Background: The physical frailty assessment tools that are currently available are often time consuming to use with limited feasibility. Objective: To address these limitations, an instrumented trail-making task (iTMT) platform was developed using wearable technology to automate quantification of frailty phenotypes without the need of a frailty walking test. Methods: Sixty-one older adults (age = 72.8 ± 9.9 years, body mass index [BMI] = 27.4 ± 4.9 kg/m2) were recruited. According to the Fried Frailty Criteria, 39% of participants were determined as robust and 61% as non-robust (pre-frail or frail). In addition, 17 young subjects (age = 29.0 ± 7.2 years, BMI = 26.2 ± 4.6 kg/m2) were recruited to determine the healthy benchmark. The iTMT included reaching 5 indexed circles (including numbers 1-to-3 and letters A&B placed in random orders), which virtually appeared on a computer-screen, by rotating one’s ankle-joint while standing. By using an ankle-worn inertial sensor, 3D ankle-rotation was estimated and mapped into navigation of a computer-cursor in real-time (100 Hz), allowing subjects to navigate the computer-cursor to perform the iTMT. The ankle-sensor was also used for quantifying ankle-rotation velocity (representing slowness), its decline during the test (representing exhaustion), and ankle-velocity variability (representing movement inefficiency), as well as the power (representing weakness) generated during the test. Comparative assessments included Fried frailty phenotypes and gait assessment. Results: All subjects were able to complete the iTMT, with an average completion time of 125 ± 85 s. The iTMT-derived parameters were able to identify the presence and absence of slowness, exhaustion, weakness, and inactivity phenotypes (Cohen’s d effect size = 0.90–1.40). The iTMT Velocity was significantly different between groups (d = 0.62–1.47). Significant correlation was observed between the iTMT Velocity and gait speed (r = 0.684 p < 0.001). The iTMT-derived parameters and age together enabled significant distinguishing of non-robust cases with area under curve of 0.834, sensitivity of 83%, and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a non-gait-based wearable platform to objectively quantify frailty phenotypes and determine physical frailty, using a quick and practical test. This platform may address the hurdles of conventional physical frailty phenotypes methods by replacing the conventional frailty walking test with an automated and objective process that reduces the time of assessment and is more practical for those with mobility limitations.

Keywords:
Frailty, Instrumented trail-making task, Frailty phenotype, Gait, Wearable, Virtual-reality, Cognitive-motor test
1.
Fried LP, et al: Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56:M146–M156.
2.
Morley JE: Diabetes, sarcopenia, and frailty. Clin Geriatr Med 2008; 24: 455–469, vi.
3.
Janssen I, et al: Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 413–421.
4.
Makary MA, et al: Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 901–908.
5.
Mohler MJ, et al: The Frailty syndrome: clinical measurements and basic underpinnings in humans and animals. Exp Gerontol 2014; 54: 6–13.
6.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148.
7.
Goldstein JP, Andrew MK, Travers A: Frailty in older adults using pre-hospital care and the emergency department: a narrative review. Can Geriatr J 2012; 15: 16–22.
8.
Buchman A, et al: Change in frailty and risk of death in older persons. Exp Aging Res 2009; 35: 61–82.
9.
da Câmara SMA, et al: Using the short physical performance battery to screen for frailty in young-old adults with distinct socioeconomic conditions. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013; 13: 421–428.
10.
Verghese J, Xue X: Identifying frailty in high functioning older adults with normal mobility. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 382–385.
11.
Goel R, et al: Assessing somatosensory utilization during unipedal postural control. Front Syst Neurosci 2017; 11: 21.
12.
Wang C, et al: Low-power fall detector using triaxial accelerometry and barometric pressure sensing. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2016; 12: 2302–2311.
13.
Razjouyan J, et al: Wearable sensors and the assessment of frailty among vulnerable older adults: an observational cohort study. Sensors (Basel) 2018; 18:pii:E1336.
14.
Zahiri M, et al: Design and evaluation of a portable laparoscopic training system using virtual reality. J Med Device 2017; 11: 011002.
15.
Nguyen H, et al: Using inertial sensors to automatically detect and segment activities of daily living in people with Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2018; 26: 197–204.
16.
Zhou H, et al: Instrumented trail-making task to differentiate persons with no cognitive impairment, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer disease: a proof of concept study. Gerontology 2017; 63: 189–200.
17.
Zhou H, et al: Motor planning error: toward measuring cognitive frailty in older adults using wearables. Sensors (Basel) 2018; 18: pii:E926.
18.
Delbaere K, et al: The falls efficacy scale international (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age Ageing 2010; 39: 210–216.
19.
Weissman MM, et al: Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study. Am J Epidemiol 1977; 106: 203–214.
20.
Najafi B, et al: Does walking strategy in older people change as a function of walking distance? Gait Posture 2009; 29: 261–266.
21.
Grewal G, et al: Virtualizing the assessment: a novel pragmatic paradigm to evaluate lower extremity joint perception in diabetes. Gerontology 2012; 58: 463–471.
22.
Najafi B, et al: Assessing postural control and postural control strategy in diabetes patients using innovative and wearable technology. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010; 4: 780–791.
23.
Najafi B, et al: Estimation of center of mass trajectory using wearable sensors during golf swing. J Sports Sci Med 2015; 14: 354–363.
24.
Grewal GS, et al: Sensor-based interactive balance training with visual joint movement feedback for improving postural stability in diabetics with peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontology 2015; 61: 567–574.
25.
Lee H, et al: Toward using a smartwatch to monitor frailty in a hospital setting: using a single wrist-wearable sensor to assess frailty in bedbound inpatients. Gerontology 2018; 64: 389–400.
26.
Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (ed 2). Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1988.
27.
Schwenk M, et al: Frailty and technology: a systematic review of gait analysis in those with frailty. Gerontology 2014; 60: 79–89.
28.
Gary R: Evaluation of frailty in older adults with cardiovascular disease: incorporating physical performance measures. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2012; 27: 120–131.
29.
Schwenk M, et al: Wearable sensor-based in-home assessment of gait, balance, and physical activity for discrimination of frailty status: baseline results of the Arizona frailty cohort study. Gerontology 2015; 61: 258–67.
30.
Najafi B, et al: The impact of footwear and walking distance on gait stability in diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2013; 103: 165–173.
31.
Toosizadeh N, Mohler J, Najafi B: Assessing upper extremity motion: an innovative method to identify frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015; 63: 1181–1186.
32.
Fried LP, Walston J. Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Ettinger WH, Jr, Halter JB, Ouslander J: Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology (ed 4). New York, McGraw Hill, 1998, pp 1387–1402.
33.
O’Connor SM, Xu HZ, Kuo AD: Energetic cost of walking with increased step variability. Gait Posture 2012; 36: 102–107.
34.
Montero-Odasso M, et al: Gait variability is associated with frailty in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2011; 66: 568–576.
35.
Shimada H, et al: Cognitive frailty and incidence of dementia in older persons. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis 2018; 5: 42–48.
36.
Kelaiditi E, et al: Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging 2013; 17: 726–734.
37.
Ruan Q, et al: Cognitive frailty, a novel target for the prevention of elderly dependency. Ageing Res Rev 2015; 20: 1–10.
38.
Dierckx E, et al: Mild cognitive impairment: what’s in a name? Gerontology 2007; 53: 28–35.
39.
Buckinx F, et al: Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Health 2015; 73: 19.
40.
Joseph B, et al: Upper-extremity function predicts adverse health outcomes among older adults hospitalized for ground-level falls. Gerontology 2017; 63: 299–307.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.