The interplay of cognitive abilities that constitute the process of ‘remembering to remember' is referred to as prospective memory. Prospective memory is an essential ability to meet everyday life challenges across the life span, constitutes a key element of autonomy and independence and is especially important in old age with increasing social and health-related prospective memory demands. The present paper first presents major findings from the current state of the art in research on age effects in prospective memory. In a second part, it presents four focus areas for future research outlining possible conceptual, methodological, and neuroscientific advancements.

Keywords:
Cognition, Memory, Daily life, Prospective memory , Everyday memory, Multiprocess theory, Emotion, Intraindividual variability, Electroencephalogram
1.
Cohen G: Memory in the Real World. Hove, Psychology Press, 1996, p 54.
2.
Ellis J, Kvavilashvili L: Prospective memory in 2000. Past, present and future directions. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000;14:S1-S9.
3.
Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO: Prospective Memory. Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives. New York, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2008.
4.
McDaniel MA, Einstein GO: Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field. Thousand Oaks, Sage, 2007.
5.
Crovitz HF, Daniel WF: Measurements of everyday memory: toward the prevention of forgetting. Bull Psychonomic Soc 1984;22:413-414.
6.
Woods SP, Weinborn M, Velnoweth A, Rooney A, Bucks RS: Memory for intentions is uniquely associated with instrumental activities of daily living in healthy older adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2012;18:134-138.
7.
Kliegel M, Jäger T, Altgassen M, Shum D: Clinical neuropsychology of prospective memory; in Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (eds): Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 2008, pp 283-308.
8.
Kliegel M, Altgassen M, Hering A, Rose NS: A process-model based approach to prospective memory impairment in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia 2011;49:2166-2177.
9.
Smith G, Della Sala S, Logie RH, Maylor EA: Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: a questionnaire study. Memory 2000;8:311-321.
10.
Craik FIM: A functional account of age differences in memory; in Klix F, Hagendorf H (eds): Human Memory and Cognitive Capabilities. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1986, pp 409-422.
11.
Maylor EA: Prospective memory in normal ageing and dementia. Neurocase 1995;1:285-289.
12.
McDaniel MA, Einstein GO: Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000;14:S127-S144.
13.
Henry JD, MacLeod MS, Phillips LH, Crawford JR: A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychol Aging 2004;19:27-39.
14.
Maylor EA: Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. Psychol Aging 1996;11:74-78.
15.
Park DC, Hertzog C, Kidder DP, Morrell RW, Mayhorn CB: Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychol Aging 1997;12:314-327.
16.
Einstein GO, McDaniel MA: Normal aging and prospective memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990;16:717-726.
17.
McDaniel MA, Einstein GO, Rendell PG: The puzzle of inconsistent age-related declines in prospective memory: a multiprocess explanation; in Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (eds): Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives. Mahwah, Erlbaum, 2008, pp 141-160.
18.
Rendell PG, Craik FIM: Virtual week and actual week: age-related differences in prospective memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 2000;14:S43-S62.
19.
Schnitzspahn KM, Ihle A, Henry JD, Rendell PG, Kliegel M: The age-prospective memory-paradox: a comprehensive exploration of possible mechanisms. Int Psychogeriatr 2011;23:583-592.
20.
Schnitzspahn KM, Stahl C, Zeintl M, Kaller CP, Kliegel M: The role of shifting updating and inhibition in prospective memory performance in young and older adults. Dev Psychol 2013;49:1544-1553.
21.
Einstein GO, McDaniel MA: Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005;14:286-290.
22.
Kliegel M, Jäger T, Phillips L: Adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: a metaanalysis on the role of focal versus nonfocal cues. Psychol Aging 2008;23:203-208.
23.
Ihle A, Hering A, Mahy CEV, Bisiacchi PS, Kliegel M: Adult age differences, response management, and cue focality in event-based prospective memory: a meta-analysis on the role of task order specificity. Psychol Aging 2013;28:714-720.
24.
Scullin M, McDaniel MA, Shelton J: The dynamic multiprocess framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability. Cogn Psychol 2013;67:55-71.
25.
May CP, Manning M, Einstein GO, Becker L, Owens M: The best of both worlds: Emotional cues improve prospective memory execution and reduce repetition errors. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2015;22:357-375.
26.
