Background: Specific dual-task (DT) training is effective to improve DT performance in trained tasks in patients with dementia (PwD). However, it remains an open research question whether successfully trained DTs show a transfer effect to untrained DT performances. Objective: To examine transfer effects and the sustainability of a specific DT training in PwD. Methods: One hundred and five patients with mild-to-moderate dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination: 21.9 ± 2.8 points) participated in a 10-week randomized, controlled trial. The intervention group (IG) underwent a specific DT training (“walking and counting”). The control group (CG) performed unspecific low-intensity exercise. DT performance was measured under three conditions: (1) “walking and counting” (trained); (2) “walking and verbal fluency” (semi-trained), and (3) “strength and verbal fluency” (untrained). Outcomes evaluated at baseline, after training, and 3 months after the intervention period included absolute values for the motor and cognitive performance under DT conditions, and relative DT costs (DTCs) in motor, cognitive and combined motor-cognitive performance. Results: The IG significantly improved DT performances in the trained condition for absolute motor and cognitive performance and for motor, cognitive, and combined motor-cognitive DTCs compared to the CG (p ≤ 0.001–0.047; ηp2 = 0.044–0.249). Significant transfer effects were found in the semi-trained condition for absolute motor and partly cognitive performance, and for motor but not for cognitive DTCs, and only partly for combined DTCs (p ≤ 0.001–0.041; ηp2 = 0.049–0.150). No significant transfer effects were found in the untrained condition. Three months after training cessation, DT performance in the trained condition was still elevated for most of the outcomes (p ≤ 0.001–0.038; ηp2 = 0.058–0.187). Training gains in the DT performance in the semi-trained condition were, however, not sustained, and no significant group differences were found in the DT performance in the untrained condition after the follow-up. Conclusion: This study confirmed that specific DT training is effective in improving specifically trained DT performances in PwD and demonstrated sustainability of training-induced effects for at least 3 months. Effects were partially transferable to semi-trained DTs but not to untrained DTs. With increasing distance between trained and untrained DTs, transferability of training effects decreased.

Keywords:
Dementia, Attention, Dual tasking, Exercise training, Transfer effects, Rehabilitation
1.
Baddeley AD, Baddeley HA, Bucks RS, Wilcock GK: Attentional control in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2001; 124: 1492–1508.
2.
Perry RJ, Hodges JR: Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. A critical review. Brain 1999; 122: 383–404.
3.
Montero-Odasso MM, Sarquis-Adamson Y, Speechley M, Borrie MJ, Hachinski VC, Wells J, Riccio PM, Schapira M, Sejdic E, Camicioli RM, Bartha R, McIlroy WE, Muir-Hunter S: Association of dual-task gait with incident dementia in mild cognitive impairment: results from the Gait and Brain Study. JAMA Neurol 2017; 74: 857–865.
4.
Hauer K, Marburger C, Oster P: Motor performance deteriorates with simultaneously performed cognitive tasks in geriatric patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 217–223.
5.
Hauer K, Pfisterer M, Weber C, Wezler N, Kliegel M, Oster P: Cognitive impairment decreases postural control during dual tasks in geriatric patients with a history of severe falls. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51: 1638–1644.
6.
Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A: Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002; 16: 1–14.
7.
Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y: “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 1997; 349: 617.
8.
Verghese J, Buschke H, Viola L, Katz M, Hall C, Kuslansky G, Lipton R: Validity of divided attention tasks in predicting falls in older individuals: a preliminary study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 1572–1576.
9.
Montero-Odasso M, Verghese J, Beauchet O, Hausdorff JM: Gait and cognition: a complementary approach to understanding brain function and the risk of falling. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: 2127–2136.
10.
Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N: The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord 2008; 23: 329–342; quiz 472.
11.
Coelho FG, Andrade LP, Pedroso RV, Santos-Galduroz RF, Gobbi S, Costa JL, Gobbi LT: Multimodal exercise intervention improves frontal cognitive functions and gait in Alzheimer’s disease: a controlled trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013; 13: 198–203.
12.
de Andrade LP, Gobbi LT, Coelho FG, Christofoletti G, Costa JL, Stella F: Benefits of multimodal exercise intervention for postural control and frontal cognitive functions in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease: a controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61: 1919–1926.
13.
Schwenk M, Zieschang T, Oster P, Hauer K: Dual-task performances can be improved in patients with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2010; 74: 1961–1968.
14.
Suzuki T, Shimada H, Makizako H, Doi T, Yoshida D, Tsutsumimoto K, Anan Y, Uemura K, Lee S, Park H: Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 128.
15.
Barnett SM, Ceci SJ: When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychol Bull 2002; 128: 612–637.
16.
Zelinski EM: Far transfer in cognitive training of older adults. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009; 27: 455–471.
17.
Bherer L, Kramer AF, Peterson MS, Colcombe S, Erickson K, Becic E: Training effects on dual-task performance: are there age-related differences in plasticity of attentional control? Psychol Aging 2005; 20: 695–709.
18.
