Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for operative vaginal delivery and to propose a new nomogram for predicting the risk. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1,955 pregnancies that occurred in our clinic between the years 2007 and 2008. Included were singleton pregnancies with labor diagnosis after the 36th gestational week in which spontaneous or operative vaginal deliveries occurred. In this study, the operative delivery was carried out exclusively by vacuum extraction. Results: After univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression stepwise model selection, maternal age, nulliparity, medically assisted procreation, gestational age at birth, male fetus, epidural analgesia and medical induction of labor were found to be the most predictive variables for operative vaginal delivery. Considering these factors we propose a new nomogram for an objectified determination of the risk of operative vaginal delivery. Conclusions: The new nomogram we propose could be an important tool for an objectified determination of the risk of operative vaginal delivery by vacuum extraction in individualized patient counseling.

1.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: Operative vaginal delivery (Green-top Guideline No. 26). https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg26/.
2.
Stephenson PA, Bakoula C, Hemminki E, Knudsen L, Levasseur M, Schenker J, et al: Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countries. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1993;7:45-54.
3.
O'Grady JP, Pope CS, Hoffman DE: Forceps delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002;16:1-16.
4.
Vacca A: Vacuum-assisted delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002;16:17-30.
5.
O'Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V: Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;11: CD005455.
6.
Hehir MP, Reidy FR, Wilkinson MN, Mahony R: Increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery across two decades: accompanying outcomes and instrument preferences. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;171:40-43.
7.
Macleod M, Murphy DJ: Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy - a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;136:178-183.
8.
Elvander C, Ekeus C, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Cnattingius S: Reason for the increasing use of vacuum extraction in Sweden: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:1175-1182.
9.
Raisanen S, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Cartwright R, Gissler M, Heinonen S: Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries - a retrospective register-based study in Finland. BJOG 2012;119:1370-1378.
10.
Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N, Sphel M, Toppet V, Murillo D, et al: Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:626-633.
11.
Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al: Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:98-113.
12.
Fruscalzo A, Salmeri MG, Cendron A, Londero AP, Zanni G: Introducing routine trial of labour after caesarean section in a second level hospital setting. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25:1442-1446.
13.
Driul L, Londero AP, Salvador S, Fruscalzo A, Peris Bhat SA, Citossi A, et al: Retrospective analysis of one year of cesarean sections: indications and risk factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section. Minerva Ginecol 2010;62:403-414.
14.
Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Frohlich C, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Schmitz R: Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success. Ultraschall Med 2015;36:65-73.
15.
Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Fruscalzo A, Driul L, Delneri C, Calcagno A, et al: Impact of episiotomy on pelvic floor disorders and their influence on women's wellness after the sixth month postpartum: a retrospective study. BMC Womens Health 2011;11:12.
16.
Fruscalzo A, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Biasioli A, Driul L, Kiesel L, et al: Menstrual abnormalities and predisposition to pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders: a retrospective study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2010;26:445-450.
17.
Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM: The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). Hypertens Pregnancy 2001;20:IX-XIV.
18.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1122-1133.
19.
Londero AP, Bertozzi S, Visentin S, Fruscalzo A, Driul L, Marchesoni D: High placental index and poor pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 18,386 pregnancies. Gynecol Endocrinol 2013;29:666-669.
20.
Gallo V, Egger M, McCormack V, Farmer PB, Ioannidis JP, Kirsch-Volders M, et al: STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology - Molecular Epidemiology (STROBE-ME): an extension of the STROBE Statement. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001117.
21.
Lubsen J, Pool J, van der Does E: A practical device for the application of a diagnostic or prognostic function. Methods Inf Med 1978;17:127-129.
22.
Yeomans ER: Operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:645-653.
23.
Salvador S, Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Driul L, Da Riol R, Marchesoni D: Outcome of pregnancy for immigrant women: a retrospective study (in Italian). Minerva Ginecol 2010;62:277-285.
24.
Mazouni C, Porcu G, Bretelle F, Loundou A, Heckenroth H, Gamerre M: Risk factors for forceps delivery in nulliparous patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:298-301.
25.
Roberts CL, Algert CS, Carnegie M, Peat B: Operative delivery during labour: trends and predictive factors. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16:115-123.
26.
Turcot L, Marcoux S, Fraser WD: Multivariate analysis of risk factors for operative delivery in nulliparous women. Canadian Early Amniotomy Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:395-402.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.