It has been shown that pathogen-specific secretory IgA (SIgA) antibody (Ab) is the major player at mucosal surfaces for host defense. However, alterations in the mucosal immune system occur in advanced aging, which results in a failure of induction of SIgA Abs for the protection from infectious diseases. Signs of mucosal senescence first appear in the gut immune system. Further, changes in the intestinal microbiota most likely influence mucosal immunity. To overcome the immunological aging decline in mucosal immunity, several adjuvant systems including mucosal dendritic cell targeting have been shown to be attractive and effective immunological strategies. Similarly, microfold (M) cells involved in the antigen (Ag) uptake are ideal targets for facilitating Ag-specific mucosal immune responses. However, the numbers of M cells are reduced in aged mice. In this regard, Spi-B, an essential transcription factor for the functional and structural differentiation of M cells, could be a potent strategy for the induction of effective mucosal immunity in aging.

The mucosal immune system in higher mammals is sophisticated and consists of an integrated network of tissues, lymphoid and mucous membrane-associated cells, and effector antibody (Ab) molecules. Along with cytokines, chemokines, and their receptors, these effector Ab molecules, which are primarily of the IgA isotype, are key players in mucosal immunity and appear to function in synergy with innate host factors [1,2]. Thus, in order to induce antigen (Ag)-specific immune responses at these mucosal barriers, one must consider the common mucosal immune system, which supports the concept of distinct mucosal IgA inductive and effector tissues [1,2]. The mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) serves as the major mucosal inductive site. MALT is covered by a lymphoepithelium containing microfold (M) cells and well-organized regions, the subepithelium with enriched Ag-presenting cells, a B cell zone with germinal centers, and adjacent T cell areas including an equal distribution of naïve and memory T cell phenotypes [1,2]. Upon Ag activation, memory B and T cell populations then emigrate from the mucosal inductive environment via lymphatic drainage, circulate through the bloodstream, and home to mucosal effector sites, where abundant IgA-producing plasma cells are present. The effector sites for mucosal immune responses include the lymphoid cells in the lamina propria of the gastrointestinal (GI), upper respiratory, and reproductive tracts as well as secretory glandular tissues [1,2]. The Ag-specific mucosal effector cells include IgA-producing plasma cells as well as mature B and T lymphocytes. Secretory IgA (SIgA) is the primary Ig involved in protecting mucosal surfaces and is locally produced by plasma cells in mucosal effector tissues [1,2]. In this regard, the majority of T and B cells in effector tissues are activated and express a memory phenotype [1,2]. Thus, it is generally agreed that mucosal immune responses are initiated in mucosal inductive [e.g., gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) and nasopharyngeal- associated lymphoid tissue (NALT)] but not effector tissues.

Despite recent achievements in the understanding of the complexities within the mucosal immune system, only limited information is available in terms of age-associated changes that occur in mucosal immune responses. In this short review, we will mainly focus on GI immune responses in aging in order to shed light on the unique cellular and molecular changes that occur in mucosal immunosenescence.

Immune functions are known to deteriorate with age in several species. In humans, the elderly are at a higher risk for infections, especially severe infections, as well as for certain autoimmune diseases and cancer, and their immune responses to vaccination are diminished [3]. It has been accepted that aged humans exhibit a loss of naïve T cells and a more restricted T cell repertoire [4]. Further, aging results in decreased human CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, restricted B cell clonal diversity, failure to produce high-affinity Abs, and an increase in memory T cells [5,6,7]. It has been suggested that although certain dendritic cell (DC) populations are fully functional in aging [8,9,10,11], both foreign Ags and self-Ags induce enhanced proinflammatory cytokines [12,13]. This enhancement of inflammation can be detrimental; however, very old individuals with a more balanced pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotype may be the most fortunate [14,15]. The association of inflammation in aging has been termed ‘inflamm-aging' [16]; however, we still do not have direct evidence that inflamm-aging occurs in and therefore influences the mucosal immune system.

