Background: The progression of labor and delivery of the fetus is dependent upon uterine contractions and the voluntary effort of abdominal muscle contractions. A good monitor of uterine contractions and pushing is necessary for obstetrical care. Electromyography (EMG) is the underlying basis for contractility of muscle including the myometrium. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between EMG activity of uterine and abdominal muscles and the duration of the 2nd stage of labor in pregnant women. Methods: EMG of both uterine and abdominal muscles was simultaneously recorded from electrodes placed on the abdominal surface of 45 active 2nd stage-laboring nulliparous patients. EMG was recorded using filters to separate uterine and abdominal EMG signals, and various EMG signal parameters were analyzed. The duration of the 2nd stage of labor and other maternal and fetal characteristics were also recorded. Results: Uterine EMG bursts precede abdominal bursts and are accompanied by feelings of “urge to push” by the patients. Abdominal root mean square (RMS) and power, but not uterine EMG parameters, are reduced (p< 0.005) in patients with longer labors and linear regression analysis demonstrated a negative correlation to the duration of 2nd stage of labor (p < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis of clinical characteristics (fetal weight, body mass index, placental location, etc.) and parameters of EMG showed that only abdominal RMS is negatively correlated with the duration of labor. Conclusions: (1) Uterine and abdominal EMG activities reflect the expulsive involuntary (uterine) and voluntary (abdominal) muscular activities during the 2nd stage of labor. (2) RMS and power of abdominal EMG diminish with longer labor when uterine EMG intensities are similar. (3) Recording of uterine and abdominal muscle activity provides objective evaluation of the muscle activity during the 2nd stage of labor and may aid in the evaluation of any interventions.

1.
Roberts JE, Goldstein SA, Gruener JS, Maggio M, Mendez-Bauer C. A descriptive analysis of involuntary bearing-down efforts during the expulsive phase of labor.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
. 1987 Jan-Feb;16(1):48–55.
2.
Liao JB, Buhimschi CS, Norwitz ER. Normal labor: mechanism and duration [vii.].
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am
. 2005 Jun;32(2):145–64.
3.
Enhorning G. Simultaneous recording of intravesical and intra-urethral pressure. A study on urethral closure in normal and stress incontinent women.
Acta Chir Scand Suppl
. 1961; Suppl 276:1–68.
4.
Nyman CR, Sjöberg B. Direct transmural measurement of the detrusor pressure. A technique of detrusor pressure recording in micturition with intravesical and prevesical suprapubic catheters compared with recordings using a rectal balloon and rectal open-end catheters.
Invest Urol
. 1981 Mar;18(5):392–5.
5.
Amarenco G, Ismael SS, Lagauche D, Raibaut P, Rene-Corail P, Wolff N, et al. Cough anal reflex: strict relationship between intravesical pressure and pelvic floor muscle electromyographic activity during cough. Urodynamic and electrophysiological study.
J Urol
. 2005 Jan;173(1):149–52.
6.
Demaria F, Porcher R, Ismael SS, Amarenco G, Fritel X, Madelenat P, et al. Using intercostal muscle EMG to quantify maternal expulsive efforts during vaginal delivery: a pilot study.
Neurourol Urodyn
. 2004;23(7):675–8.
7.
Weinberg SL. Ambulatory monitoring of arrhythmias.
Cardiovasc Clin
. 1975;6(3):121–32.
8.
Pérez-Riera AR, de Lucca AA, Barbosa-Barros R, Yanowitz FG, de Cano SF, Cano MN, et al. Value of electro-vectorcardiogram in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol
. 2013 Jul;18(4):311–26.
9.
Mills KR. Power spectral analysis of electromyogram and compound muscle action potential during muscle fatigue and recovery.
J Physiol
. 1982 May;326(1):401–9.
10.
Vera-Garcia FJ, Grenier SG, McGill SM. Abdominal muscle response during curl-ups on both stable and labile surfaces.
