Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping is usually performed on cytological specimens with the aim of discerning between high- and low-risk genotypes. Methods: Paraffin-embedded sections (n = 241) comprising 16 normal/benign (N/B) cervical sections, 72 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 133 high-grade SIL (HSIL), 6 invasive carcinomas (cervical cancer), and 14 atypical immature metaplasias (AIMs) were DNA extracted and HPV genotyped. Results: The most frequent HPV genotypes found were 16 and 58. HPV16 was detected in 0% N/B, 18.1% LSIL, 42.9% HSIL (p < 0.001), 50% carcinoma, and 35.7% AIM, whilst HPV58 was detected in 25.0, 20.8, 16.5, 0 and 35.7% of these lesions, respectively. Discussion: The high prevalence of HPV58 and the low prevalence of HPV18 suggest the limited effectiveness of HPV vaccination in southeast Spain (prevention of 45.1% HSILs). The HPV genotype distribution profile in AIM suggests that these lesions are more similar to LSIL than HSIL pointing to a low risk of progression to cervical cancer. These results reinforce the necessity of assessing the specific genotype rather than distinguishing between high- or low-risk HPV. The use of histological section instead of cytological specimens for specific HPV genotyping would be very useful in order to ascertain the oncogenic potential of each of the genotypes found in a given area.

Keywords:
Human papillomavirus, Genotype distribution, Paraffin-embedded specimens, Squamous intraepithelial lesion, Metaplasia, atypical immature
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.