Background: Cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) have deficits in sensory and motor skills leading to inappropriate proprioceptive feedback, impaired postural control, and fall risk. Balance training programs specifically developed for CIPN patients are lacking. Objective: This pilot study investigated the effect of an interactive motor adaptation balance training program based on wearable sensors for improving balance in older cancer patients with CIPN. Methods: Twenty-two patients (age: 70.3 ± 8.7 years) with objectively confirmed CIPN [vibration perception threshold (VPT) >25 V] were randomized to either an intervention (IG) or a control (CG) group. The IG received interactive game-based balance training including repetitive weight shifting and virtual obstacle crossing tasks. Wearable sensors provided real-time visual/auditory feedback from the lower limb trajectory and allowed the perception of motor errors during each motor action. The CG received no exercise intervention and continued their normal activity. Outcome measures were changes in sway of ankle, hip, and center of mass (CoM) in both mediolateral and anteroposterior (AP) directions during 30-second balance tests with increasing task difficulty [i.e. standing in feet-closed position with eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC), and in semi-tandem position with EO] at baseline and after the intervention. Additionally, gait performance (speed, variability) and fear of falling [Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)] were measured. Results: Training was safe despite the participants' impaired health status, great severity of CIPN (VPT 49.6 ± 26.7 V), and great fear of falling (FES-I score 31.37 ± 11.20). After the intervention, sway of hip, ankle, and CoM was significantly reduced in the IG compared to the CG while standing in feet-closed position with EO (p = 0.010-0.022, except AP CoM sway) and in semi-tandem position (p = 0.008-0.035, except ankle sway). No significant effects were found for balance with EC, gait speed, and FES-I score (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that older cancer patients with CIPN can significantly improve their postural balance with specifically tailored, sensor-based exercise training. The training approach has potential as a therapy for improving CIPN-related postural control deficits. However, future studies comparing the proposed technology-based training with traditional balance training are required to evaluate the benefit of the interactive joint movement feedback.

1.
Balducci L, Fossa SD: Rehabilitation of older cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2013;52:233-238.
2.
Giovanazzi-Bannon S, Rademaker A, Lai G, Benson AB 3rd: Treatment tolerance of elderly cancer patients entered onto phase II clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2447-2452.
3.
Wolf S, Barton D, Kottschade L, Grothey A, Loprinzi C: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: prevention and treatment strategies. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:1507-1515.
4.
du Bois A, Schlaich M, Lück HJ, Mollenkopf A, Wechsel U, Rauchholz M, Bauknecht T, Meerpohl HG: Evaluation of neurotoxicity induced by paclitaxel second-line chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 1999;7:354-361.
5.
Quasthoff S, Hartung HP: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Neurol 2002;249:9-17.
6.
Tofthagen C, Overcash J, Kip K: Falls in persons with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Support Care Cancer 2012;20:583-589.
7.
Hile ES, Fitzgerald GK, Studenski SA: Persistent mobility disability after neurotoxic chemotherapy. Phys Ther 2010;90:1649-1657.
8.
Niederer D, Schmidt K, Vogt L, Egen J, Klingler J, Hübscher M, Thiel C, Bernhörster M, Banzer W: Functional capacity and fear of falling in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Gait Posture 2014;39:865-869.
9.
Wampler MA, Topp KS, Miaskowski C, Byl NN, Rugo HS, Hamel K: Quantitative and clinical description of postural instability in women with breast cancer treated with taxane chemotherapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1002-1008.
10.
Horak FB, Dickstein R, Peterka RJ: Diabetic neuropathy and surface sway-referencing disrupt somatosensory information for postural stability in stance. Somatosens Mot Res 2002;19:316-326.
11.
Lord SR, Caplan GA, Colagiuri R, Colagiuri S, Ward JA: Sensori-motor function in older persons with diabetes. Diabet Med 1993;10:614-618.
12.
Najafi B, Horn D, Marclay S, Crews RT, Wu S, Wrobel JS: Assessing postural control and postural control strategy in diabetic patients using innovative and wearable technology. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:780-791.
13.
Richardson JK, Ashton-Miller JA, Lee SG, Jacobs K: Moderate peripheral neuropathy impairs weight transfer and unipedal balance in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:1152-1156.
14.
Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R: Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 2006;4:e179.
15.
Krakauer JW, Ghez C, Ghilardi MF: Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J Neurosci 2005;25:473-478.
16.
Krakauer JW, Ghilardi MF, Ghez C: Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:1026-1031.
17.
Visovsky C, Collins M, Abbott L, Aschenbrenner J, Hart C: Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2007;11:901-913.
18.
Grewal GS, Schwenk M, Lee-Eng J, Parvaneh S, Bharara M, Menzies R, Talal TK, Armstrong DG, Najafi B: Sensor-based interactive balance training with visual joint movement feedback for improving postural stability in diabetics with peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontology 2015;61:567-574.
19.
de Bruin ED, Schoene D, Pichierri G, Smith ST: Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Some theoretical considerations. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2010;43:229-234.
20.
van Diest M, Lamoth CJ, Stegenga J, Verkerke GJ, Postema K: Exergaming for balance training of elderly: state of the art and future developments. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:101.
21.
