Background: The economic impact of older-age cognitive impairment has been estimated primarily by the direct and indirect costs associated with dementia care. Other potential costs associated with milder cognitive impairment in the community have received little attention. Objective: To quantify the cost of nonclinical cognitive impairment in a large population-based sample in order to more fully inform cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions to maintain cognitive health. Methods: Volunteering by seniors has economic value but those with lower cognitive function may contribute fewer hours. Relations between hours volunteering and cognitive impairment were assessed using the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey data. These findings were extrapolated to the Australian population to estimate one potential cost attributable to nonclinical cognitive impairment. Results: In those aged ≥60 years in HILDA (n = 3,127), conservatively defined cognitive impairment was present in 3.8% of the sample. Impairment was defined by performance ≥1 standard deviation below the age- and education-adjusted mean on both the Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Backwards Digit Span test. In fully adjusted binomial regression models, impairment was associated with the probability of undertaking 1 h 9 min less volunteering a week compared to being nonimpaired (β = -1.15, 95% confidence interval -1.82 to -0.47, p = 0.001). In the population, 3.8% impairment equated to probable loss of AUD 302,307,969 per annum estimated by hours of volunteering valued by replacement cost. Conclusion: Nonclinical cognitive impairment in older age impacts upon on the nonmonetary economy via probable loss of volunteering contribution. Valuing loss of contribution provides additional information for cost-effectiveness evaluations of research and action directed toward maintaining older-age cognitive functioning.

1.
Norton S, Matthews F, Brayne C: A commentary on studies presenting projections of the future prevalence of dementia. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1.
2.
Hurd M, Martorell P, Delavande A, Mullen K, Langa K: Monetary costs of dementia in the United States. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1326-1334.
3.
Wimo A, Jönsson L, Bond J, Prince M, Winblad B: The worldwide economic impact of dementia 2010. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9:1-11.e3.
4.
Zhang Y, Kivipelto M, Solomon A, Wimo A: Cost-effectiveness of a health intervention program with risk reductions for getting demented: results of a Markov model in a Swedish/Finnish setting. J Alzheimers Dis 2011;26:735-744.
5.
Versijpt J: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2014;42(suppl 3):S19-S25.
6.
Knapp M, Iemmi V, Romeo R: Dementia care costs and outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;28:551-561.
7.
Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O, Szoeke C, Macaulay SL, Martins R, Maruff P, Ames D, Rowe CC, Masters CL: Amyloid β deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:357-367.
8.
Mistridis P, Krumm S, Monsch AU, Berres M, Taylor K: The 12 years preceding mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: the temporal emergence of cognitive decline. J Alzheimers Dis 2015;48:1095-1107.
9.
Rajan KB, Wilson RS, Weuve J, Barnes LL, Evans DA: Cognitive impairment 18 years before clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer disease dementia. Neurology 2015;85:898-904.
10.
Salamon L, Sokolowski S, Haddock M: Measuring the economic value of volunteering globally: Concepts, estimates and a roadmap for the future. Ann Publ Cooper Econ 2011;82:217-252.
11.
Ironmonger D: Household production; in Baltes N, Smelser P (eds): International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford, Pergamon, 2011, pp 6934-6939.
12.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian National Accounts: Non-Profit Institutions Satellite Account. Canberra, Australian Government, 2012-2013.
13.
Anderson N, Damianakis T, Kroger E, Wagner L, Dawson D, Binns M, Bernstein S, Caspi E, Cook S: The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: a critical review and recommendations for future research. Psychol Bull 2014;140:1505-1533.
14.
Nelson HE: National Adult Reading Test (NART). Windsor, NFER-Nelson, 1982.
15.
Smith A: Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Los Angeles, Western Psychological Services, 1982.
16.
Wechsler D: The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins Corporation, 1944.
17.
Wooden M: The Development of Cognitive Ability Measures in the HILDA Survey. HILDA Project Technical Paper Series. Melbourne, University of Melbourne, 2012.
18.
Wooden M: The Measurement of Cognitive Ability in Wave 12 of the HILDA Survey. Melbourne, University of Melbourne, 2013, pp 1-34.
19.
Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Health Survey: Updated Results. Canberra, Australian Government, 2011-2012, 2013.
20.
Watson N: Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Weighting Methodology for the HILDA Survey. HILDA Project Technical Paper Series. Melbourne, University of Melbourne 2012.
21.
Binder LM, Iverson GL, Brooks BL: To err is human: ‘abnormal' neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2009;24:31-46.
22.
IBM Corporation: IBM Statistics for Windows, version 22. Armonk, IBM Corporation, 2013
23.
Watson N, Wooden M: The HILDA Survey: a case study in the design and development of a successful household panel study. Longit Life Course Stud 2012;3:369-381.
25.
Prince M, Bryce R, Ferri C: World Alzheimer's Report 2011: The Benefits of Early Diagnosis and Intervention. London, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, 2011.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.