Background: Losing one’s spouse is one of the most stressful life events in old age, yet research on positive consequences of overcoming critical life events describes experiences of personal growth for survivors. Objective: Because prior studies conceptualized personal growth as a stable accomplishment of an individual, our study challenges this assumption by examining trajectories of personal growth and its links to two aspects of social support. We assume that personal growth is boosted by heightened levels of loss-related social support seeking during early years of widowhood. However, toward the later stages in the bereavement process, we expect personal growth to be fostered by perceived social embeddedness. Data and Method: Data stem from a survey on relationships in later life conducted in 2012, 2014, and 2016 in Switzerland. The final analytical sample consisted of 508 individuals aged 50+ years, who were on average 73 years old and widowed for about 3 years at baseline. Longitudinal explorative factor analyses yielded a 3-factorial solution for personal growth. Random-effects group-specific growth curves were used to examine the trajectories of personal growth and its subdimensions, by different levels of loss-related social support seeking and embeddedness in a supportive network, over the first 8 years of widowhood. Our analyses included time-invariant and time-varying covariates. Results: On average, our findings point to a stable trajectory of personal growth after having become widowed in later life. Group-specific analyses, however, showed different courses in the trajectories for specific subdimensions of personal growth – particularly for spiritual change and appreciation of life. Average marginal effects also yielded group differences by loss-related support seeking in the level of personal growth over time, which highlight the importance of social support seeking, rather than social embeddedness, at all stages of the bereavement process. Conclusion: Findings underline the importance of a longitudinal and linked-lives perspective on personal growth and point to different pathways regarding its various subdimensions. Future research should further examine the validity of personal growth scales for other populations and consider the possibility to experience personal growth already during the anticipation of a traumatic event (e.g., in the case of long-term caretaking).

1.
Bennett KM, Soulsby LK: Wellbeing in bereavement and widowhood. Illn Crises Loss 2011; 20: 321–337.
2.
Zivin K, Christakis NA: The emotional toll of spousal morbidity and mortality. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007; 15: 772–779.
3.
Helgeson VS, Reynolds KA, Tomich PL: A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74: 797–816.
4.
Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA: Posttraumatic growth after cancer; in Calhoun LG, Tedeschi R (eds): Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice. New York, Psychological Press, 2006, pp 138–175.
5.
Studley B, Chung MC: Posttraumatic stress and well-being following relationship dissolution: coping, posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms from past trauma, and traumatic growth. J Loss Trauma 2015; 20: 317–335.
6.
Armstrong D, Shakespeare-Finch J: Relationship to the bereaved and perceptions of severity of trauma differentiate elements of posttraumatic growth. Omega (Westport) 2011; 63: 125–140.
7.
Tashiro TY, Frazier P: “I’ll never be in a relationship like that again”: personal growth following romantic relationship breakups. Pers Relatsh 2003; 10: 113–128.
8.
Zoellner T, Maercker A: Posttraumatic growth in clinical psychology: a critical review and introduction of a two component model. Clin Psychol Rev 2006; 26: 626–653.
9.
Bookwala J, Marshall KI, Manning SW: Who needs a friend? Marital status transitions and physical health outcomes in later life. Health Psychology 2014; 33: 505–515.
10.
Hollstein B: Soziale Netzwerke nach der Verwitwung: Eine Rekonstruktion der Verände-rungen informeller Beziehungen [Social Networks after Widowhood: A Reconstruction of Change in Informal Relationships]. Opladen, Leske + Budrich, 2002.
11.
Li Y: Recovering from spousal bereavement in later life: does volunteer participation play a role? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2007; 62: 257–266.
12.
Utz RL, Reidy EB, Carr D, Nesse R, Wortman C: The daily consequences of widowhood: the role of gender and intergenerational transfers on subsequent housework performance. J Fam Issues 2004; 25: 683–712.
13.
Stevens NL, Martina CM, Westerhof GJ: Meeting the need to belong: predicting effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. Gerontologist 2006; 46: 495–502.
14.
Spahni S, Morselli D, Perrig-Chiello P, Bennett KM: Patterns of psychological adaptation to spousal bereavement in old age. Gerontology 2015; 61: 456–468.
15.
