Background: More recent birth cohorts of older people have better physical and cognitive status than earlier cohorts. As such, this could be expected to diminish the need for institutional care. The prediction of the future need for institutional care provides essential information for the planning and delivery of future care and social services as well as the resources needed. Objective: To predict the future need for institutional care among older Finnish people born in 1940. Methods: Representative samples of home-dwelling 70-year-olds from Turku, Finland were examined with similar methods in 1991 (those born in 1920) (n = 1,032) and in 2011 (those born in 1940) (n = 956). Predictors of institutionalization rates from the earlier 1920 cohort, together with data of sociodemographic factors, health, psychosocial and physical status, the need for help, and health behavior, were used to predict the future institutionalization rate among the 1940 cohort in this study using Cox regression models. Results: Health as well as psychosocial and physical status were significantly better in the 1940 cohort compared to the earlier cohort. In the 1940 cohort, the predicted rates of institutionalization were 1.8, 10.4, and 26.0% at the ages of 80 (year 2020), 85 (year 2025), and 90 years (year 2030), respectively. At every age (80, 85, and 90 years), the predicted rates of institutionalization by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were about two-fold among those with MMSE scores 18-26 (3.0-38.8%) compared to those with scores 27-30 (1.6-23.7%) and those with a body mass index (BMI) <25 (2.5-34.3%) compared to those with a BMI of 25-29.9 (1.4-20.9%), and about three-fold among participants with several falls (5.3-57.0%) compared to participants with no falls (1.5-23.1%). Conclusions: The 1940 cohort performed better in health as well as psychosocial and physical status than the 1920 cohort. Nevertheless, the predicted rates of future need for institutional care were high, especially at the ages of 85 and 90 years, among those with a lowered cognitive or physical status.

1.
Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vauperl JW: Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 2009;374:1196-1208.
2.
Engberg H, Christensen K, Andersen-Ranberg K, Vaupel JW, Jeune B: Improving activities of daily living in Danish centenarians - but only in women: a comparative study of two birth cohorts born in 1895 and 1905. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63:1186-1192.
3.
Pitkälä KH, Valvanne J, Kulp S, Strandberg TE, Tilvis RS: Secular trends in self-reported functioning, need for assistance and attitudes towards life: 10-year differences of three older cohorts. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:596-600.
4.
Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF: Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;288:3137-3146.
5.
Wilhelmson K, Allebeck P, Steen B: Improved health among 70-year olds: comparison of health indicators in three different birth cohorts. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002;14:361-370.
6.
Crimmins EM: Trends in the health of the elderly. Annu Rev Public Health 2004;25:79-98.
7.
Manton KG, Gu X, Lamb VL: Change in chronic disability from 1982 to 2004/2005 as measured by long-term changes in function and health in the U.S. elderly population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:18374-18379.
8.
Robine JM: Trends in population health. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:349-351.
9.
Zunzunegui MV, Nunez O, Durban M, Garcia de Yebenes MJ, Otero A: Decreasing prevalence of disability in activities of daily living, functional limitations and poor self-rated health: a 6-year follow-up study in Spain. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:352-358.
10.
Christensen K, Thinggaard M, Oksuzyan A, Steenstrup T, Andersen-Ranberg K, Jeune B, McGue M, Vaupel JW: Physical and cognitive functioning of people older than 90 years: a comparison of two Danish cohorts born 10 years apart. Lancet 2013;382:1507-1513.
11.
Litwin H, Shrira A, Shmotkin D: Self-reported functional status among the old-old: a comparison of two Israeli cohorts. J Aging Health 2012;24:846-862.
12.
Falk H, Johansson L, Östling S, Thøgersen Agerholm K, Staun M, Høst Dørfinger L, Skoog I: Functional disability and ability 75-year-olds: a comparison of two Swedish cohorts born 30 years apart. Age Ageing 2014;43:636-641.
13.
Hörder H, Skoog I, Johansson L, Falk H, Frändin K: Secular trends in frailty: a comparative study of 75-year olds born in 1911-12 and 1930. Age Ageing 2015;44:817-822.
14.
Olshansky SJ: Trading off longer life for worsening health. The expansion of morbidity hypothesis. J Aging Health 1991;3:194-216.
15.
Fries JF, Brice B, Chakravarty E: Compression of morbidity 1980-2011: a focused review of paradigms and progress. J Aging Res 2011;2011:261702.
