Forensic genetics developed from protein-based techniques a quarter of a century ago and became famous as “DNA fingerprinting,” this being based on restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) of high-molecular-weight DNA. The amplification of much smaller short tandem repeat (STR) sequences using the polymerase chain reaction soon replaced RFLP analysis and advanced to become the gold standard in genetic identification. Meanwhile, STR multiplexes have been developed and made commercially available which simultaneously amplify up to 30 STR loci from as little as 15 cells or fewer. The enormous information content that comes with the large variety of observed STR genotypes allows for genetic individualisation (with the exception of identical twins). Carefully selected core STR loci form the basis of intelligence-led DNA databases that provide investigative leads by linking unsolved crime scenes and criminals through their matched STR profiles. Nevertheless, the success of modern DNA fingerprinting depends on the availability of reference material from suspects. In order to provide new investigative leads in cases where such reference samples are absent, forensic scientists started to explore the prediction of phenotypic traits from the DNA of the evidentiary sample. This paradigm change now uses DNA and epigenetic markers to forecast characteristics that are useful to triage further investigative work. So far, the best investigated externally visible characteristics are eye, hair and skin colour, as well as geographic ancestry and age. Information on the chronological age of a stain donor (or any sample donor) is elemental for forensic investigations in a number of aspects and has, therefore, been explored by researchers in some detail. Among different methodological approaches tested to date, the methylation-sensitive analysis of carefully selected DNA markers (CpG sites) has brought the most promising results by providing prediction accuracies of ±3–4 years, which can be comparable to, or even surpass those from, eyewitness reports. This mini-review puts recent developments in age estimation via (epi)genetic methods in the context of the requirements and goals of forensic genetics and highlights paths to follow in the future of forensic genomics.

Keywords:
Chronological age, Forensic DNA fingerprinting, Predictive DNA analysis, Genetic ancestry, Forensic genetics, DNA databasing, Short tandem repeats, CpG sites, Forensic DNA phenotyping
1.
Jeffreys AJ: Genetic fingerprinting. Nat Med 2005; 11: 1035–1039.
2.
Tautz D, Renz M: Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1984; 12: 4127–4138.
3.
Gill P, Ivanov PL, Kimpton C, Piercy R, Benson N, Tully G, et al: Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nat Genet 1994; 6: 130–135.
4.
Jobling MA: Curiosity in the genes: the DNA fingerprinting story. Investig Genet 2013; 4: 20.
5.
Pereira L, Alshamali F, Andreassen R, Ballard R, Chantratita W, Cho NS, et al: PopAffiliator: online calculator for individual affiliation to a major population group based on 17 autosomal short tandem repeat genotype profile. Int J Legal Med 2011; 125: 629–636.
6.
Eduardoff M, Gross TE, Santos C, de la Puente M, Ballard D, Strobl C, et al: Inter-laboratory evaluation of the EUROFORGEN Global ancestry-informative SNP panel by massively parallel sequencing using the Ion PGMTM. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2016; 23: 178–189.
7.
Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Lagace R, Chang J, Wootton S, et al: Current sequencing technology makes microhaplotypes a powerful new type of genetic marker for forensics. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2014; 12: 215–224.
8.
Kayser M: Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2015; 18: 33–48.
9.
Meissner C, Ritz-Timme S: Molecular pathology and age estimation. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 203: 34–43.
10.
Bauer CM, Niederstatter H, McGlynn G, Stadler H, Parson W: Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2013; 7: 581–586.
11.
Alkass K, Buchholz BA, Ohtani S, Yamamoto T, Druid H, Spalding KL: Age estimation in forensic sciences: application of combined aspartic acid racemization and radiocarbon analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 9: 1022–1030.
12.
Calloway CD, Reynolds RL, Herrin GL Jr, Anderson WW: The frequency of heteroplasmy in the HVII region of mtDNA differs across tissue types and increases with age. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1384–1397.
13.
Karlsson AO, Svensson A, Marklund A, Holm<X00_Del_TrennDivis>- l</X00_Del_TrennDivis>und G: Estimating human age in forensic samples by analysis of telomere repeats. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 2008; 1: 569–571.
14.
Zubakov D, Liu F, van Zelm MC, Vermeulen J, Oostra BA, van Duijn CM, et al: Estimating human age from T-cell DNA rearrangements. Curr Biol 2010; 20:R970–R971.
15.
Horvath S, Zhang Y, Langfelder P, Kahn RS, Boks MP, van Eijk K, et al: Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue. Genet Biol 2012; 13:R97.
16.
Pan F, Chiu CH, Pulapura S, Mehan MR, Nunez-Iglesias J, Zhang K, et al: Gene Aging Nexus: a web database and data mining platform for microarray data on aging. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:D756–D759.
17.
Freire-Aradas A, Phillips C, Lareu MV: Forensic individual age estimation with DNA: from initial approaches to methylation tests. Forensic Sci Rev 2017; 29: 121–144.