Studies have provided extensive evidence of a dysregulation of and an overall decline in mucosal immunity especially in the GI tract of the elderly [3]. The most common method for evaluating mucosal immune responses is perhaps to test the external secretions for the presence of SIgA Abs. In humans, GI lavages taken from either aged or young subjects were shown to contain similar total Ig levels [17]. Our group has shown that early development of aging occurs in the GI tract immune system [18]. Fecal extract samples from 1-year-old mice contained low levels of Ag-specific SIgA Abs; however, total IgA levels were essentially the same as those seen in young adult mice [19]. Similar results have also been reported for total IgA levels in the serum of aged mice, rats, and humans [18]. These studies indicate an absence of age-associated impairment in total IgA synthesis in external secretions. However, Ag-specific IgA Ab responses in elderly humans, mice, and rats are markedly lower than those seen in the young. Further, our previous studies showed that the GALT inductive immune system is affected by immunosenescence earlier than the NALT-based and systemic immune systems [19,20]. In addition, it has been suggested that maturation into adulthood, from 8 to 24 weeks of age, significantly influenced the induction of oral tolerance in various strains of mice [21]. However, oral tolerance established at an early age could be maintained even during the aging process, while the induction of oral tolerance to new or virgin Ags was impaired in aged mice. These results clearly show that Ag-specific mucosal SIgA Ab responses and oral tolerance are diminished in aged mice, especially those supported by the GALT immune system.

The mammalian large intestine contains up to 1012 bacteria per gram of intestinal contents [22,23]. Indeed, the human gut microbiota harbors more than 50 genera/several hundred species, which represent more genes in the gut microflora than are seen in the human genome [24]. The normal microbiota is essential to maintain appropriate homeostatic conditions, providing energy in the form of short-chain fatty acids, nutrients, and protection against colonization with potential pathogenic bacteria by the production of antimicrobial peptides [23,25]. In addition to these functions, the intestinal microbiota plays a major role in the maturation of the host immune system including intestinal SIgA Ab production and intraepithelial lymphocyte development [22,26]. For example, germ-free mice have an immature GI mucosal immune system, which includes hypoplastic Peyer's patches (PPs) as well as diminished numbers of IgA-producing cells and CD4+ T cells [22,27]. Cells of germ-free mice exposed to cells of normal mice or monoassociated with E. coli resulted in the maturation of the mucosal immune system [28,29]. Further, it was reported that bacterial stimulation of human intestinal epithelial cells supported IgA2 subclass switching [30]. Conversely, the lack of intestinal IgA Ab responses altered the intestinal microbiota by allowing bacterial population changes to occur. Thus, the aberrant expansion of segmented filamentous bacteria was noted in activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID)-deficient mice, which lack an appropriate molecular environment for IgA class switching [31]. Further, opportunistic bacteria, mostly Alcaligenes species, specifically inhabit GALT or PPs as well as isolated lymphoid follicles with an associated preferential induction of Ag-specific SIgA Abs in the GI tract [32]. The absence of a microflora in the GI tract also affects oral tolerance induction [33]. Thus, one cannot readily induce oral tolerance in germ-free mice [34]. Indeed, human microbiome analyses have revealed significant changes in the intestinal microflora in the elderly (<65 years) [35,36]. However, others have shown that the change in the microbiota was seen only in centenarians with increased inflammatory cytokine responses, but not in the elderly (average age 70 ± 3 years) [37]. Nevertheless, these findings would indirectly suggest that the alterations in the intestinal microflora and the decline in the gut immune system are major changes associated with aging.

Elderly individuals are in general much more susceptible to infections usually acquired via mucosal exposures. The GI tract in the elderly is particularly susceptible to infectious diseases, suggesting that a poor mucosal immunity is a major factor leading to higher mortality from infections in aging [38,39]. Further, Ag-specific mucosal IgA Ab responses are diminished in aged animals, especially those seen in the GI tract-associated immune system [3,18]. Moreover, the severity and mortality caused by influenza virus and the bacterial pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae (the pneumococcus) are sharply increased in humans of advanced age [40,41]. Although it has been shown that an effective protection can be provided by pathogen-specific systemic IgG without mucosal IgA responses [42], pathogen-specific SIgA Ab responses are a necessary component for providing a first line of effective immunity against these respiratory pathogens at their entry site [8,43]. However, it has proven difficult to induce de novo vaccine-specific mucosal immunity in the elderly using current vaccine approaches. Indeed, it has been shown that the tri- and tetravalent live attenuated influenza virus nasal vaccines are ineffective in the elderly (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6332a3.htm and https://www.flumistquadrivalent.com/consumer/index.html). This could be due to the pre-existing influenza-specific Abs including respiratory SIgA in older individuals, which may influence the uptake of the nasal influenza vaccine.