16.
Crimmins EM, Beltrán-Sánchez H: Mortality and morbidity trends: is there compression of morbidity? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2011;66:75-86.
17.
Salomon AJ, Wang H, Freeman MK, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ: Healthy life expectancy for 187 countries, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2144-2162.
18.
King DE, Matheson E, Chirina S, Shankar A, Broman-Fulks J: The status of baby boomers' health in the United States: the healthiest generation? JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:385-386.
19.
Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, Seeman T, Verder E: Health, functioning, and disability in older adults - present status and future implications. Lancet 2015;385:563-575.
20.
Jagger C, Matthews FE, Wohland P, Fouweather T, Blossom CMS, Robinson L, Arthur A, Brayne C: A comparison of health expectancies over two decades in England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet 2016;387:779-786.
21.
Manton K, Gu XL: Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:6354-6359.
22.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health: Quality recommendation for ensuring good aging and improvement of services. Publications of Ministry of Social Affairs and Health 2013:11. Tampere, Suomen Yliopistopaino Oy, 2013.
23.
Salminen M, Vire J, Viikari L, Vahlberg T, Isoaho H, Lehtonen A, Viitanen M, Arve S, Eloranta S: Predictors of institutionalization among home-dwelling older Finnish people: a 22-year follow-up. Aging Clin Exp Res 2017;29:499-505.
24.
Rubenstein LZ, Robbins AS, Josephson KR, Schulman BL, Osterweil D: The value of assessing falls in an elderly population. A randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:308-316.
25.
Juva K, Sulkava R, Erkinjuntti T, Valvanne J, Tilvis R: Prevalence of dementia in the city of Helsinki. Acta Neurol Scand 1993;87:106-110.
26.
Spering CC, Hobson V, Lucas JA, Menon CV, Hall JR, O'Bryant SE: Diagnostic accuracy of the MMSE in detecting probable and possible Alzheimer's disease in ethnically diverse highly educated individuals: an analysis of the NACC database. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67:890-896.
27.
Bahat G, Tufan F, Saka B, Akin S, Ozkaya H, Yucel N, Erten N, Karan MA: Which body mass index (BMI) is better in the elderly for functional status? Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2012;54:78-81.
28.
Tinetti ME, Williams CS: Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1279-1284.
29.
Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Glynn RJ, Berkman LF, Blazer DG, Scherr PA, Wallace RB: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85-M94.
30.
Jylhä M, Volpato S, Guralnik JM: Self-rated health showed a graded association with frequently used biomarkers in a large population sample. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:465-471.
31.
Russell DW, Cutrona CE, de la Mora A, Wallace RB: Loneliness and nursing home admission among rural older adults. Psychol Aging 1997;12:574-589.
32.
Smith PC, Schmidt SM, Allensworth-Davies D, Saitz R: Primary care validation of a single-question alcohol screening test. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:783-788.
33.
Upmeier E, Vire J, Korhonen MJ, Isoaho H, Lehtonen A, Arve S, Wuorela M, Viitanen M: Cardiovascular risk profile and use of statins at the age of 70 years: a comparison of two Finnish birth cohorts born 20 years apart. Age Ageing 2016;45:84-90.
34.
Forma L, Aaltonen M, Pulkki J, Raitanen J, Rissanen P, Jylhä M: Long-term care is increasingly concentrated in the last years of life: a change from 2000 to 2011. Eur J Public Health 2017;27:665-669.
35.
Comas-Herrera A, Wittenberg R, Pickard L, Knapp M: Cognitive impairment in older people: future demand for long-term care services and the associated costs. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;22:1037-1045.
36.
Strandberg TE, Pitkälä KH, Tilvis RS, O'Neill D, Erkinjuntti TJ: Geriatric syndromes - vascular disorders? Ann Med 2013;45:265-273.
37.
Cigolle CT, Langa KM, Kabeto MU, Tian Z, Blaum CS: Geriatric conditions and disability: the Health and Retirement Study. Ann Intern Med 2007;147:156-164.
38.
Chen YM, Thompson EA: Understanding factors that influence success of home- and community-based services in keeping older adults in community settings. J Aging Health 2010;22:267-291.
39.
Kehusmaa S, Autti-Rämö I, Helenius H, Hinkka K, Valaste M, Rissanen P: Factors associated with the utilization and costs of health and social services in frail elderly patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:204.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.