Aims: To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of being underweight before pregnancy. Methods: Cohort study of a large population-based dataset of singleton births was used to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of pre-gravid underweight body mass index (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) women with pre-gravid normal weight controls (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2). Results: A total of 10,995 pre-gravid underweight and 146,155 pre-gravid normal weight mothers were compared. The mean maternal age and gestational age were not different but lean mothers were significantly and more frequently primiparous, had a higher incidence of births at <36 and <32 weeks' gestation, and had a significantly higher incidence of low and very low birth weight infants. Lean mothers had a significantly lower incidence of birth weights >4,000 g, less cesarean births and a lower incidence of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders. Conclusions: A tradeoff exists between the advantages of being lean before pregnancy in terms of less maternal morbidity in return for gaining a more advanced gestational age and higher birth weight.

Keywords:
Hypertensive disorders, Low birth weight, Preterm birth, Gestational diabetes, Underweight
1.
WHO: Controlling the global obesity epidemic.http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/obesity/en/ (accessed March 1, 2016).
2.
Edwards LE, Alton IR, Barrada MI, Hakanson EY: Pregnancy in the underweight woman. Course, outcome, and growth patterns of the infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:297-302.
3.
WHO: Maternal anthropometry and pregnancy outcomes. A WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73(suppl):1-98.
4.
Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris J, Regan L, Robinson S: Is maternal underweight really a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome? A population-based study in London. BJOG 2001;108:61-66.
5.
Doherty DA, Magann EF, Francis J, Morrison JC, Newnham JP: Pre-pregnancy body mass index and pregnancy outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;95:242-247.
6.
Bhattacharya S, Campbell DM, Liston WA, Bhattacharya S: Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women delivering singleton babies. BMC Public Health 2007;7:168.
7.
Institute of Medicine: Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington, National Academies Press, 2009.
8.
Tul N, Bregar AT, Steblovnik L, Verdenik I, Lucovnik M, Blickstein I: A population-based comparison between actual maternal weight gain and the Institute of Medicine weight gain recommendations in singleton pregnancies. J Perinat Med 2016;44:389-392.
9.
Tabet M, Flick LH, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Chang JJ: Prepregnancy body mass index in a first uncomplicated pregnancy and outcomes of a second pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:548.e1-e7.
10.
Hoellen F, Hornemann A, Haertel C, Reh A, Rody A, Schneider S, Tuschy B, Bohlmann MK: Does maternal underweight prior to conception influence pregnancy risks and outcome? In Vivo 2014;28:1165-1170.
11.
Watson M, Howell S, Johnston T, Callaway L, Khor SL, Cornes S: Pre-pregnancy BMI: costs associated with maternal underweight and obesity in Queensland. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013;53:243-249.
12.
Siega-Riz AM, Deierlein A, Stuebe A: Implementation of the new institute of medicine gestational weight gain guidelines. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010;55:512-519.
13.
Fujiwara K, Aoki S, Kurasawa K, Okuda M, Takahashi T, Hirahara F: Associations of maternal pre-pregnancy underweight with small-for-gestational-age and spontaneous preterm birth, and optimal gestational weight gain in Japanese women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014;40:988-994.
14.
Lucovnik M, Blickstein I, Verdenik I, Steblovnik L, Trojner Bregar A, Tul N: Impact of pre-gravid body mass index and body mass index change on preeclampsia and gestational diabetes in singleton and twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1901-1904.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.