The induction of mucosal immune responses requires the use of either mucosal adjuvants and/or live attenuated microbe delivery systems [1,2]. In addition, the co-administration of adjuvant(s) offers the advantage of eliciting Ag-specific parenteral immune responses [1,2]. In this regard, adjuvant systems have provided significant improvements in the development of influenza vaccines in the elderly [44,45]. Thus, an H5N1 vaccine with the MF59 adjuvant induced a rapid rise in broadly crossreactive Abs as well as long-lived human memory B cells [44]. More recently, the AS03 adjuvant system (squalene, DL-α-tocopherol, and polysorbate 80; GlaxoSmithKline) improved the immune response to inactivated 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine in both healthy adults (18-64 years) and older adults (>65 years) [45]. Despite this advance, a recent study showed that the nasal vaccination of mice with detergent split influenza Ag [A/Uruguay/716/2007 (H3N2)] given with purified monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) in liposomes promoted detrimental Th17-mediated immunity [46]. The vaccine induced both mucosal and plasma-derived Abs; however, the mice lost weight but eventually recovered [46]. These findings illustrate the point that adjuvant selection and the delivery method must be carefully considered in order to develop effective and safe vaccines. Since it has been shown that resident memory T cells play key roles in the protection from influenza virus infection [47], reactivation of these T cell populations may represent an additional approach to induce Ag-specific immunity.

To explore new avenues for effective mucosal immunization strategies, investigators have begun to target mucosal tissues and immune cells for vaccine delivery. To this end, mucosal DC-targeting Ag delivery systems have been shown to induce Ag-specific SIgA responses [48,49,50]. CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) as vaccine adjuvants have been shown to restore Ag-specific immune responses to ovalbumin (OVA), diphtheria toxoid, hepatitis B, pneumococcal polysaccharides, amyloid β, and tumor cells in aged mice and rats [3]. In addition, it has been shown that IL-15 treatment also restored impaired DC functions in mesenteric lymph nodes of aged mice [51]. When normal 3-month-old versus 18-month-old mice were orally immunized with the weak immunogen OVA plus CpG ODN as adjuvant, both groups of mice showed high and equivalent levels of OVA-specific systemic IgG and mucosal SIgA Ab responses [52]. Furthermore, our studies showed that when a combined nasal adjuvant consisting of a plasmid encoding the Flt3 ligand cDNA (pFL) and CpG ODN was given with OVA or with pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) or hemagglutinin (HA) to aged mice, significant levels of Ag-specific SIgA Ab responses were induced in the external secretions with full protection from pneumococcal or influenza virus infection [8,9,48]. Importantly, this double adjuvant system elicited balanced Th1- and Th2-type cytokine responses without increasing potential inflammatory IL-17 responses [8,9,48].

As emphasized thus far, MALT (NALT and GALT) plays an important role in mucosal immunity. In this regard, an Ag sampling system that takes up luminal Ags from the mucosal environment into the tissue is mediated by M cells. M cells have unique morphological features, such as relatively short irregular microvilli on their apical surfaces and a pocket structure that enfolds lymphocytes and Ag-presenting cells including DCs (fig. 1a). These unique features allow M cells to transport luminal Ags from the gut or nasal lumen to underlying MALT lymphocytes more efficiently. Thus, a strategy for targeting these M cells for the induction of mucosal immunity in aging is highly attractive. Reoviruses use their own protein sigma one (pσ1) to initiate infection through M cells [53,54]. In this regard, M cell-targeting DNA vaccine complexes consisting of plasmid DNA and the covalently attached reovirus pσ1 to poly-L-lysine (PL) induced significant mucosal SIgA Ab responses in addition to systemic immunity [54]. Further, a novel M cell-specific monoclonal Ab (NKM 16-2-4) has been used as a carrier for M cell targeting with a mucosal vaccine to elicit protective immunity against lethal challenge with botulinum neurotoxin [55]. Oral immunization of Ag fused with M cell-targeting peptide ligand (Co1) resulted in enhanced Ag-specific immune responses [56]. Although there is little information about the molecular mechanisms for Ag sampling in M cells due to the difficulty in their in vitro culture, it has been reported that glycoprotein 2 (GP2) is specifically expressed on M cells and acts as a binding receptor for FimH-expressing bacteria (e.g., E. coli and Salmonella spp.) to induce effective uptake of and specific immune responses to such bacteria [57,58]. Interestingly, it has also been reported that the Salmonella enterica, serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) type III effector protein SopB induces a transition of follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) enterocytes into M cells [59].

