Aim: To investigate Doppler flow patterns of renal interlobar veins (RIV) in left (L) and right (R) kidney in relation to gestational age and to intrarenal pyelocalyceal diameters (PCD). Methods: Cross-sectional study involving 6 groups of women: (1) non-pregnant women, women pregnant between weeks (2) 11–14, (3) 18–23, (4) 28–33, (5) 37–40 and (6) women <5 days post delivery. During standardized renal duplex ultrasound scan, PCD (mm) was measured and venous impedance index (VI = [peak flow (PV) – presystolic flow]/PV) of RIV was defined. Comparison between L and R kidney was performed by repeated-measures analysis of variance for VI and by t tests for PCD. Results: A total of 150 women were examined, 25 in each group. In the early third trimester of pregnancy, L VI was significantly higher than R VI (0.38 ± 0.01 vs. 0.33 ± 0.01, p < 0.0001) and L PCD was significantly lower than R PCD (3.90 ± 3.68 vs. 6.25 ± 4.03, p = 0.03). Conclusion: RIV Doppler flow is different between left and right kidney only in the third trimester of pregnancy. This difference is inversely related to PCD, which may be explained by pelvic compression from the gravid uterus.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.