Grewal G, Sayeed R, Schwenk M, Bharara M, Menzies R, Talal T, Armstrong D, Najafi B: Balance rehabilitation: promoting the role of virtual reality in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2013;103:498-507.
22.
Schwenk M, Grewal GS, Honarvar B, Schwenk S, Mohler J, Khalsa DS, Najafi B: Interactive balance training integrating sensor-based visual feedback of movement performance: a pilot study in older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2014;11:164.
23.
Park SB, Goldstein D, Krishnan AV, Lin CSY, Friedlander ML, Cassidy J, Koltzenburg M, Kiernan MC: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: a critical analysis. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:419-437.
24.
Garrow AP, Boulton AJ: Vibration perception threshold - a valuable assessment of neural dysfunction in people with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2006;22:411-419.
25.
Wei LJ: A class of designs for sequential clinical trials. J Am Stat Assoc 1977;72:382-386.
26.
Grewal G, Sayeed R, Yeschek S, Menzies RA, Talal TK, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Najafi B: Virtualizing the assessment: a novel pragmatic paradigm to evaluate lower extremity joint perception in diabetes. Gerontology 2012;58:463-471.
27.
Sihvonen SE, Sipilä S, Era PA: Changes in postural balance in frail elderly women during a 4-week visual feedback training: a randomized controlled trial. Gerontology 2004;50:87-95.
28.
Young W, Ferguson S, Brault S, Craig C: Assessing and training standing balance in older adults: a novel approach using the ‘Nintendo Wii' balance board. Gait Posture 2011;33:303-305.
29.
Howe T, Rochester L, Neil F, Skelton D, Ballinger C: Exercise for improving balance in older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;11:CD004963.
30.
Lamoth CJ, Alingh R, Caljouw SR: Exergaming for elderly: effects of different types of game feedback on performance of a balance task. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;181:103-107.
31.
Zijlstra A, Mancini M, Chiari L, Zijlstra W: Biofeedback for training balance and mobility tasks in older populations: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:58.
32.
Shabbott BA, Sainburg RL: Learning a visuomotor rotation: simultaneous visual and proprioceptive information is crucial for visuomotor remapping. Exp Brain Res 2010;203:75-87.
33.
Bastian AJ: Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2008;21:628-633.
34.
Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM: Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001;94:149-158.
35.
Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M: Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1171-1178.
36.
Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C: Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 2005;34:614-619.
37.
Cofré Lizama LE, Pijnappels M, Faber GH, Reeves PN, Verschueren SM, van Dieën JH: Age effects on mediolateral balance control. PLoS One 2014;9:e110757.
38.
Maki BE, Holliday PJ, Topper AK: A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. J Gerontol 1994;49:M72-M84.
39.
Aminian K, Najafi B, Büla C, Leyvraz P-F, Robert P: Spatio-temporal parameters of gait measured by an ambulatory system using miniature gyroscopes. J Biomech 2002;35:689-699.
40.
Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA: A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1234-1238.
41.
Cohen J: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, Routledge, 1988.
42.
Delbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Lord SR: The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age Ageing 2010;39:210-216.
43.
Schwenk M, Howe C, Saleh A, Mohler J, Grewal G, Armstrong D, Najafi B: Frailty and technology: a systematic review of gait analysis in those with frailty. Gerontology 2014;60:79-89.
44.
Collins JJ, De Luca CJ: Open-loop and closed-loop control of posture: a random-walk analysis of center-of-pressure trajectories. Exp Brain Res 1993;95:308-318.
45.
Winter DA: Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 1995;3:193-214.
46.
Chou L-S, Kaufman KR, Hahn ME, Brey RH: Medio-lateral motion of the center of mass during obstacle crossing distinguishes elderly individuals with imbalance. Gait Posture 2003;18:125-133.
47.
Gerling KM, Schild J, Masuch M: Exergaming for elderly: analyzing player experience and performance; in Eibl M (ed): Mensch & Computer 2011: 11. fachübergreifende Konferenz für interaktive und kooperative Medien. München, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2011, p 401.
48.
Hanneton S, Varenne A: Coaching the Wii. Haptic, Audio Visual Environments and Games, 2009. HAVE 2009. Proc IEEE Int Workshop, Lecco, 2009, pp 54-57.
49.
Schwenk M, Zieschang T, Englert S, Grewal G, Najafi B, Hauer K: Improvements in gait characteristics after intensive resistance and functional training in people with dementia: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2014;14:73.
50.
Rose DJ, Clark S: Can the control of bodily orientation be significantly improved in a group of older adults with a history of falls? J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:275-282.
51.
Wall C 3rd: Application of vibrotactile feedback of body motion to improve rehabilitation in individuals with imbalance. J Neurol Phys Ther 2010;34:98-104.
52.
Legters K: Fear of falling. Phys Ther 2002;82:264-272.
53.
Dukyoo J, Juhee L, Lee SM: A meta-analysis of fear of falling treatment programs for the elderly. West J Nurs Res 2009;31:6-16.
54.
Chang HJ, Lynm C, Glass RM: JAMA patient page. Falls and older adults. JAMA 2010;303:288.
55.
Schwenk M, Lauenroth A, Stock C, Moreno RR, Oster P, McHugh G, Todd C, Hauer K: Definitions and methods of measuring and reporting on injurious falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:50.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.