Background: Academics have long called for greater interaction between gerontologists and legal scholars. However, prior studies have suggested that disciplinary borders remain a barrier to such interaction, hampering gerontology’s ability to function as a truly multi- or interdisciplinary field. Objective: This study was designed to understand the nature of current interactions between legal scholars and gerontologists, and to identify opportunities to advance scientific dialogue and cooperation between the two. Methods: Semi-structured, open-ended interviews with 27 participants (12 elder law scholars, 15 gerontologists) were conducted by phone, recorded, and analyzed by an interdisciplinary team. Results: Both elder law scholars and gerontologists indicate that their field would benefit from research collaboration and cross-disciplinary teaching with the other field, but the fields remain distinct with little cross-disciplinary learning. Participants identified a series of opportunities, however, for increasing such learning and collaboration. Conclusions: The authors identify ways gerontologists can be encouraged to integrate elder law into their teaching and research, and suggest how this integration could enhance understanding of the aging experience.

Keywords:
Elder Law, Law and ageing, Gerontological education, Geriatric jurisprudence, Cross-disciplinary training
1.
Cohen ES: Law and aging, lawyers and gerontologists. Gerontologist 1978; 18: 229.
2.
Doron I: Theories on Law and Ageing: The Jurisprudence of Elder Law. Berlin, Springer; 2008.
3.
Kohn N: Elder Law: Practice, Policy and Problems. Durham, Walter-Kluwer, 2014.
4.
Kapp MB: The Law and Older Persons: Is Geriatric Jurisprudence Therapeutic? New York, Carolina Academic Press, 2003.
5.
Kohn NA, Spurgeon ED: A call to action on elder law education: an assessment and recommendations based on a national survey. Elder LJ 2013; 21: 345.
6.
Werner P, Doron I: Alzheimer’s disease and the law: positive and negative consequences of structural stigma and labeling in the legal system. Aging Ment Health 2017; 21: 1206–1213.
7.
Doron I, Meenan H: Time for geriatric -jurisprudence. Gerontology 2012; 58: 193–196.
8.
Kohn NA, Spurgeon ED: Elder law teaching and scholarship: an empirical analysis of an evolving field. J Legal Educ 2010; 59: 414–431.
9.
Kohn NA, Brown M, Doron IA: Identifying connections between gerontology and elder law: implications and strategies for teaching, research, and practice. Elder Law J 2017; 25: 69–100.
10.
Numhauseer-Henning A: Elder Law: Evolving European Perspectives. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2017.
11.
Patton MQ: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newburry Park, SAGE Publications, 1990.
12.
Doron I: Elder Law: Current issues and future frontiers. Eur J Aging 2006; 3: 60–66.
13.
Wilmoth JM, Ferraro KF: Gerontology Perspectives and Issues. New York, Springer, 2013.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.