Background: With the rapidly increasing population of elderly people, dental extraction in elderly individuals with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has become quite common. The issue of how to assure the safety of elderly patients with CVDs undergoing dental extraction has perplexed dentists and internists for many years. And it is important to derive an appropriate risk prediction tool for this population. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to establish and validate a prediction model based on the random forest (RF) algorithm for the risk of cardiac complications of dental extraction in elderly patients with CVDs. Methods: Between August 2017 and May 2018, a total of 603 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were used to create a training set. An independent test set contained 230 patients between June 2018 and July 2018. Data regarding clinical parameters, laboratory tests, clinical examinations before dental extraction, and 1-week follow-up were retrieved. Predictors were identified by using logistic regression (LR) with penalized LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) variable selection. Then, a prediction model was constructed based on the RF algorithm by using a 5-fold cross-validation method. Results: The training set, based on 603 participants, including 282 men and 321 women, had an average participant age of 72.38 ± 8.31 years. Using feature selection methods, 11 predictors for risk of cardiac complications were screened out. When the RF model was constructed, its overall classification accuracy was 0.82 at the optimal cutoff value of 18.5%. In comparison to the LR model, the RF model showed a superior predictive performance. The AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) scores of the RF and LR models were 0.83 and 0.80, respectively, in the independent test set. The AUPRC (area under the precision-recall curve) scores of the RF and LR models were 0.56 and 0.35, respectively, in the independent test set. Conclusion: The RF-based prediction model is expected to be applicable for preoperative clinical assessment for preventing cardiac complications in elderly patients with CVDs undergoing dental extraction. The findings may aid physicians and dentists in making more informed recommendations to prevent cardiac complications in this patient population.

1.
Reiner
Z
.
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with statins in the elderly
.
Curr Atheroscler Rep
.
2014
Jul
;
16
(
7
):
420
.
[PubMed]
1523-3804
2.
Liau
FL
,
Kok
SH
,
Lee
JJ
,
Kuo
RC
,
Hwang
CR
,
Yang
PJ
, et al.
Cardiovascular influence of dental anxiety during local anesthesia for tooth extraction
.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
.
2008
Jan
;
105
(
1
):
16
26
.
[PubMed]
1079-2104
3.
Neves
RS
,
Neves
IL
,
Giorgi
DM
,
Grupi
CJ
,
César
LA
,
Hueb
W
, et al.
Effects of epinephrine in local dental anesthesia in patients with coronary artery disease
.
Arq Bras Cardiol
.
2007
May
;
88
(
5
):
545
51
.
[PubMed]
0066-782X
4.
Ogunlewe
MO
,
James
O
,
Ajuluchukwu
JN
,
Ladeinde
AL
,
Adeyemo
WL
,
Gbotolorun
OM
.
Evaluation of haemodynamic changes in hypertensive patients during tooth extraction under local anaesthesia
.
West Indian Med J
.
2011
Jan
;
60
(
1
):
91
5
.
[PubMed]
0043-3144
5.
Abellan van Kan
G
,
Rolland
Y
,
Houles
M
,
Gillette-Guyonnet
S
,
Soto
M
,
Vellas
B
.
The assessment of frailty in older adults
.
Clin Geriatr Med
.
2010
May
;
26
(
2
):
275
86
.
[PubMed]
0749-0690
6.
Abu-Mostafa
N
,
Aldawssary
A
,
Assari
A
,
Alnujaidy
S
,
Almutlaq
A
.
A prospective randomized clinical trial compared the effect of various types of local anesthetics cartridges on hypertensive patients during dental extraction
.
J Clin Exp Dent
.
2015
Feb
;
7
(
1
):
e84
8
.
[PubMed]
1989-5488
7.
Kapwata
T
,
Gebreslasie
MT
.
Random forest variable selection in spatial malaria transmission modelling in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa
.
Geospat Health
.
2016
Nov
;
11
(
3
):
434
.
[PubMed]
1827-1987
8.
Machado
G
,
Mendoza
MR
,
Corbellini
LG
.
What variables are important in predicting bovine viral diarrhea virus? A random forest approach
.
Vet Res (Faisalabad)
.
2015
Jul
;
46
(
1
):
85
.
[PubMed]
1993-5412
9.
Breiman
L
.
Classification and regression trees
.
Belmont (Calif.)
:
Wadsworth International Group
;
1984
.
10.
Shotton
J
,
Fitzgibbon
A
,
Cook
M
,
Sharp
T
,
Finocchio
M
,
Moore
R
, et al.
Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images
.
CVPR
.
2011
;
2011
:
1297
304
.
11.
Fanelli
G
,
Dantone
M
,
Gall
J
,
Fossati
A
,
Van Gool
L
.
Random Forests for Real Time 3D Face Analysis
.
Int J Comput Vis
.
2013
;
101
(
3
):
437
58
. 0920-5691
12.
Polan
DF
,
Brady
SL
,
Kaufman
RA
.
Tissue segmentation of computed tomography images using a Random Forest algorithm: a feasibility study
.
Phys Med Biol
.
2016
Sep
;
61
(
17
):
6553
69
.
[PubMed]
0031-9155
13.
Walsh
ES
,
Kreakie
BJ
,
Cantwell
MG
,
Nacci
D
.
A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system
.
PLoS One
.
2017
Jul
;
12
(
7
):
e0179473
.
[PubMed]
1932-6203
14.
Dasgupta
A
,
Sun
YV
,
König
IR
,
Bailey-Wilson
JE
,
Malley
JD
.
Brief review of regression-based and machine learning methods in genetic epidemiology: the Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 experience
.
Genet Epidemiol
.
2011
;
35
(
S1
Suppl 1
):
S5
11
.
[PubMed]
0741-0395
15.
Naderi
S
,
Yin
T
,
König
S
.
Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups
.
J Dairy Sci
.
2016
Sep
;
99
(
9
):
7261
73
.
[PubMed]
0022-0302
16.
Wang
H
,
Zhou
L
.
Random survival forest with space extensions for censored data
.
Artif Intell Med
.
2017
Jun
;
79
:
52
61
.
[PubMed]
0933-3657
17.
Nasejje
JB
,
Mwambi
H
,
Dheda
K
,
Lesosky
M
.
A comparison of the conditional inference survival forest model to random survival forests based on a simulation study as well as on two applications with time-to-event data
.
BMC Med Res Methodol
.
2017
Jul
;
17
(
1
):
115
.
[PubMed]
1471-2288
18.
Ishwaran
H
,
Blackstone
EH
,
Pothier
CE
,
Lauer
MS
.
Relative Risk Forests for Exercise Heart Rate Recovery as a Predictor of Mortality
.
J Am Stat Assoc
.
2004
;
99
(
467
):
591
600
. 0162-1459
19.
Ishwaran
H
,
Kogalur
UB
,
Blackstone
EH
,
Lauer
MS
.
Random survival forests
.
Ann Appl Stat
.
2008
;
2
(
3
):
841
60
. 1932-6157
20.
Tsuji
S
,
Midorikawa
Y
,
Takahashi
T
,
Yagi
K
,
Takayama
T
,
Yoshida
K
, et al.
Potential responders to FOLFOX therapy for colorectal cancer by Random Forests analysis
.
Br J Cancer
.
2012
Jan
;
106
(
1
):
126
32
.
[PubMed]
0007-0920
21.
Breiman
L
.
Random Forests
.
Mach Learn
.
2001
;
45
(
1
):
5
32
. 0885-6125
22.
Cutler
DR
,
Edwards
TC
 Jr
,
Beard
KH
,
Cutler
A
,
Hess
KT
,
Gibson
J
, et al.
Random forests for classification in ecology
.
Ecology
.
2007
Nov
;
88
(
11
):
2783
92
.
[PubMed]
0012-9658
23.
Roger
VL
,
Go
AS
,
Lloyd-Jones
DM
,
Adams
RJ
,
Berry
JD
,
Brown
TM
, et al.;
American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee
.
Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association
.
Circulation
.
2011
Feb
;
123
(
4
):
e18
209
.
[PubMed]
0009-7322
24.
Kalezic
N
,
Stojanovic
M
,
Milicic
B
,
Antonijevic
V
,
Sabljak
V
,
Markovic
D
, et al.
The incidence of intraoperative hypertension and risk factors for its development during thyroid surgery
.
Clin Exp Hypertens
.
2013
;
35
(
7
):
523
7
.
[PubMed]
1064-1963
25.
Tibshirani
R
.
Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso
.
J R Stat Soc B
.
1996
;
58
(
1
):
267
88
. 0035-9246
26.
Simon
GE
,
Johnson
E
,
Lawrence
JM
,
Rossom
RC
,
Ahmedani
B
,
Lynch
FL
, et al.
Predicting Suicide Attempts and Suicide Deaths Following Outpatient Visits Using Electronic Health Records
.
Am J Psychiatry
.
2018
Oct
;
175
(
10
):
951
60
.
