A total of 109 patients submitted to surgery for the correction of urinary stress incontinence (USI) by two different techniques, i.e. anterior colporrhaphy (group I, n = 57) when cystocele grade II/III was present, and Burch procedure (group II, n = 52) when cystocele grade I was present, were reevaluated an average of 5 years after surgery (range: 54–66 months). The curve constructed with the reevaluation data showed a sharp superiority of the Burch technique in terms of correction of USI and associated genital prolapses. There was a progressive recurrence rate that stabilized at 5 years, with values of 78.9% in group I and 40% in group II. Anterior colporrhaphy was ineffective for the correction of any of these parameters in group I. The data clearly show the need to improve the presurgical diagnostic methods for the selection of patients that will benefit from treatment: detailed history of the current disease and auxiliary tests such as Q-tip test, transvaginal ultrasound, and urodynamic study. Other factors were associated with ineffective treatment in both groups, such as hypoestrogenism (20/109), excessive weight gain (19/109) and chronic intestinal constipation and/or coughing present in 36 patients, with recurrence in 28 of them.

Keywords:
Urinary stress incontinence, Surgery for urinary stress incontinence, Anterior colporrhaphy, Retropubic colpourethrocystopexy, Stress incontinence, long-term results
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.