Background: Minimally invasive surgery is the preferred approach for performing many gynecologic procedures. Occasionally, supraumbilical port placement may be preferable to optimize visibility and maneuverability although the risks of complications are less well characterized compared to umbilical entry. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of computed tomograms from 92 patients to evaluate the anatomic considerations for umbilical and supraumbilical port entry based on patient age, body mass index (BMI), parity, abdominal wall thickness, and distance to the great vessels. Results: Supraumbilical entry was not associated with differences in distance to the great vessels compared to the umbilicus. However, supraumbilical location and BMI were associated with greater abdominal wall thickness. Age and BMI were associated with greater distance to the great vessels, while age was associated with thinner abdominal wall. Multiple linear regression confirmed independent effects of age and BMI. No association between parity and distance to retroperitoneal vessels was observed. Conclusion: Younger patients may be at increased risk for great vessel injury and pre-peritoneal insufflation. Obese patients may be at risk for pre-peritoneal insufflation, while patients with BMI < 30, particularly with a skin-to-aorta distance < 7 cm, may be at an increased risk for great vessel injury. Surgeons should consider these factors when considering supraumbilical port entry.

1.
Fuller J, Ashar BS, Carey-Corrado J: Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: an analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 302–307.
2.
Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, Vilos G, Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Arneja J, Birch C, Dempsey T: Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007; 29: 433–447.
3.
Pickett SD, Rodewald KJ, Billow MR, Giannios NM, Hurd WW: Avoiding major vessel injury during laparoscopic instrument insertion. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2010; 37: 387–397.
4.
Saville LE, Woods MS: Laparoscopy and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries (MRVI). Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 1096–1100.
5.
Blaney MW, Calton WC, North JH Jr: The effects of preperitoneal carbon dioxide insufflation on cardiopulmonary function in pigs. JSLS 1999; 3: 49–55.
6.
Roy GM, Bazzurini L, Solima E, Luciano AA: Safe technique for laparoscopic entry into the abdominal cavity. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2001; 8: 519–528.
7.
Ahmad G, Gent D, Henderson D, O’Flynn H, Phillips K, Watson A: Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 8: CD006583.
8.
Hurd WW, Bude RO, DeLancey JO, Pearl ML: The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 48–51.
9.
Stanhiser J, Goodman L, Soto E, Al-Aref I, Wu J, Gojayev A, Nutter B, Falcone T: Supraumbilical primary trocar insertion for laparoscopic access: the relationship between points of entry and retroperitoneal vital vasculature by imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 506.e1–e5.
10.
Jeong JY, Kim YR, Kim JY, Jee BC, Kim SH: Vertical distance between umbilicus to aortic bifurcation on coronal view in Korean women. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014; 57: 44–49.
11.
Choi JS, Kyung YS, Kim KH, Lee KW, Han JS: The four-trocar method for performing laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy on large uteri. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 276–280.
12.
Sinha R, Sundaram M: Laparoscopic management of large myomas. J Gynecol Endosc Surg 2009; 1: 73–82.
13.
Macciò A, Madeddu C, Kotsonis P, Pietrangeli M, Paoletti AM: Large twisted ovarian fibroma associated with Meigs’ syndrome, abdominal pain and severe anemia treated by laparoscopic surgery. BMC Surg 2014; 14: 38.
14.
Tazuke SI, Nezhat FR, Nezhat CH, Seidman DS, Phillips DR, Nezhat CR: Laparoscopic management of pelvic pathology during pregnancy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997; 4: 605–608.
15.
Mathevet P, Nessah K, Dargent D, Mellier G: Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in pregnancy: a case series. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 108: 217–222.
16.
Jain N, Sareen S, Kanawa S, Jain V, Gupta S, Mann S: Jain point: a new safe portal for laparoscopic entry in previous surgery cases. J Hum Reprod Sci 2016; 9: 9–17.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.