Objectives: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive technique in benign gynaecologic surgery whereby surgical access to the peritoneal cavity is achieved through natural orifices, namely through a vaginal colpotomy. Experience in repeat vNOTES cases is limited and so far, repeat vNOTES cases have not been described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of vNOTES hysterectomy in women with a history of previous vNOTES adnexal surgery. Design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the first 11 repeat vNOTES cases in our centre. All vNOTES procedures, primary adnexal surgery as well as repeat vNOTES hysterectomy, were performed by one surgeon (J.B.). Materials, Setting, Methods: Between March 2016 and May 2020, 11 patients underwent a vNOTES hysterectomy after prior vNOTES adnexectomy or cystectomy in Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium. Relevant patient characteristics and outcome data were collected after written informed consent. Results: Median age was 49 years (range 44–65) at the moment of the first vNOTES procedure. Two patients had one or more caesarean sections in history, and 2 women were nulliparous. Median interval between primary and repeat vNOTES procedure was 15 months (range 0.8–37 months). All patients underwent a vaginally assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) as repeat vNOTES procedure. Performing a colpotomy and entering the peritoneal cavity after prior vNOTES was technically feasible in all cases. All VANHs were successfully performed. There were 3 minor complications after repeat vNOTES, of which one was anaesthesia-related. The 2 complications associated with the surgical procedure were both cystitis. In one of these 2 patients, there were high post-void residues, which were easily managed by bladder training. There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy, neither serious nor life-threatening complications. No ureteric, bladder, or intestinal injuries have occurred. Limitations: The retrospective design and small sample size are the main limitations of this study. Moreover, the follow-up period of the most recently operated patients was too short to draw conclusions on long-term outcomes, including sexual function. Conclusions: In all patients in this case series, vNOTES hysterectomy after prior vNOTES adnexal surgery was successfully performed. Large-scale prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of multiple consecutive vNOTES procedures in 1 patient.

1.
Hansdottir
K
,
Gudmundsson
JA
.
Trends in minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques for nonmalignant conditions in a defined population
.
Gynecol Obstet Invest
.
2018
;
83
(
2
):
198
202
.
2.
Chrysostomou
A
,
Djokovic
D
,
Edridge
W
,
van Herendael
BJ
.
Evidence-based guidelines for vaginal hysterectomy of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE)
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
.
2018 Dec
;
231
:
262
7
.
3.
Tchartchian
G
,
Heldmann
P
,
Bojahr
B
,
Larbig
A
,
De Wilde
RL
.
The laparoscopic-assisted combined hysterectomy: a new surgical concept compared to the classical laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy by a prospective study
.
Gynecol Obstet Invest
.
2017
;
82
(
3
):
223
9
.
4.
Yang
E
,
Nie
D
,
Li
Z
.
Comparison of major clinical outcomes between transvaginal NOTES and traditional laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
J Surg Res
.
2019 Dec
;
244
:
278
90
.
5.
Rattner
D
,
Kalloo
A
,
ASGE/SAGES Working Group
.
ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. October 2005
.
Surg Endosc
.
2006 Feb
;
20
(
2
):
329
33
.
6.
Baekelandt
JF
,
De Mulder
PA
,
Le Roy
I
,
Mathieu
C
,
Laenen
A
,
Enzlin
P
,
.
Hysterectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopy as a day-care procedure: a randomised controlled trial
.
BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol
.
2019 Jan
;
126
(
1
):
105
13
.
7.
Baekelandt
J
,
De Mulder
PA
,
Le Roy
I
,
Mathieu
C
,
Laenen
A
,
Enzlin
P
,
.
HALON-hysterectomy by transabdominal laparoscopy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a randomised controlled trial (study protocol)
.
BMJ Open
.
2016 Aug
;
6
(
8
):
e011546
.
8.
Baekelandt
JF
,
De Mulder
PA
,
Le Roy
I
,
Mathieu
C
,
Laenen
A
,
Enzlin
P
,
.
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) adnexectomy for benign pathology compared with laparoscopic excision (NOTABLE): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
.
BMJ Open
.
2018 Jan
;
8
(
1
):
e018059
.
9.
Uccella
S
,
Cromi
A
,
Bogani
G
,
Casarin
J
,
Serati
M
,
Ghezzi
F
.
Transvaginal specimen extraction at laparoscopy without concomitant hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2013 Sep–Oct
;
20
(
5
):
583
90
.
10.
Tolcher
MC
,
Kalogera
E
,
Hopkins
MR
,
Weaver
AL
,
Bingener
J
,
Dowdy
SC
.
Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery
.
JSLS
.
2012 Jul–Sep
;
16
(
3
):
413
20
.
11.
Panait
L
,
Wood
SG
,
Bell
RL
,
Duffy
AJ
,
Roberts
KE
.
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in the morbidly obese
.
Surg Endosc
.
2013 Jul
;
27
(
7
):
2625
9
.
12.
Baekelandt
J
,
De Mulder
PA
,
Le Roy
I
,
Mathieu
C
,
Laenen
A
,
Enzlin
P
,
.
Postoperative outcomes and quality of life following hysterectomy by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) compared to laparoscopy in women with a non-prolapsed uterus and benign gynaecological disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
.
2017 Jan
;
208
:
6
15
.
13.
Lee
CL
,
Wu
KY
,
Su
H
,
Ueng
SH
,
Yen
CF
.
Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in adnexal procedures
.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
.
2012 Jul–Aug
;
19
(
4
):
509
13
.
14.
Clark
LE
,
Menderes
G
,
Tower
AM
,
Silasi
DA
,
Azodi
M
.
A simple approach to specimen retrieval via posterior colpotomy incision
.
JSLS
.
2015
;
19
(
2
):
e2015.00222
.
You do not currently have access to this content.