Background: With global aging, robots are considered a promising solution for handling the shortage of aged care and companionships. However, these technologies would serve little purpose if their intended users do not accept them. While the socioemotional selectivity theory predicts that older adults would accept robots that offer emotionally meaningful relationships, selective optimization with compensation model predicts that older adults would accept robots that compensate for their functional losses. Objective: The present study aims to understand older adults’ expectations for robots and to compare older adults’ acceptance ratings for 2 existing robots: one of them is a more human-like and more service-oriented robot and the other one is a more animal-like and more companion-oriented robot. Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted with 33 healthy, community-dwelling Taiwanese older adults (age range: 59–82 years). Participants first completed a semi-structured interview regarding their ideal robot. After receiving information about the 2 existing robots, they then completed the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology questionnaires to report their pre-implementation acceptance of the 2 robots. Results: Interviews were transcribed for conventional content analysis with satisfactory inter-rater reliability. From the interview data, a collection of older adults’ ideal robot characteristics emerged with highlights of humanlike qualities. From the questionnaire data, respondents showed a higher level of acceptance toward the more service-oriented robot than the more companion-oriented robot in terms of attitude, perceived adaptiveness, and perceived usefulness. From the mixed methods analyses, the finding that older adults had a higher level of positive attitude towards the more service-oriented robot than the more companion-oriented robot was predicted by higher expectation or preference for robots with more service-related functions. Conclusion: This study identified older adults’ preference toward more functional and humanlike robots. Our findings provide practical suggestions for future robot designs that target the older population.

1.
Cheng
ST
,
Chi
I
,
Fung
HH
,
Li
LW
,
Woo
J
.
Successful aging: Asian perspectives
.
Springer
;
2015
.
2.
Baltus
G
,
Fox
D
,
Gemperle
F
,
Goetz
J
,
Hirsch
T
,
Magaritis
D
, et al.
:
Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly
3.
Smarr
C-A
,
Fausset
CB
, &
Rogers
WA
:
Understanding the potential for robot assistance for older adults in the home environment.
2011
. DOI:
4.
Mann
JA
,
Macdonald
BA
,
Kuo
IH
,
Li
X
,
Broadbent
E
.
People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions
.
Comput Human Behav
.
2015
;
43
:
112
7
. 0747-5632
5.
Chuang
JL
,
Sung
HC
.
The effectiveness of Paro robot therapy on mood of older adults: A systematic review
; in :
Abstracts of the Joanna Briggs Institute 2013 International Convention
.
2013
, pp
216
217
.
6.
McGlynn
SA
,
Kemple
S
,
Mitzner
TL
,
King
CA
,
Rogers
WA
.
Understanding the potential of PARO for healthy older adults
.
Int J Hum Comput Stud
.
2017
Apr
;
100
:
33
47
.
[PubMed]
1071-5819
7.
Chan
MY
,
Haber
S
,
Drew
LM
,
Park
DC
.
Training older adults to use tablet computers: does it enhance cognitive function?
Gerontologist
.
2016
Jun
;
56
(
3
):
475
84
.
[PubMed]
0016-9013
8.
Edine
N
.
The 6 robots that will wash and feed us when we’re old.
Huffpost
2014
;Available from: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/28/robots-care-for-elderly_n_5331956.html
9.
Wu
Y
,
Wrobel
J
,
Cristancho-lacroix
V
,
Kamali
L
,
Chetouani
M
, &
Duhaut
D
: Designing an assistive robot for older adults : The ROBADOM project
2017
;34:119–123.
10.
Heerink
M
. Exploring the Influence of Age, Gender, Education and Computer Experience on Robot Acceptance by Older Adults; in : HRI’11.
2011
, pp 147–148.
11.
Renaud
K
. Biljon JVan: Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study.
SAICSIT 2008
.
Wilderness, South Africa
:
ACM
;
2008
. pp.
210
9
.
12.
Melenhorst
AS
,
Rogers
WA
,
Bouwhuis
DG
.
Older adults’ motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity
.
Psychol Aging
.
2006
Mar
;
21
(
1
):
190
5
.
[PubMed]
0882-7974
13.
Pino
M
,
Boulay
M
,
Jouen
F
,
Rigaud
AS
.
“Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots
.
Front Aging Neurosci
.
2015
Jul
;
7
:
141
.
[PubMed]
1663-4365
14.
Barnard
Y
,
Bradley
MD
,
Hodgson
F
,
Lloyd
AD
.
Learning to use new technologies by older adults: perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability
.
Comput Human Behav
.
2013
;
29
(
4
):
1715
24
. 0747-5632
15.
Davis
FD
,
Bagozzi
RP
,
Warshaw
PR
.
User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models
.
Manage Sci
.
1989
;
35
(
8
):
982
1003
. 0025-1909
16.
Venkatesh
M
,
Morris
,
Davis
,
Davis
.
Davis, &Davis: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view
.