Fig. 1

Unique features of M cells and their differentiation. a M cells exhibit short and sparse villi when compared with other surrounding FAE cells. Dogma suggests that this feature contributes to an easy access to the M cells for numerous external materials including commensal bacteria. In addition, the shape of M cells looks like ‘arms' that are able to ‘hold' lymphocytes and Ag-presenting cells. b Like other intestinal epithelial cells, M cells develop from intestinal epithelial stem cells (IESC). Enterocytes located in the FAE possibly receive RANKL stimulation from subepithelial stromal cells of PPs via RANK, which is expressed on most intestinal epithelial cells. This stimulation triggers the induction of Spi-B, which is an essential transcription factor for mature M cells. The target genes of Spi-B contribute to the final development and functional expression of M cells. For example, GP2, which is one of the Spi-B targets in M cells, acts as a scaffold receptor for FimH protein of E. coli and Salmonella spp.

Fig. 1

Unique features of M cells and their differentiation. a M cells exhibit short and sparse villi when compared with other surrounding FAE cells. Dogma suggests that this feature contributes to an easy access to the M cells for numerous external materials including commensal bacteria. In addition, the shape of M cells looks like ‘arms' that are able to ‘hold' lymphocytes and Ag-presenting cells. b Like other intestinal epithelial cells, M cells develop from intestinal epithelial stem cells (IESC). Enterocytes located in the FAE possibly receive RANKL stimulation from subepithelial stromal cells of PPs via RANK, which is expressed on most intestinal epithelial cells. This stimulation triggers the induction of Spi-B, which is an essential transcription factor for mature M cells. The target genes of Spi-B contribute to the final development and functional expression of M cells. For example, GP2, which is one of the Spi-B targets in M cells, acts as a scaffold receptor for FimH protein of E. coli and Salmonella spp.

Close modal

Recently, it has been reported that one of the E26 avian leukemia oncogene transformation-specific (Ets) family transcription factors, Spi-B, is essential for the functional and structural differentiation of M cells [60,61,62]. Like all other intestinal epithelial cell lineages, M cells develop from leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5-positive (Lgr5+) intestinal epithelial stem cells [62]. Some M cell precursor cells receive receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) stimulation from the subepithelial stromal cells in the FAE region. This signal triggers the expression and activation of Spi-B and subsequently the upregulation of several Spi-B-target genes including GP2, which is considered to be a matured M cell marker (fig. 1b). Of importance, it has been shown that GP2+ mature GALT M cells are significantly decreased in aged mice [63]. Although the expression of RANKL and RANK and their signaling are not altered in aged mice, Spi-B-positive cells are significantly diminished in their FAE region through an unknown mechanism [63]. In agreement with the reduction in mature M cells, the uptake of latex particles into the PPs is severely impaired in aged mice. Furthermore, in the absence of M cell-intrinsic Spi-B, the activation of T cells toward orally inoculated S. Typhimurium enterica is severely diminished [61]. Therefore, a reduced M cell number may be one of the causes of immunosenescence in the elderly. Although M cells are also found in NALT FAE, there is no report describing a change in the density of mature M cells in NALT FAE with aging so far. Therefore, it is possible that one of the reasons for the delay in immunosenescence in NALT is the maintenance of high numbers of mature functional M cells on NALT FAE of aged mice. From the view of vaccine development, forced Spi-B activation and/or expression may be a good target for an oral vaccine adjuvant used in the elderly.

In conclusion, there is significant evidence showing that the GI tract immune system is altered by advanced aging; however, the precise cellular and molecular mechanisms that lead to mucosal immunosenescence remain to be elucidated, especially in humans. A clear understanding of the mucosal immune system in aging could lead to the development of new strategies for vaccines specifically tailored for the elderly.