Mancini AD, Bonanno GA, Clark AE: Stepping off the hedonic treadmill. J Individ Differ 2011; 32: 144–152.
16.
Martin LG: Demography & aging; in Binstock RH, George LK (eds): Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. San Diego, Elsevier Academic Press, 2011, pp 33–56.
17.
Settersten RA Jr, Trauten ME: The new terrain of old age: hallmarks, freedoms, and risks; in Bengston VL, Gans D, Pulney N, Norella M, Silverstein M (eds): Handbook of Theories of Aging. New York, Springer, 2009, pp 455–469.
18.
Cheng ST, Chan AC: Relationship with others and life satisfaction in later life: do gender and widowhood make a difference? J Gerontol B Psychol Soc Sci 2006; 61: 46–53.
19.
Rossi NE, Bisconti TL, Bergeman C: The role of dispositional resilience in regaining life satisfaction after the loss of a spouse. Death Stud 2007; 31: 863–883.
20.
Zettel LA, Rook KS: Substitution and compensation in the social networks of older widowed women. Psychol Aging 2004; 19: 433–443.
21.
Infurna FJ, Wiest M, Gerstorf D, Ram N, Schupp J, Wagner GG, Heckhausen J: Changes in life satisfaction when losing one’s spouse: individual differences in anticipation, reaction, adaptation and longevity in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Ageing Soc 2017; 37: 899–934.
22.
Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG: Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psycholl Inq 2004; 15: 1–18.
23.
Currier JM, Holland JM, Neimeyer RA: Prolonged grief symptoms and growth in the first 2 years of bereavement: evidence for a nonlinear association. Traumatology 2012; 18: 65–71.
24.
Caserta M, Lund D, Utz R, De Vries B: Stress-related growth among the recently bereaved. Aging Ment Health 2009; 13: 463–476.
25.
Barskova T, Österreich R: Post-traumatic growth in people living with a serious medical condition and its relations to physical and mental health: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1709–1733.
26.
Bower JE, Low CA, Tedlie Moskowitz J, Sepah S, Epel E: Benefit finding and physical health: Positive psychological changes and enhanced allostasis. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2008; 2: 223–244.
27.
Guiaux M, Van Tilburg T, Van Groenou MB: Changes in contact and support exchange in personal networks after widowhood. Pers Relatsh 2007; 14: 457–473.
28.
Michael C, Cooper M: Post-traumatic growth following bereavement: a systematic review of the literature. Couns Psychol Rev 2013; 28: 18–33.
29.
Schaefer J, Moos R: The context for posttraumatic growth: life crises, individual and social resources, and coping; in Tedeschi RG, Park C, Calhoun L (eds): Posttraumatic Growth: Positive Changes in the Aftermath of Crisis. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 1998, pp 99–126.
30.
Prati G, Pietrantoni L: Optimism, social support, and coping strategies as factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: a meta-analysis. J Loss Trauma 2009; 14: 364–388.
31.
Park CL, Cohen LH, Murch RL: Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. J Personal 1996; 64: 71–105.
32.
Milam JE, Ritt-Olson A, Unger JB: Post-traumatic growth among adolescents. J Adolesc Res 2004; 19: 192–204.
33.
Polatinsky S, Esprey Y: An assessment of gender differences in the perception of benefit resulting from the loss of a child. J Trauma Stress 2000; 13: 709–718.
34.
Cann A, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, Taku K, Vishnevsky T, Triplett KN, Danhauer SC: A short form of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory. Anxiety Stress Coping 2010; 23: 127–137.
35.
Skinner EA, Edge K, Altman J, Sherwood H: Searching for the structure of coping: a review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol Bull 2003; 129: 216–269.
36.
Gierveld JDJ, Van Tilburg T: A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness confirmatory tests on survey data. Res Aging 2006; 28: 582–598.
37.
Singer JD, Willett JB: Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003.
38.
Znoj H: Bereavement and posttraumatic growth; in Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (eds): Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice. New York, Psychology Press, 2006, pp 176–196.
39.
Charles ST: Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychol Bull 2010; 136: 1068–1091.
40.
Chen E, Miller GE: “Shift-and-persist” strategies: why low socioeconomic status isn’t always bad for health. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012; 7: 135–158.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.