Manage Inf Syst Q
.
2003
;
27
(
3
):
425
. 0276-7783
17.
Peek
ST
,
Wouters
EJ
,
van Hoof
J
,
Luijkx
KG
,
Boeije
HR
,
Vrijhoef
HJ
.
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review
.
Int J Med Inform
.
2014
Apr
;
83
(
4
):
235
48
.
[PubMed]
1386-5056
18.
Kamin
ST
,
Lang
FR
.
The subjective technology adaptivity inventory (STAI): A motivational measure of technology usage in old age
.
Gerontechnology (Valkenswaard)
.
2013
;
12
(
1
):
16
25
. 1569-1101
19.
Legris
P
,
Ingham
J
,
Collerette
P
.
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
.
Inf Manage
.
2003
;
40
(
3
):
191
204
. 0378-7206
20.
Ng
J
,
Tan
O
,
Wong
A
,
Kiat
KW
.
Older adults’ attitudes toward homes service robots
.
WASA
.
2012
;
1
:
87
90
.
21.
Smarr
CA
,
Prakash
A
,
Beer
JM
,
Mitzner
TL
,
Kemp
C
.
C., & Rogers WA: Older adults preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks.
Proc Hum Factors Erg Soc Annu Meet 2012
.
2012
;56:
153
157
.
22.
deGraaf
MM
,
Ben Allouch
S
.
Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots
.
Robot Auton Syst
.
2013
;
61
(
12
):
1476
86
. 0921-8890
23.
Fong
T
,
Nourbakhsh
I
,
Dautenhahn
K
.
A survey of socially interactive robots
.
Robot Auton Syst
.
2003
;
42
(
3-4
):
143
66
. 0921-8890
24.
Walters
ML
,
Syrdal
DS
,
Dautenhahn
K
,
TeBoekhorst
R
,
Koay
KL
.
Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion
.
Auton Robots
.
2008
;
24
(
2
):
159
78
. 0929-5593
25.
Yueh
H
,
Lin
W
.
Services, appearances and psychological factors in intelligent home service robots
; in : 8th International Conference of Cross-Cultural Design 2016. Toronto, ON, Canada,
2016
, pp 608–615.
26.
Mori
M
,
MacDorman
KF
,
Kageki
N
.
The uncanny valley
.
IEEE Robot Autom Mag
.
2012
;
19
(
2
):
98
100
. 1070-9932
27.
Rau
PL
,
Li
Y
,
Li
D
.
A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task
.
Int J Soc Robot
.
2010
;
2
(
2
):
175
86
. 1875-4791
28.
Carstensen
LL
.
Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity
.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci
.
1995
;
4
(
5
):
151
6
. 0963-7214
29.
Baltes
PB
,
Baltes
MM
. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation.
Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences
.
New York (NY)
:
Cambridge University Press
;
1990
. pp.
1
34
.
30.
Chen
K
,
Chan
AH
,
Chan
SC
.
Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM)
.
Ergonomics
.
2014
;
57
(
5
):
635
52
.
[PubMed]
0014-0139
31.
Shibata
T
,
Tanie
K
.
Physical and affective interaction between human and mental commit robot
; in :
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
.
2001
, pp
2572
2577
.
32.
Tashakkori
A
,
Teddlie
C
,
Sines
MC
.
Utilizing Mixed Methods in Psychological Research
. 2nd ed.
Handb Psychol
;
2012
.
33.
Damian
AM
,
Jacobson
SA
,
Hentz
JG
,
Belden
CM
,
Shill
HA
,
Sabbagh
MN
, et al.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the mini-mental state examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment: item analyses and threshold scores
.
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
.
2011
;
31
(
2
):
126
31
.
[PubMed]
1420-8008
34.
Heerink
M
,
Kröse
B
,
Evers
V
,
Wielinga
B
.
Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model
.
Int J Soc Robot
.
2010
;
2
(
4
):
361
75
. 1875-4791
35.
Smarr
CA
,
Mitzner
TL
,
Beer
JM
,
Prakash
A
,
Chen
TL
,
Kemp
CC
, et al.
Domestic Robots for older Adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential
.
Int J Soc Robot
.
2014
Apr
;
6
(
2
):
229
47
.
[PubMed]
1875-4791
36.
Bernotat
J
,
Eyssel
F
. A robot at home - How affect, technology commitment, and personality traits influence user experience in an intelligent robotics apartment. RO-MAN 2017 - 26th IEEE Int Symp Robot Hum Interact Commun
2017
;2017–Janua:641–646.
37.
Damholdt
MF
,
Nørskov
M
,
Yamazaki
R
,
Hakli
R
,
Hansen
CV
,
Vestergaard
C
, et al.
Attitudinal Change in Elderly Citizens Toward Social Robots: The Role of Personality Traits and Beliefs About Robot Functionality
.
Front Psychol
.
2015
Nov
;
6
:
1701
.
[PubMed]
1664-1078
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.