Phys Ther
. 2000 Jun;80(6):564–9.
11.
Mohseni Bandpei MA, Rahmani N, Majdoleslam B, Abdollahi I, Ali SS, Ahmad A. Reliability of surface electromyography in the assessment of paraspinal muscle fatigue: an updated systematic review.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther
. 2014 Sep;37(7):510–21.
12.
Shafik A, Shafik IA, El Sibai O, Shafik AA. Electromyographic study of the anterolateral abdominal wall muscles during ejaculation.
J Sex Med
. 2007 Jul;4(4 Pt 1):1022–7.
13.
Shafik A, El Sibai O, Shafik IA, Shafik AA. Electromyographic activity of the anterolateral abdominal wall muscles during rectal filling and evacuation.
J Surg Res
. 2007 Dec;143(2):364–7.
14.
Garfield RE, Maner WL, Maul H, Saade GR. Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients.
BJOG
. 2005 Mar;112 Suppl 1:103–8.
15.
Garfield RE, Maner WL, MacKay LB, Schlembach D, Saade GR. Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients versus term labor patients.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2005 Jul;193(1):23–9.
16.
Trojner Bregar A, Lucovnik M, Verdenik I, Jager F, Gersak K, Garfield RE. Uterine electromyography during active phase compared with latent phase of labor at term.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
. 2016 Feb;95(2):197–202.
17.
Maner WL, Garfield RE, Maul H, Olson G, Saade G. Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography.
Obstet Gynecol
. 2003 Jun;101(6):1254–60.
18.
Eswaran H, Preissl H, Wilson JD, Murphy P, Lowery CL. Prediction of labor in term and preterm pregnancies using non-invasive magnetomyographic recordings of uterine contractions.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2004 Jun;190(6):1598–602; discussion 1602–3.
19.
Lucovnik M, Maner WL, Chambliss LR, Blumrick R, Balducci J, Novak-Antolic Z, et al. Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2011 Mar;204(3):228.e1–10.
20.
Euliano TY, Marossero D, Nguyen MT, Euliano NR, Principe J, Edwards RK. Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2009 Jan;200(1):54.e1–7.
21.
Buhimschi CS. Spatiotemporal electromyography during human labor to monitor propagation of the uterine contraction wave and diagnose dystocia.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2009 Jan;200(1):1–3.
22.
Vasak B, Graatsma EM, Hekman-Drost E, Eijkemans MJ, van Leeuwen JH, Visser GH, et al. Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2013 Sep;209(3):232.e1–8.
23.
Oliveira BD, de Andrade AD, Lemos A, Brito VC, Pedrosa ML, Silva TN. Abdominal muscle electrical activity during labor expulsive stage: a cross-sectional study.
Rev Bras Fisioter
. 2011 Nov-Dec;15(6):445–51.
24.
Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA, Malinow AM, Kopelman JN, Weiner CP. Pushing in labor: performance and not endurance.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
. 2002 Jun;186(6):1339–44.
25.
Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, de Souza AI, Cabral Filho JE, Correia JB. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
. 2015 Oct;(10):CD009124.
26.
Thomas K, Lee RY. Fatigue of abdominal and paraspinal muscles during sustained loading of the trunk in the coronal plane.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
. 2000 Jul;81(7):916–20.
27.
Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M. Analysis of muscular fatigue and foot stability during high-heeled gait.
Gait Posture
. 2002 Feb;15(1):56–63.
28.
Gayda M, Merzouk A, Choquet D, Ahmaidi S. Assessment of skeletal muscle fatigue in men with coronary artery disease using  -surface electromyography during isometric contraction of quadriceps muscles.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
. 2005 Feb;86(2):210–5.
29.
Baum K, Hildebrandt U, Edel K, Bertram R, Hahmann H, Bremer FJ, et al. Comparison of skeletal muscle strength between cardiac patients and age-matched healthy controls.
Int J Med Sci
. 2009 Jul;6(4):184–91.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.