[PubMed]
0002-953X
27.
Hastie
T
,
Tibshirani
R
,
Friedman
J
.
Unsupervised Learning; The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
.
New York (NY)
:
Springer New York
;
2009
. pp.
485
585
.
28.
Mani
S
,
Chen
Y
,
Elasy
T
,
Clayton
W
,
Denny
J
.
Type 2 diabetes risk forecasting from EMR data using machine learning
.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc
.
2012
;
2012
:
606
15
.
[PubMed]
1942-597X
29.
Chen
Y
,
Cao
W
,
Gao
X
,
Ong
H
,
Ji
T
.
Predicting postoperative complications of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients using random forest algorithm model
.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
.
2015
Jun
;
15
(
1
):
44
.
[PubMed]
1472-6947
30.
Titapiccolo
JI
,
Ferrario
M
,
Barbieri
C
,
Marcelli
D
,
Mari
F
,
Gatti
E
, et al.
Predictive modeling of cardiovascular complications in incident hemodialysis patients.
2012 Annual International Conference of the Ieee Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Embc)
.
2012
:
3943
-
3946
.
31.
Casanova
R
,
Saldana
S
,
Simpson
SL
,
Lacy
ME
,
Subauste
AR
,
Blackshear
C
, et al.
Prediction of Incident Diabetes in the Jackson Heart Study Using High-Dimensional Machine Learning
.
PLoS One
.
2016
Oct
;
11
(
10
):
e0163942
.
[PubMed]
1932-6203
32.
Wax
DB
,
Porter
SB
,
Lin
HM
,
Hossain
S
,
Reich
DL
.
Association of preanesthesia hypertension with adverse outcomes
.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
.
2010
Dec
;
24
(
6
):
927
30
.
[PubMed]
1053-0770
33.
Matsumura
K
,
Miura
K
,
Takata
Y
,
Kurokawa
H
,
Kajiyama
M
,
Abe
I
, et al.
Changes in blood pressure and heart rate variability during dental surgery
.
Am J Hypertens
.
1998
Nov
;
11
(
11 Pt 1
):
1376
80
.
[PubMed]
0895-7061
34.
Lee
TH
,
Marcantonio
ER
,
Mangione
CM
,
Thomas
EJ
,
Polanczyk
CA
,
Cook
EF
, et al.
Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery
.
Circulation
.
1999
Sep
;
100
(
10
):
1043
9
.
[PubMed]
0009-7322
35.
Olmos-Carrasco
O
,
Pastor-Ramos
V
,
Espinilla-Blanco
R
,
Ortiz-Zarate
A
,
Garcia-Avila
I
,
Rodriguez-Alonso
E
,
Herrero-Sanjuan
R
,
Ruiz-Garcia
MM
,
Gallego-Beuter
P
,
Sanchez-Delgado
MP
,
Teran-Agustin
AI
,
Fernandez-Behar
M
,
Pena-Sainz
I
:
Hemorrhagic complications of dental extractions in 181 patients undergoing double antiplatelet therapy.
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2015
;73:203-210.
36.
Tsuchihashi
T
,
Takata
Y
,
Kurokawa
H
,
Miura
K
,
Maruoka
Y
,
Kajiyama
M
, et al.
Blood pressure response during dental surgery
.
Hypertens Res
.
1996
Sep
;
19
(
3
):
189
94
.
[PubMed]
0916-9636
37.
Moreno-Drada
JA
,
García-Perdomo
HA
.
Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Preventing the Spread of Infection as a Result of Oral Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
.
2016
Jul
;
74
(
7
):
1313
21
.
[PubMed]
0278-2391
38.
Daly
CG
.
Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures
.
Aust Prescr
.
2017
Oct
;
40
(
5
):
184
8
.
[PubMed]
0312-8008
39.
Heinisch
RH
,
Barbieri
CF
,
Nunes Filho
JR
,
Oliveira
GL
,
Heinisch
LM
.
Prospective assessment of different indices of cardiac risk for patients undergoing noncardiac surgeries
.
Arq Bras Cardiol
.
2002
Oct
;
79
(
4
):
327
38
.
[PubMed]
0066-782X
40.
Andersson
C
,
Wissenberg
M
,
Jørgensen
ME
,
Hlatky
MA
,
Mérie
C
,
Jensen
PF
, et al.
Age-specific performance of the revised cardiac risk index for predicting cardiovascular risk in elective noncardiac surgery
.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
.
2015
Jan
;
8
(
1
):
103
8
.
[PubMed]
1941-7713
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.