, both ended in an uncomplicated vaginal delivery. In case of vaginal delivery, the perineum was intact in 15%, a mediolateral episiotomy was performed in 50 and 35% a grade 1–2 perineal rupture was described. No grade 3–4 perineal ruptures are described. Limitations: A limitation of this study is the retrospective design which does not correct for confounding factors. Further larger multicenter studies are needed to validate these data. Conclusions: This is the first study describing pregnancy outcome after fertility-preserving vNOTES procedures. vNOTES did not affect the mode of delivery or cause pregnancy-related complications. vNOTES did not increase the risk of extensive perineal tears during vaginal delivery. These preliminary data show no adverse events when vNOTES is performed in women of reproductive age. Posterior colpotomy as performed in all vNOTES procedures is by itself not an indication for an elective Caesarean section.

1.
Baekelandt
JF
,
De Mulder
PA
,
Le Roy
I
,
Mathieu
C
,
Laenen
A
,
Enzlin
P
,
Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial
.
BJOG
.
2019
;
126
(
1
):
105
13
. .
2.
Yang
CY
,
Shen
TC
,
Lin
CL
,
Chang
YY
,
Huang
CC
,
Lin
WC
.
Surgical outcomes of hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) compared with laparoscopic total hysterectomy (LTH) in women with non-prolapsed and benign uterine diseases
.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
.
2020
;
59
(
4
):
565
9
. .
3.
Kaya
C
,
Alay
I
,
Cengiz
H
,
Yıldız
GO
,
Baghaki
HS
,
Yasar
L
.
Comparison of hysterectomy cases performed via conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a paired sample cross-sectional study
.
J Obstet Gynaecol
.
2021
;
41
(
3
):
1
5
. .
4.
Kaya
C
,
Alay
I
,
Cengiz
H
,
Baghaki
S
,
Aslan
O
,
Ekin
M
,
Conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal pathologies: a paired sample cross-sectional study
.
J Invest Surg
.
2020
;
1
6
. Oline ahead of print. .
5.
Li
YC
,
Ku
FC
,
Kuo
HH
,
Tseng
HJ
,
Wang
CJ
.
Transvaginal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adnexectomy (TVEA vs. CLA): a propensity-matched study and literature review
.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
.
2017
;
56
(
3
):
336
41
. .
6.
Rovio
PH
,
Heinonen
PK
.
Pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal myomectomy by colpotomy
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
.
2012
;
161
(
2
):
130
3
. .
7.
Li
CB
,
Hua
KQ
.
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review
.
Asian J Surg
.
2020
;
43
(
1
):
44
51
. .
8.
Baekelandt
J
.
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to ovarian cystectomy
.
Fertil Steril
.
2018
;
109
(
2
):
366
. .
9.
Clavien
PA
,
Barkun
J
,
De Oliveira
ML
,
Vauthey
JN
,
Dindo
D
,
Schulick
RD
,
The clavien-dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience
.
Ann Surg
.
2009
;
250
(
2
):
187
96
. .
10.
Yang
YS
,
Hur
MH
,
Oh
KY
,
Kim
SY
.
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal masses
.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
.
2013
;
39
(
12
):
1604
9
. .
11.
Lee
CL
,
Wu
KY
,
Su
H
,
Ueng
SH
,
Yen
CF
.
Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2012
;
19
(
4
):
509
13
. .
12.
Baekelandt
JF
,
De Mulder
PA
,
Le Roy
I
,
Mathieu
C
,
Laenen
A
,
Enzlin
P
,
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
.
BMJ Open
.
2018
;
8
(
1
):
e018059
. .
13.
Devlieger
R
,
Goemaes
R
,
Laubach
M
.
Studie voor perinatale epidemiologie
.
Brussel
:
Perinatale Activiteiten in Vlaanderen 2019
;
2020
.
14.
Gaskins
AJ
,
Missmer
SA
,
Rich-Edwards
JW
,
Williams
PL
,
Souter
I
,
Chavarro
JE
.
Demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive risk factors for ectopic pregnancy
.
Fertil Steril
.
2018
;
110
(
7
):
1328
37
. .
15.
Dun
EC
,
Nezhat
CH
.
Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology
.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am
.
2012
;
39
(
4
):
551
66
.
16.
Kim
JS
,
Lee
CW
,
Yun
J
.
Lee
JH
,
Yun
BH
,
Park
JH
,
Use of the endometriosis fertility index to predict natural pregnancy after endometriosis surgery: a single-center study
.
Gynecol Obstet Invest
.
2019
;
84
(
1
):
86
93
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.