This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant No. AG025873 (to K.F.) as well as the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) 25860353 to S.S.]; research funding for Longevity Sciences (26-22) of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan (to S.S.); and the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology Program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (to H.K.).

1.
Fujihashi K, Boyaka PN, McGhee JR: Host defenses at mucosal surfaces; in Rich RT, Fleisher TA, Shearer WT, Schroeder HW Jr, Frew AJ, Weyand CM (eds): Clinical Immunology Principles and Practice, ed 4. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders, 2013, pp 239-251.
2.
Kiyono H, Kunisawa J, McGhee JR, Mestecky J: The mucosal immune system; in Paul WE (ed): Fundamental Immunology. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008, pp 983-1030.
3.
Fujihashi K, Kiyono H: Mucosal immunosenescence: new developments and vaccines to control infectious diseases. Trends Immunol 2009;30:334-343.
4.
Appay V, Sauce D: Naive T cells: the crux of cellular immune aging? Exp Gerontol 2014;54:90-93.
5.
McElhaney JE, Meneilly GS, Beattie BL, Helgason CD, Lee SF, Devine RD, Bleackley RC: The effect of influenza vaccination on IL2 production in healthy elderly: implications for current vaccination practices. J Gerontol 1992;47:M3-M8.
6.
Powers DC, Belshe RB: Effect of age on cytotoxic T lymphocyte memory as well as serum and local antibody responses elicited by inactivated influenza virus vaccine. J Infect Dis 1993;167:584-592.
7.
Saltzman RL, Peterson PK: Immunodeficiency of the elderly. Rev Infect Dis 1987;9:1127-1139.
8.
Asanuma H, Zamri NB, Sekine S, Fukuyama Y, Tokuhara D, Gilbert RS, Fukuiwa T, Fujihashi K, Sata T, Tashiro M, Fujihashi K: A novel combined adjuvant for nasal delivery elicits mucosal immunity to influenza in aging. Vaccine 2012;30:803-812.
9.
Fukuyama Y, King JD, Kataoka K, Kobayashi R, Gilbert RS, Hollingshead SK, Briles DE, Fujihashi K: A combination of Flt3 ligand cDNA and CpG oligodeoxynucleotide as nasal adjuvant elicits protective secretory-IgA immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae in aged mice. J Immunol 2011;186:2454-2461.
10.
Pietschmann P, Hahn P, Kudlacek S, Thomas R, Peterlik M: Surface markers and transendothelial migration of dendritic cells from elderly subjects. Exp Gerontol 2000;35:213-224.
11.
Tesar BM, Walker WE, Unternaehrer J, Joshi NS, Chandele A, Haynes L, Kaech S, Goldstein DR: Murine myeloid dendritic cell-dependent toll-like receptor immunity is preserved with aging. Aging Cell 2006;5:473-486.
12.
Agrawal A, Agrawal S, Cao JN, Su H, Osann K, Gupta S: Altered innate immune functioning of dendritic cells in elderly humans: a role of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-signaling pathway. J Immunol 2007;178:6912-6922.
13.
Agrawal A, Tay J, Ton S, Agrawal S, Gupta S: Increased reactivity of dendritic cells from aged subjects to self-antigen, the human DNA. J Immunol 2009;182:1138-1145.
14.
Franceschi C, Capri M, Monti D, Giunta S, Olivieri F, Sevini F, Panourgia MP, Invidia L, Celani L, Scurti M, Cevenini E, Castellani GC, Salvioli S: Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mech Ageing Dev 2007;128:92-105.
15.
Van Bodegom D, May L, Meij HJ, Westendorp RG: Regulation of human life histories: the role of the inflammatory host response. Ann NY Acad Sci 2007;1100:84-97.
16.
Franceschi C, Bonafe M, Valensin S, Olivieri F, De Luca M, Ottaviani E, De Benedictis G: Inflamm-aging. An evolutionary perspective on immunosenescence. Ann NY Acad Sci 2000;908:244-254.
17.
