In 429 women with the diagnosis of cancer in situ (CIS), we found, during a follow-up time of 10 years, a relapse frequency of 5.3%; conization was the primary treatment in 414 cases, in 13 cases hysterectomy and radiotherapy in 2 cases. We found that the mean age was significantly higher (p < 0.01) when the primary CIS lesion was localized in the cervix (36.8 ± 10.5) compared to localization only on the portio (31.3 ± 8.7). The risk of relapse was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in patients where the primary cone had the lesion localized in the cervix compared to the patients where the primary cone had the lesion localized only to the portio. We found that the localization of PAD relapses appearing later compared to a high degree (about 65 %) with the localization of the primary CIS lesion. Vaginal relapse was, generally speaking, twice as common when the primary CIS lesion was localized in the cervix compared to when it was localized on the portio alone. Alternative treatment methods to the conization operation are discussed and an increased individualization of CIS treatment is emphasized particularly with consideration to age and the localization of the CIS lesion.

Keywords:
Cancer in situ, Pathological-anatomical diagnosis, Punch excision, Punch biopsy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1982 S. Karger AG, Basel
1982
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.