Background: To compare the accuracy of 18 formulas in predicting fetal weight and also to make a comparison of these formulas in low-birth-weight fetuses (<2,500 g) and in fetuses weighing >4,000 g. Methods: Four-hundred-and-ninety-five pregnant patients were enrolled. The estimated fetal weight was calculated using 18 different formulas. The mean percentage error, the mean absolute percentage error and reliability analysis were used to compare the performance of the formulas. Results: The Cronbach's alpha was the highest in the formulas Hadlock I (0.977 (95% CI = 0.972-0.980)), Hadlock III (0.977 (95% CI = 0.972-0.980)) and Ott (0.975 (95% CI = 0.970-0.979)) in all fetuses. It was the highest in formulas Ott (0.383 (95% CI = 0.091-0.581)), Hadlock IV (0.371 (95% CI = 0.074-0.572)) and Combs (0.369 (95% CI = 0.071-0.571)) in fetuses >4,000 g. It was the highest in formulas Coombs (0.957 (95% CI = 0.940-0.569)), Ott (0.956 (95% CI = 0.939-0.968)) and Hadlock IV (95% CI = 0.956 (0.938-0.968)) in fetuses <2,500 g. Conclusion: We noted that formulas Hadlock I, Hadlock III and Ott may be used to predict the estimated fetal weight accurately in all fetuses in our study. Formulas Ott, Hadlock IV and Coombs may be preferred to predict EFW in fetuses <2,500 g and >4,000 g. Better formulas should be developed to predict the fetal weight in fetuses >4,000 g.

1.
Campbell S, Wilkin D: Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:689-697.
2.
Combs CA, Jaekle RK, Rosenn B, Pope M, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:365-370.
3.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984;150:535-540.
4.
Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK: Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333-337.
5.
Higginbottom J: Estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Med Biol 1977;3:59.
6.
Merz E, Lieser H, Schicketanz KH, Harle J: [Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight]. Ultraschall Med 1988;9:15-24.
7.
Ott WJ, Doyle S, Flamm S, Wittman J: Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Prospective analysis of new ultrasonic formulas. Am J Perinatol 1986;3:307-310.
8.
Rose BI, McCallum WD: A simplified method for estimating fetal weight using ultrasound measurements. Obstet Gynecol 1987;69:671-675.
9.
Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC: An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:47-54.
10.
Thurnau GR, Tamura RK, Sabbagha R, Depp OR 3rd, Dyer A, Larkin R, Lee T, Laughlin C: A simple estimated fetal weight equation based on real-time ultrasound measurements of fetuses less than thirty-four weeks' gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;145:557-561.
11.
Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Rodis JF, Bors-Koefoed R, Nochimson DJ: Fetal weight estimation formulas with head, abdominal, femur, and thigh circumference measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;157:410-414.
12.
Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC: The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;128:881-892.
13.
Warsof SL, Wolf P, Coulehan J, Queenan JT: Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements. Obstet gynecol 1986;67:569-573.
14.
Weiner CP, Sabbagha RE, Vaisrub N, Socol ML: Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length. Obstet Gynecol 1985;65:812-817.
15.
Woo JS, Wan MC: An evaluation of fetal weight prediction using a simple equation containing the fetal femur length. J Ultrasound Med 1986;5:453-457.
16.
Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA: Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia? J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9:55-61.
17.
Faschingbauer F, Beckmann MW, Goecke TW, Yazdi B, Siemer J, Schmid M, Mayr A, Schild RL: A new formula for optimized weight estimation in extreme fetal macrosomia (≥4500 g). Ultraschall Med 2012;33:480-488.
18.
Hart NC, Hilbert A, Meurer B, Schrauder M, Schmid M, Siemer J, Voigt M, Schild RL: Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35:42-47.
19.
Hoopmann M, Abele H, Wagner N, Wallwiener D, Kagan KO: Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:204-213.
20.
Lalys L, Pineau JC, Guihard-Costa AM: Small and large foetuses: identification and estimation of foetal weight at delivery from third-trimester ultrasound data. Early Hum Dev 2010;86:753-757.
21.
George D, Mallery P: SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 11.0 update, ed 4. Boston, Allyn & Bacon, 2003.
22.
Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R: Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g. J Perinat Med 2004;32:155-161.
23.
Burd I, Srinivas S, Pare E, Dharan V, Wang E: Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection? J Ultrasound Med 2009;28:1019-1024.
24.
Weissmann-Brenner A, Simchen MJ, Zilberberg E, Kalter A, Weisz B, Achiron R, Dulitzky M: Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies. Med Sci Monit 2012;18:PH77-PH81.
25.
Saucedo R, Zarate A, Basurto L, Hernandez M, Puello E, Campos S, Moreno E: Women with gestational diabetes develop glucose intolerance with high frequency within one year postpartum. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2012;73:58-62.
26.
McCormick MC, Litt JS, Smith VC, Zupancic JA: Prematurity: an overview and public health implications. Annu Rev Public Health 2011;32:367-379.
27.
Mutz-Dehbalaie I, Scheier M, Jerabek-Klestil S, Brantner C, Windbichler GH, Leitner H, Egle D, Ramoni A, Oberaigner W: Perinatal mortality and advanced maternal age. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014;77:50-57.
28.
Fukuda M, Tanaka T, Kamada M, Hayashi A, Yamashita Y, Terai Y, Ohmichi M: Comparison of the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2013;76:203-208.
29.
Basha AS, Abu-Khader IB, Qutishat RM, Amarin ZO: Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation within 14 days of delivery in a Jordanian population using hadlock formula 1. Med Princ Pract 2012;21:366-369.
30.
Benavides-Serralde A, Hernandez-Andrade E, Fernandez-Lara A, Figueras F, Moreno-Alvarez O, Camargo-Marin L, Acevedo-Gallegos S, Gallardo-Gaona J, Velazquez-Torres B, Guzman-Huerta M: Accuracy of different equations for estimating fetal weight. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011;72:264-268.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.