Arranz E, O'Mahony S, Barton JR, Ferguson A: Immunosenescence and mucosal immunity: significant effects of old age on secretory IgA concentrations and intraepithelial lymphocyte counts. Gut 1992;33:882-886.
18.
Fujihashi K, McGhee JR: Mucosal immunity and tolerance in the elderly. Mech Ageing Dev 2004;125:889-898.
19.
Koga T, McGhee JR, Kato H, Kato R, Kiyono H, Fujihashi K: Evidence for early aging in the mucosal immune system. J Immunol 2000;165:5352-5359.
20.
Hagiwara Y, McGhee JR, Fujihashi K, Kobayashi R, Yoshino N, Kataoka K, Etani Y, Kweon MN, Tamura S, Kurata T, Takeda Y, Kiyono H, Fujihashi K: Protective mucosal immunity in aging is associated with functional CD4+ T cells in nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoreticular tissue. J Immunol 2003;170:1754-1762.
21.
de Faria AM, Garcia G, Rios MJ, Michalaros CL, Vaz NM: Decrease in susceptibility to oral tolerance induction and occurrence of oral immunization to ovalbumin in 20-38-week-old mice. The effect of interval between oral exposures and rate of antigen intake in the oral immunization. Immunology 1993;78:147-151.
22.
Macpherson AJ, McCoy KD, Johansen FE, Brandtzaeg P: The immune geography of IgA induction and function. Mucosal Immunol 2008;1:11-22.
23.
Tsuji M, Suzuki K, Kinoshita K, Fagarasan S: Dynamic interactions between bacteria and immune cells leading to intestinal IgA synthesis. Semin Immunol 2008;20:59-66.
24.
Kurokawa K, Itoh T, Kuwahara T, Oshima K, Toh H, Toyoda A, Takami H, Morita H, Sharma VK, Srivastava TP, Taylor TD, Noguchi H, Mori H, Ogura Y, Ehrlich DS, Itoh K, Takagi T, Sakaki Y, Hayashi T, Hattori M: Comparative metagenomics revealed commonly enriched gene sets in human gut microbiomes. DNA Res 2007;14:169-181.
25.
Tremaroli V, Backhed F: Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 2012;489:242-249.
26.
Suzuki K, Fagarasan S: How host-bacterial interactions lead to IgA synthesis in the gut. Trends Immunol 2008;29:523-531.
27.
Macpherson AJ, Harris NL: Interactions between commensal intestinal bacteria and the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 2004;4:478-485.
28.
Klaasen HL, Koopman JP, Van den Brink ME, Van Wezel HP, Beynen AC: Mono-association of mice with non-cultivable, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria. Arch Microbiol 1991;156:148-151.
29.
Shroff KE, Meslin K, Cebra JJ: Commensal enteric bacteria engender a self-limiting humoral mucosal immune response while permanently colonizing the gut. Infect Immun 1995;63:3904-3913.
30.
He B, Xu W, Santini PA, Polydorides AD, Chiu A, Estrella J, Shan M, Chadburn A, Villanacci V, Plebani A, Knowles DM, Rescigno M, Cerutti A: Intestinal bacteria trigger T cell-independent immunoglobulin A(2) class switching by inducing epithelial-cell secretion of the cytokine APRIL. Immunity 2007;26:812-826.
31.
Suzuki K, Meek B, Doi Y, Muramatsu M, Chiba T, Honjo T, Fagarasan S: Aberrant expansion of segmented filamentous bacteria in IgA-deficient gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:1981-1986.
32.
Obata T, Goto Y, Kunisawa J, Sato S, Sakamoto M, Setoyama H, Matsuki T, Nonaka K, Shibata N, Gohda M, Kagiyama Y, Nochi T, Yuki Y, Fukuyama Y, Mukai A, Shinzaki S, Fujihashi K, Sasakawa C, Iijima H, Goto M, Umesaki Y, Benno Y, Kiyono H: Indigenous opportunistic bacteria inhabit mammalian gut-associated lymphoid tissues and share a mucosal antibody-mediated symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:7419-7424.
33.
Moreau MC, Gaboriau-Routhiau V: The absence of gut flora, the doses of antigen ingested and aging affect the long-term peripheral tolerance induced by ovalbumin feeding in mice. Res Immunol 1996;147:49-59.
34.
