Objective: To assess the value of ultrasound measurement of twin dividing membrane thickness in predicting chorionicity and perinatal outcome. To compare magnified with unmagnified images, and measurements taken with dividing membranes parallel and perpendicular to the ultrasound beam. Methods: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of twin-pregnancy ultrasound examinations during the second and third trimesters with chorionicity confirmed by a pathologist. Ultrasound measurements of the dividing membrane thickness were recorded in 44 twin pregnancies using unmagnified and magnified images. Measurements were taken at various membrane sites either horizontal or vertical to the ultrasound beam, depending on the orientation of the dividing membrane. We compared the mean membrane thickness between monochorionic and dichorionic pregnancies as well as between pregnancies with good and adverse perinatal outcome. Results: Membranes were significantly thicker in dichorionic pregnancies when compared with the monochorionic pregnancies (2.35 vs. 1.69 mm, p = 0.021). A cut-off point of ≧2.0 mm provided a sensitivity of 75.7%, a specificity of 85.7%, a positive predictive value of 96.6%, and a negative predictive value of 40.0%, for determining dichorionicity. Two of 7 monochorionic and 24 of 37 dichorionic pregnancies (59.1%) had good perinatal outcome. These pregnancies had significantly thicker membranes (2.44 vs. 1.96 mm, p = 0.022). Even among the dichorionic pregnancies, a membrane thicker than 2.2 mm was associated with a significantly higher proportion with good perinatal outcome (80.0 vs. 47.1%, relative risk 1.7, p = 0.036). Magnified images obtained with the ultrasound beam parallel to the membrane identified adverse outcome more accurately than unmagnified and perpendicular images. A cut-off point of >2.2 mm for membrane thickness was found to be the best predictor of good outcome. Conclusions: Membrane thickness can be used to identify chorionicity and adverse perinatal outcome, particularly if the ultrasound images are magnified and parallel to the ultrasound beam.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.