Schnitzspahn KM, Horn S, Bayen U, Kliegel M: Age effects in emotional prospective memory: cue valence differentially affects the prospective and retrospective component. Psychol Aging 2012;27:498-509.
27.
Schnitzspahn KM, Thorley C, Phillips LE, Voigt B, Threadgold E, Hammond ER, Mustafa B, Kliegel M: Mood impairs time-based prospective memory in young but not older adults: the mediating role of attentional control. Psychol Aging 2014;29:264-270.
28.
Aberle I, Rendell PG, Rose NS, McDaniel MA, Kliegel M: The age prospective memory paradox: young adults may not give their best outside of the lab. Dev Psychol 2010;46:1444-1453.
29.
Bunce D, MacDonald SWS, Hultsch DF: Inconsistency in serial choice decision and motor reaction times dissociate in younger and older adults. Brain Cogn 2004;56:320-327.
30.
Horn SS, Bayen UJ, Smith RE: What can the diffusion model tell us about prospective memory? Can J Exp Psychol 2011;65:69-75.
31.
Boywitt CD, Rummel J: A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory. Mem Cognit 2012;40:70-82.
32.
Loft S, Bowden VK, Ball BH, Brewer GA: Fitting an ex-Gaussian function to examine costs in event-based prospective memory: evidence for a continuous monitoring profile. Acta Psychol 2014;152:177-182.
33.
Horn SS, Bayen UJ: Modeling criterion shifts and target checking in prospective memory monitoring. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2015;41:95-117.
34.
Horn SS, Bayen UJ, Smith RE: Adult age differences in interference from a prospective-memory task: a diffusion model analysis. Psychon Bull Rev 2013;20:1266-1273.
35.
Beck SM, Ruge H, Walser M, Goschke T: The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia 2014;52:37-50.
36.
Benoit RG, Gilbert SJ, Frith CD, Burgess PW: Rostral prefrontal cortex and the focus of attention in prospective memory. Cerebr Cortex 2012;22:1876-1886.
37.
Burgess PW, Dumontheil I, Gilbert SJ: The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends Cogn Sci 2007;11:290-298.
38.
Burgess PW, Quayle A, Frith CD: Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography. Neuropsychologia 2001;39:545-555.
39.
Burgess PW, Scott SK, Frith CD: The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:906-918.
40.
Gonneaud J, Rauchs G, Groussard M, Landeau B, Mezenge F, de La Sayette V, Eustache F, Desgranges B: How do we process event-based and time-based intentions in the brain? An fMRI study of prospective memory in healthy individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:3066-3082.
41.
Okuda J, Fujii T, Yamadori A, Kawashima R, Tsukiura T, Fukatsu R, Suzuki K, Ito M, Fukuda H: Participation of the prefrontal cortices in prospective memory: evidence from a PET study in humans. Neurosci Lett 1998;253:127-130.
42.
Burgess PW, Gonen-Yaacovi G, Volle E: Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia 2011;49:2246-2257.
43.
Cona G, Scarpazza C, Sartori G, Moscovitch M, Bisiacchi PS: Neural bases of prospective memory: a meta-analysis and the ‘Attention to Delayed Intention' (AtoDI) model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2015;52:21-37.
44.
Park DC, Reuter-Lorenz P: The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol 2009;60:173-196.
45.
West R: The temporal dynamics of prospective memory: a review of the ERP and prospective memory literature. Neuropsychologia 2011;49:2233-2245.
46.
Bisiacchi PS, Schiff S, Ciccola A, Kliegel M: The role of dual-task and task-switch in prospective memory: behavioural data and neural correlates. Neuropsychologia 2009;47:1362-1373.
47.
West R, Bowry R, Krompinger J: The effects of working memory demands on the neural correlates of prospective memory. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:197-207.
48.
Zöllig J, West R, Martin M, Altgassen M, Lemke U, Kliegel M: Neural correlates of prospective memory across the lifespan. Neuropsychologia 2007;45:3299-3314.
49.
West R, Herndon RW, Covell E: Neural correlates of age-related declines in the formation and realization of delayed intentions. Psychol Aging 2003;18:461-473.
50.
Zöllig J, Martin M, Kliegel M: Forming intentions successfully: differential compensational mechanisms of adolescents and old adults. Cortex 2010;46:575-589.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.