Introduction: Ectopic pregnancy is the most common cause of mortality during the first trimester of pregnancy, and intrauterine ectopic pregnancies show significantly higher morbidity and mortality than extrauterine ones. Despite being less invasive, safety and effectiveness of the hysteroscopic treatment are still unclear. Moreover, such approach is not standardized. We aimed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of hysteroscopic intact removal of angular or cesarean section scar pregnancies, defining a novel and markedly less invasive hysteroscopic technique with a 5-mm Bettocchi hysteroscope or a 3.5-mm Versascope hysteroscope. Materials and Methods: Medical records and video archives were reviewed for all the patients with angular or caesarean scar pregnancies treated with hysteroscopic intact removal technique from January 2000 to December 2018 at our Department. Success and complication rates were assessed. Results: Four patients with angular (n = 1) or cesarean scar pregnancy (n = 3) met inclusion criteria. Case #1 was treated with bipolar resectoscope, cases #2 and #3 with 5-mm Bettocchi hysteroscope, and case #4 with 3.5-mm Versascope hysteroscope. Cases #2–4 did not require cervical dilatation. Before hysteroscopic treatment, cases #2–4 underwent unsuccessful medical therapy with multiple-dose methotrexate. Hysteroscopic treatment success rate was 100%, while complication rate was 0%. All patients were treated with a novel technique: hysteroscopic intact removal of angular or cesarean scar pregnancies. Such technique was described step-by-step. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic treatment of angular and cesarean scar pregnancies may be a safe and effective minimally invasive option. The novel technique of hysteroscopic intact removal technique may allow a markedly less invasive approach.

1.
Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy
.
Green-top guideline no. 21
.
BJOG
.
2017 Dec
;
124
(
13
):
e314
.
2.
Arleo
EK
,
DeFilippis
EM
.
Cornual, interstitial, and angular pregnancies: clarifying the terms and a review of the literature
.
Clin Imaging
.
2014 Nov–Dec
;
38
(
6
):
763
70
. .
3.
Liao
CY
.
Distinguishing between interstitial and angular pregnancies: is there a role for saline infusion sonohysterography?
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
.
2018 Aug
;
57
(
4
):
605
7
. .
4.
Grant
A
,
Murji
A
,
Atri
M
.
Can the presence of a surrounding endometrium differentiate eccentrically located intrauterine pregnancy from interstitial ectopic pregnancy?
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
.
2017 Aug
;
39
(
8
):
627
34
. .
5.
Management of ectopic pregnancy. NICE 2019. Available from: https://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/ectopic-pregnancy-and-miscarriage (Accessed 05 Feb 2019)
.
6.
Gonzalez
N
,
Tulandi
T
.
Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2017 Jul–Aug
;
24
(
5
):
731
8
. .
7.
Fu
LP
.
Therapeutic approach for the cesarean scar pregnancy
.
Medicine
.
2018 May
;
97
(
18
):
e0476
. .
8.
Laus
K
,
Louis
P
,
Douglass
L
.
A novel approach to management of angular pregnancies: a case series
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2019 Jan
;
26
(
1
):
178
81
. .
9.
Von Elm
E
,
Altman
DG
,
Egger
M
,
Pocock
SJ
,
Gøtzsche
PC
,
Vandenbroucke
JP
.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
.
Int J Surg
.
2014
;
12
(
12
):
1495
9
. .
10.
Mollo
A
,
Conforti
A
,
Alviggi
C
,
De Placido
G
.
Successful direct bipolar resection of 6th week cesarean scar pregnancy: case report and literature review
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
.
2014 Aug
;
179
:
229
31
. .
11.
Mollo
A
,
Alviggi
C
,
Conforti
A
,
Insabato
L
,
De Placido
G
.
Intact removal of spontaneous twin ectopic Caesarean scar pregnancy by office hysteroscopy: case report and literature review
.
Reprod Biomed Online
.
2014 Nov
;
29
(
5
):
530
3
. .
12.
Mollo
A
,
Raffone
A
,
Improda
FP
,
Travaglino
A
,
Saccone
G
,
Giampaolino
P
, et al.
Hysteroscopic intact removal of an angular pregnancy with a 5Fr electrode
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2019 Jan
;
26
(
1
):
32
3
. .
13.
Kim
SY
,
Yoon
SR
,
Kim
MJ
,
Chung
JH
,
Kim
MY
,
Lee
SW
.
Cesarean scar pregnancy; diagnosis and management between 2003 and 2015 in a single center
.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol
.
2018 Oct
;
57
(
5
):
688
91
. .
14.
Chen
ZY
,
Li
XY
,
Zhao
D
,
Zhou
M
,
Xu
P
,
Huang
XF
, et al.
[Clinical analysis on hysteroscopic surgery for the treatment of type II cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester]
.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi
.
2017 Oct 25
;
52
(
10
):
669
74
. .
15.
Brown
K
,
Tkacz
Z
.
Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic management of caesarean scar (niche) defects in symptomatic patients
.
J Obstet Gynaecol
.
2018 Jul
;
38
(
5
):
730
. .
16.
Li
J
,
Li
X
,
Yu
H
,
Zhang
X
,
Xu
W
,
Yang
J
.
Combined laparoscopic and hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy with temporary occlusion of bilateral internal iliac arteries: a case report and literature review
.
Medicine
.
2018 Aug
;
97
(
32
):
e11811
. .
17.
Tarim
E
,
Ulusan
S
,
Kilicdag
E
,
Yildirim
T
,
Bagis
T
,
Kuscu
E
.
Angular pregnancy
.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
.
2004 Oct
;
30
(
5
):
377
9
. .
18.
Litta
P
,
Spiller
E
,
Saccardi
C
,
Ambrosini
G
,
Caserta
D
,
Cosmi
E
.
Resectoscope or versapoint for hysteroscopic metroplasty
.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
.
2008 Apr
;
101
(
1
):
39
42
.
Epub 2008 Feb 20
. .
19.
Vitale
SG
.
The biopsy snake grasper sec. VITALE: a new tool for office hysteroscopy
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2020
;
27
(
6
):
1414
16
.
[Epub ahead of print]
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.