Association among angiogenesis, survival and clinicopathologic parameters in endometrial carcinoma was evaluated. Sixty patients who had been diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma, from 1993 to 1998, were included in the study. All patients had been surgically staged with bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection. All hysterectomy specimens were stained immunohistologically for factor VIII-related antigen. The area with the most intensified microvasculature was determined under low-power (×100) magnification, and the microvessel count of this area under high-power (×200) magnification was determined as the microvessel density (MVD) of the tumor. The mean MVD was 26.2 ± 13.0 (range 6–68), and it was considered as high (n = 24; 40%), moderate (n = 19; 31.7%) and low (n = 17; 28.3%) when the MVD was >30, between 15–30 and <15, respectively. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman rank correlation tests. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the difference between angiogenesis and survival. Multivariate analysis with the Cox regression model was used in MVD values and different clinicopathological parameters. There was positive correlation between MVD increase and surgicopathological stage (p < 0.05). A significant difference was seen between MVD increase and lymph node metastasis (p < 0.05). There were no differences between MVD and age, histological type, grade and lymphovascular invasion. MVD did not change in association with myometrial invasion depth. There was a significant difference in means of survival between the low and high MVD groups (p = 0.01). However, MVD was not an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. Increased angiogenesis was found to be associated with advanced stage and decreased survival in endometrial carcinoma.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.