Wannemuehler MJ, Kiyono H, Babb JL, Michalek SM, McGhee JR: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) regulation of the immune response: LPS converts germfree mice to sensitivity to oral tolerance induction. J Immunol 1982;129:959-965.
35.
Claesson MJ, Cusack S, O'Sullivan O, Greene-Diniz R, de Weerd H, Flannery E, Marchesi JR, Falush D, Dinan T, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C, van Sinderen D, O'Connor M, Harnedy N, O'Connor K, Henry C, O'Mahony D, Fitzgerald AP, Shanahan F, Twomey C, Hill C, Ross RP, O'Toole PW: Composition, variability, and temporal stability of the intestinal microbiota of the elderly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108(suppl 1):4586-4591.
36.
Woodmansey EJ: Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J Appl Microbiol 2007;102:1178-1186.
37.
Biagi E, Nylund L, Candela M, Ostan R, Bucci L, Pini E, Nikkila J, Monti D, Satokari R, Franceschi C, Brigidi P, De Vos W: Through ageing, and beyond: gut microbiota and inflammatory status in seniors and centenarians. PLoS One 2010;5:e10667.
38.
Powers DC: Immunological principles and emerging strategies of vaccination for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:81-94.
39.
Schmucker DL, Heyworth MF, Owen RL, Daniels CK: Impact of aging on gastrointestinal mucosal immunity. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:1183-1193.
40.
Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Bridges CB, Cox NJ, Fukuda K: Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA 2004;292:1333-1340.
41.
Webster RG: Immunity to influenza in the elderly. Vaccine 2000;18:1686-1689.
42.
Harriman GR, Bogue M, Rogers P, Finegold M, Pacheco S, Bradley A, Zhang Y, Mbawuike IN: Targeted deletion of the IgA constant region in mice leads to IgA deficiency with alterations in expression of other Ig isotypes. J Immunol 1999;162:2521-2529.
43.
Fukuyama Y, King JD, Kataoka K, Kobayashi R, Gilbert RS, Oishi K, Hollingshead SK, Briles DE, Fujihashi K: Secretory-IgA antibodies play an important role in the immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Immunol 2010;185:1755-1762.
44.
Galli G, Hancock K, Hoschler K, DeVos J, Praus M, Bardelli M, Malzone C, Castellino F, Gentile C, McNally T, Del Giudice G, Banzhoff A, Brauer V, Montomoli E, Zambon M, Katz J, Nicholson K, Stephenson I: Fast rise of broadly cross-reactive antibodies after boosting long-lived human memory B cells primed by an MF59 adjuvanted prepandemic vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:7962-7967.
45.
Jackson LA, Chen WH, Stapleton JT, Dekker CL, Wald A, Brady RC, Edupuganti S, Winokur P, Mulligan MJ, Keyserling HL, Kotloff KL, Rouphael N, Noah DL, Hill H, Wolff MC: Immunogenicity and safety of varying dosages of a monovalent 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine given with and without AS03 adjuvant system in healthy adults and older persons. J Infect Dis 2012;206:811-820.
46.
Maroof A, Yorgensen YM, Li Y, Evans JT: Intranasal vaccination promotes detrimental Th17-mediated immunity against influenza infection. PLoS Pathog 2014;10:e1003875.
47.
Teijaro JR, Turner D, Pham Q, Wherry EJ, Lefrancois L, Farber DL: Cutting edge: tissue-retentive lung memory CD4 T cells mediate optimal protection to respiratory virus infection. J Immunol 2011;187:5510-5514.
48.
Fukuiwa T, Sekine S, Kobayashi R, Suzuki H, Kataoka K, Gilbert RS, Kurono Y, Boyaka PN, Krieg AM, McGhee JR, Fujihashi K: A combination of Flt3 ligand cDNA and CpG ODN as nasal adjuvant elicits NALT dendritic cells for prolonged mucosal immunity. Vaccine 2008;26:4849-4859.
49.
Kataoka K, McGhee JR, Kobayashi R, Fujihashi K, Shizukuishi S, Fujihashi K: Nasal Flt3 ligand cDNA elicits CD11c+ CD8+ dendritic cells for enhanced mucosal immunity. J Immunol 2004;172:3612-3619.
50.