Bherer L, Kramer AF, Peterson MS, Colcombe S, Erickson K, Becic E: Transfer effects in task-set cost and dual-task cost after dual-task training in older and younger adults: further evidence for cognitive plasticity in attentional control in late adulthood. Exp Aging Res 2008; 34: 188–219.
19.
Ho G, Scialfa CT: Age, skill transfer, and conjunction search. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002; 57:P277–P287.
20.
Kramer A, Larish J, Strayer D: Training for attentional control in dual task settings: a comparison of young and old adults. J Exp Psychol 1995; 1: 50–76.
21.
Lussier M, Brouillard P, Bherer L: Limited benefits of heterogeneous dual-task training on transfer effects in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2017; 72: 801–812.
22.
Lussier M, Bugaiska A, Bherer L: Specific transfer effects following variable priority dual-task training in older adults. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2017; 35: 237–250.
23.
Lussier M, Gagnon C, Bherer L: An investigation of response and stimulus modality transfer effects after dual-task training in younger and older. Front Hum Neurosci 2012; 6: 129.
24.
Silsupadol P, Siu KC, Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH: Training of balance under single- and dual-task conditions in older adults with balance impairment. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 269–281.
25.
Silsupadol P, Lugade V, Shumway-Cook A, van Donkelaar P, Chou LS, Mayr U, Woollacott MH: Training-related changes in dual-task walking performance of elderly persons with balance impairment: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture 2009; 29: 634–639.
26.
Wongcharoen S, Sungkarat S, Munkhetvit P, Lugade V, Silsupadol P: Home-based interventions improve trained, but not novel, dual-task balance performance in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture 2017; 52: 147–152.
27.
Eggenberger P, Theill N, Holenstein S, Schumacher V, de Bruin ED: Multicomponent physical exercise with simultaneous cognitive training to enhance dual-task walking of older adults: a secondary analysis of a 6-month randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Clin Interv Aging 2015; 10: 1711–1732.
28.
Dorfman M, Herman T, Brozgol M, Shema S, Weiss A, Hausdorff JM, Mirelman A: Dual-task training on a treadmill to improve gait and cognitive function in elderly idiopathic fallers. J Neurol Phys Ther 2014; 38: 246–253.
29.
Silsupadol P, Shumway-Cook A, Lugade V, van Donkelaar P, Chou LS, Mayr U, Woollacott MH: Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 381–387.
30.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189–198.
31.
Morris JC, Mohs RC, Rogers H, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A: Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; 24: 641–652.
32.
Oswald WD, Fleischmann UM: Das Nürnberger-Alters-Inventar (NAI): Testinventar und NAI-Testmanual und -Textband. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1999.
33.
Aebi C: Validierung der neuropsychologischen Testbatterie CERAD-NP. Eine Multi-Center Studie; thesis, Basel, 2002.
34.
Wei L-J: A class of designs for sequential clinical trials. J Am Stat Assoc 1977; 72: 382–386.
35.
Wiloth S, Werner C, Lemke NC, Bauer J, Hauer K: Motor-cognitive effects of a computerized game-based training method in people with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Ment Health 2017, Epub ahead of print.
36.
Werner C, Wiloth S, Lemke NC, Kronbach F, Jansen CP, Oster P, Bauer JM, Hauer K: People with dementia can learn compensatory movement maneuvers for the sit-to-stand task: a randomized controlled trial. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 60: 107–120.
37.
Kitwood T, Bredin K: Towards a theory of dementia care: personhood and well-being. Ageing Soc 1992; 12: 269–287.
38.
Almeida OP, Almeida SA: Short versions of the geriatric depression scale: a study of their validity for the diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999; 14: 858–865.
39.
Hauer KA, Kempen GI, Schwenk M, Yardley L, Beyer N, Todd C, Oster P, Zijlstra GA: Validity and sensitivity to change of the falls efficacy scales international to assess fear of falling in older adults with and without cognitive impairment. Gerontology 2011; 57: 462–472.
40.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142–148.
41.
Tinetti ME: Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986; 34: 119–126.
42.
Lemke NC, Wiloth S, Werner C, Hauer K: Validity, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change and feasibility of motor-cognitive dual task assessments in patients with dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2017; 70: 169–179.
43.
Menz HB, Latt MD, Tiedemann A, Mun San Kwan M, Lord SR: Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Gait Posture 2004; 20: 20–25.
44.
Abernethy B: Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: some applications and methodological constraints. J Hum Mov Stud 1988; 14: 101–132.
45.
Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, Routledge, 1988.
46.
Hauer K, Schwenk M, Zieschang T, Essig M, Becker C, Oster P: Physical training improves motor performance in people with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: 8–15.
47.
Naumann T, Kindermann S, Joch M, Munzert J, Reiser M: No transfer between conditions in balance training regimes relying on tasks with different postural demands: specificity effects of two different serious games. Gait Posture 2015; 41: 774–779.
48.
Lezak M, Howieson D, Bigler E, Tranel D: Neuropsychological Assessment. New York, Oxford University Press, 2012.
49.
Dick MB, Hsieh S, Bricker J, Dick-Muehlke C: Facilitating acquisition and transfer of a continuous motor task in healthy older adults and patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 2003; 17: 202–212.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.