18.
Zubakov D, Liu F, Kokmeijer I, Choi Y, van Meurs JB, van IWF, et al: Human age estimation from blood using mRNA, DNA methylation, DNA rearrangement, and telomere length. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2016; 24: 33–43.
19.
Bocklandt S, Lin W, Sehl ME, Sanchez FJ, Sinsheimer JS, Horvath S, et al: Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS One 2011; 6:e14821.
20.
Bibikova M, Barnes B, Tsan C, Ho V, Klotzle B, Le JM, et al: High density DNA methylation array with single CpG site resolution. Genomics 2011; 98: 288–295.
21.
Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S, et al: Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol Cell 2013; 49: 359–367.
22.
Koch CM, Wagner W: Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging (Albany NY) 2011; 3: 1018–1027.
23.
Garagnani P, Bacalini MG, Pirazzini C, Gori D, Giuliani C, Mari D, et al: Methylation of ELOVL2 gene as a new epigenetic marker of age. Aging Cell 2012; 11: 1132–1134.
24.
Weidner CI, Lin Q, Koch CM, Eisele L, Beier F, Ziegler P, et al: Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites. Genet Biol 2014; 15:R24.
25.
Zbiec-Piekarska R, Spolnicka M, Kupiec T, Makowska Z, Spas A, Parys-Proszek A, et al: Examination of DNA methylation status of the ELOVL2 marker may be useful for human age prediction in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2015; 14: 161–167.
26.
Zbiec-Piekarska R, Spolnicka M, Kupiec T, Parys-Proszek A, Makowska Z, Paleczka A, et al: Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA methylation analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2015; 17: 173–179.
27.
Park JL, Kim JH, Seo E, Bae DH, Kim SY, Lee HC, et al: Identification and evaluation of age-correlated DNA methylation markers for forensic use. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2016; 23: 64–70.
28.
Bekaert B, Kamalandua A, Zapico SC, Van de Voorde W, Decorte R: Improved age determination of blood and teeth samples using a selected set of DNA methylation markers. Epigenetics 2015; 10: 922–930.
29.
Freire-Aradas A, Phillips C, Mosquera-Miguel A, Giron-Santamaria L, Gomez-Tato A, Casares de Cal M, et al: Development of a methylation marker set for forensic age estimation using analysis of public methylation data and the Agena Bioscience EpiTYPER system. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2016; 24: 65–74.
30.
Huang Y, Yan J, Hou J, Fu X, Li L, Hou Y: Developing a DNA methylation assay for human age prediction in blood and bloodstain. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2015; 17: 129–136.
31.
Vidaki A, Ballard D, Aliferi A, Miller TH, Barron LP, Syndercombe Court D: DNA methylation-based forensic age prediction using artificial neural networks and next generation sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2017; 28: 225–236.
32.
Xu C, Qu H, Wang G, Xie B, Shi Y, Yang Y, et al: A novel strategy for forensic age prediction by DNA methylation and support vector regression model. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 17788.
33.
Yi SH, Jia YS, Mei K, Yang RZ, Huang DX: Age-related DNA methylation changes for forensic age-prediction. Int J Legal Med 2015; 129: 237–244.
34.
Yi SH, Xu LC, Mei K, Yang RZ, Huang DX: Isolation and identification of age-related DNA methylation markers for forensic age-prediction. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2014; 11: 117–125.
35.
Soares Bispo Santos Silva D, Antunes J, Balamurugan K, Duncan G, Sampaio Alho C, McCord B: Evaluation of DNA methylation markers and their potential to predict human aging. Electrophoresis 2015; 36: 1775–1780.
36.
Lee HY, Jung SE, Oh YN, Choi A, Yang WI, Shin KJ: Epigenetic age signatures in the forensically relevant body fluid of semen: a preliminary study. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2015; 19: 28–34.
37.
Giuliani C, Cilli E, Bacalini MG, Pirazzini C, Sazzini M, Gruppioni G, et al: Inferring chronological age from DNA methylation patterns of human teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol 2016; 159: 585–595.
38.
Naue J, Hoefsloot HCJ, Mook ORF, Rijlaarsdam-Hoekstra L, van der Zwalm MCH, Henneman P, et al: Chronological age prediction based on DNA methylation: massive parallel sequencing and random forest regression. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2017; 31: 19–28.
39.
Eduardoff M, Xavier C, Strobl C, Casas-Vargas A, Parson W: Optimized mtDNA control region primer extension capture analysis for forensically relevant samples and highly compromised mtDNA of different age and ori gin. Genes (Basel) 2017, DOI: 10.3390/genes8100237.
40.
Cho S, Jung SE, Hong SR, Lee EH, Lee JH, Lee SD, et al: Independent validation of DNA-based approaches for age prediction in blood. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2017; 29: 250–256.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.