Sekine S, Kataoka K, Fukuyama Y, Adachi Y, Davydova J, Yamamoto M, Kobayashi R, Fujihashi K, Suzuki H, Curiel DT, Shizukuishi S, McGhee JR, Fujihashi K: A novel adenovirus expressing Flt3 ligand enhances mucosal immunity by inducing mature nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoreticular tissue dendritic cell migration. J Immunol 2008;180:8126-8134.
51.
Moretto MM, Lawlor EM, Khan IA: Aging mice exhibit a functional defect in mucosal dendritic cell response against an intracellular pathogen. J Immunol 2008;181:7977-7984.
52.
Alignani D, Maletto B, Liscovsky M, Ropolo A, Moron G, Pistoresi-Palencia MC: Orally administered OVA/CpG-ODN induces specific mucosal and systemic immune response in young and aged mice. J Leukoc Biol 2005;77:898-905.
53.
Nibert ML, Furlong DB, Fields BN: Mechanisms of viral pathogenesis. Distinct forms of reoviruses and their roles during replication in cells and host. J Clin Invest 1991;88:727-734.
54.
Wu Y, Wang X, Csencsits KL, Haddad A, Walters N, Pascual DW: M cell-targeted DNA vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:9318-9323.
55.
Nochi T, Yuki Y, Matsumura A, Mejima M, Terahara K, Kim DY, Fukuyama S, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Kawaoka Y, Kohda T, Kozaki S, Igarashi O, Kiyono H: A novel M cell-specific carbohydrate-targeted mucosal vaccine effectively induces antigen-specific immune responses. J Exp Med 2007;204:2789-2796.
56.
Kim SH, Seo KW, Kim J, Lee KY, Jang YS: The M cell-targeting ligand promotes antigen delivery and induces antigen-specific immune responses in mucosal vaccination. J Immunol 2010;185:5787-5795.
57.
Terahara K, Yoshida M, Igarashi O, Nochi T, Pontes GS, Hase K, Ohno H, Kurokawa S, Mejima M, Takayama N, Yuki Y, Lowe AW, Kiyono H: Comprehensive gene expression profiling of Peyer's patch M cells, villous M-like cells, and intestinal epithelial cells. J Immunol 2008;180:7840-7846.
58.
Hase K, Kawano K, Nochi T, Pontes GS, Fukuda S, Ebisawa M, Kadokura K, Tobe T, Fujimura Y, Kawano S, Yabashi A, Waguri S, Nakato G, Kimura S, Murakami T, Iimura M, Hamura K, Fukuoka S, Lowe AW, Itoh K, Kiyono H, Ohno H: Uptake through glycoprotein 2 of FimH(+) bacteria by M cells initiates mucosal immune response. Nature 2009;462:226-230.
59.
Tahoun A, Mahajan S, Paxton E, Malterer G, Donaldson DS, Wang D, Tan A, Gillespie TL, O'Shea M, Roe AJ, Shaw DJ, Gally DL, Lengeling A, Mabbott NA, Haas J, Mahajan A: Salmonella transforms follicle-associated epithelial cells into M cells to promote intestinal invasion. Cell Host Microbe 2012;12:645-656.
60.
Sato S, Kaneto S, Shibata N, Takahashi Y, Okura H, Yuki Y, Kunisawa J, Kiyono H: Transcription factor Spi-B-dependent and -independent pathways for the development of Peyer's patch M cells. Mucosal Immunol 2013;6:838-846.
61.
Kanaya T, Hase K, Takahashi D, Fukuda S, Hoshino K, Sasaki I, Hemmi H, Knoop KA, Kumar N, Sato M, Katsuno T, Yokosuka O, Toyooka K, Nakai K, Sakamoto A, Kitahara Y, Jinnohara T, McSorley SJ, Kaisho T, Williams IR, Ohno H: The Ets transcription factor Spi-B is essential for the differentiation of intestinal microfold cells. Nat Immunol 2012;13:729-736.
62.
de Lau W, Kujala P, Schneeberger K, Middendorp S, Li VS, Barker N, Martens A, Hofhuis F, DeKoter RP, Peters PJ, Nieuwenhuis E, Clevers H: Peyer's patch M cells derived from Lgr5(+) stem cells require SpiB and are induced by RankL in cultured ‘miniguts'. Mol Cell Biol 2012;32:3639-3647.
63.
Kobayashi A, Donaldson DS, Erridge C, Kanaya T, Williams IR, Ohno H, Mahajan A, Mabbott NA: The functional maturation of M cells is dramatically reduced in the Peyer's patches of aged mice. Mucosal Immunol 2013;6:1027-1037.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.