Background: Lifespan psychological and life course sociological perspectives indicate that individual development is shaped by social and historical circumstances. Increases in fluid cognitive performance over the last century are well documented and researchers have begun examining historical trends in personality and subjective well-being in old age. Relatively less is known about secular changes in other key components of psychosocial function among older adults. Objective: In the present study, we examined cohort differences in key components of psychosocial function, including subjective age, control beliefs, and perceived social integration, as indicated by loneliness and availability of very close others. Methods: We compared data obtained 20 years apart in the Berlin Aging Study (in 1990-1993) and the Berlin Aging Study II (in 2013-2014) and identified case-matched cohort groups based on age, gender, cohort-normed education, and marital or partner status (n = 153 in each cohort, mean age = 75 years). In follow-up analyses, we controlled for having lived in former East versus West Germany, physical diseases, cohort-normed household income, cognitive performance, and the presence of a religious affiliation. Results: Consistently across analyses, we found that, relative to the earlier-born BASE cohort (year of birth: mean = 1916; SD = 3.38 years; range = 1901-1922), participants in the BASE-II sample (year of birth: mean = 1939; SD = 3.22 years; range = 1925-1949) reported lower levels of external control beliefs (d = -1.01) and loneliness (d = -0.63). Cohorts did not differ in subjective age, availability of very close others, and internal control beliefs. Conclusion: Taken together, our findings suggest that some aspects of psychosocial function of older adults have improved across the two recent decades. We discuss the possible role of sociocultural factors that might have led to the observed set of cohort differences.

1.
Ryder NB: The cohort as a concept in the study of social changes. Am Sociological Rev 1965;30:843-861.
2.
Schaie KW: A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychol Bull 1965;64:92-107.
3.
Flynn JR: Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: what IQ tests really measure. Psychol Bull 1987;101:171-191.
4.
Twenge JM: The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952-1993. J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;79:1007-1021.
5.
Gerstorf D, Hülür G, Drewelies J, Eibich P, Duezel S, Demuth I, et al: Secular changes in late-life cognition and well-being: towards a long bright future with a short brisk ending? Psychol Aging 2015;30:301-310.
6.
Hülür G, Ram N, Gerstorf D: Historical improvements in well-being do not hold in late life: Studies in national samples from the US and Germany. Dev Psychol 2015;51:998-1012.
7.
Schilling OK: Cohort- and age-related decline in elder's life satisfaction: is there really a paradox? Eur J Aging 2005;2:254-263.
8.
Sutin AR, Terracciano A, Milaneschi Y, An Y, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB: Cohort effect on well-being: the legacy of economic hard times. Psychol Sci 2013;24:379-385.
9.
Weiss D, Lang FR: ‘They' are old but ‘I' feel younger: age-group dissociation as a self-protective strategy in old age. Psychol Aging 2012;27:153-163.
10.
Kotter-Grühn D: Changing negative views of aging: implications for intervention and translational research; in Diehl M, Wahl H-W (eds): Research on Subjective Aging: New Developments and Future Directions. New York, Springer, 2014, pp 167-186.
11.
Lachman ME, Neupert SD, Agrigoroaei S: The relevance of control beliefs for health and aging; in Schaie KW, Willis SL (eds): Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. New York, Elsevier, 2011, pp 175-190.
12.
Rotter JB: Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 1966;80:1-28.
13.
Cribier F: Changes in the experiences of life between two cohorts of Parisian pensioners, born in circa 1907 and 1921. Ageing Soc 2005;25:637-654.
14.
Schaie KW, Willis SL, Pennak S: An historical framework for cohort differences in intelligence. Res Hum Dev 2005;2:43-67.
15.
Crimmins EM, Beltrán-Sánchez H: Mortality and morbidity trends: is there compression of morbidity? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2011;66:P75-P86.
16.
Fiori KL, Brown EE, Cortina KS, Antonucci TC: Locus of control as a mediator of the relationship between religiosity and life satisfaction: age, race, and gender differences. Ment Health Relig Cult 2006;9:239-263.
17.
Wolf C: How secularized is Germany? Cohort and comparative perspectives. Soc Compass 2008;55:111-126.
18.
Suanet B, van Tilburg TG, Broese van Groenou MI: Nonkin in older adults' personal networks: more important among later cohorts? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2013;68:633-643.
19.
Vaupel JW: Biodemography of human ageing. Nat 2010;464:536-542.
20.
Coffman DL: Estimating causal effects in mediation analysis using propensity scores. Struct Equ Modeling 2011;18:357-369.
21.
Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds): The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
22.
Bertram L, Böckenhoff A, Demuth I, Duezel S, Eckardt R, Li S-C, et al: Cohort profile: The Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). Int J Epidemiol 2014;43:703-712.
23.
Lindenberger U, Gilberg, R, Little TD, Nuthmann, R, Pötter, U, Baltes, PB: Sample selectivity and generalizability of the results of the Berlin Aging Study; in Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds): The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp 56-82.
24.
Kunzmann U, Little TD, Smith J: Perceiving control: a double-edged sword in old age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:P484-P491.
25.
Russell D, Cutrona CE, Rose J, Yurko K: Social and emotional loneliness: an examination of Weiss's typology of loneliness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;46:1313-1321.
26.
Antonucci TC: Hierarchical mapping technique. Generations 1986;10:10-12.
27.
Headey B, Muffels R, Wagner GG: Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:17922-17926.
28.
Eibich P, Krekel C, Demuth I, Wagner GG: Associations between neighbourhood characteristics, well-being and health vary over the life course. Gerontology 2016;62:362-370.
29.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-383.
30.
Wechsler D: Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York, Psychological Corporation, 1955.
31.
Stephan Y, Caudroit J, Jaconelli A, Terracciano A: Subjective age and cognitive functioning: a 10-year prospective study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014;22:1180-1187.
32.
Ng R, Allore HG, Trentalange M, Monin JK, Levy BR: Increasing negativity of age stereotypes across 200 years: evidence from a database of 400 million words. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117086.
33.
van Tilburg TG, Aartsen MJ, van der Pas S: Loneliness after divorce: a cohort comparison among Dutch young-old adults. Eur Sociol Rev 2015;31:243-252.
34.
Thornton A, Young-DeMarco L: Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: the 1960s through the 1990s. J Marriage Fam 2001;63:1009-1037.
35.
Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M: Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput Hum Behav 2010;26:870-882.
36.
Choi M, Kong S, Jung D: Computer and Internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: a meta-analysis. Healthc Inform Res 2012;18:191-198.
37.
Baltes PB, Staudinger UM, Lindenberger U: Lifespan psychology: theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annu Rev Psychol 1999;50:471-507.
38.
Suzman RM, Manton KG, Willis DP: Introducing the oldest old; in Suzman RM, Willis DP, Manton KG (eds): The Oldest Old. New York, Oxford University Press, 1992, pp 3-14.
39.
Gerstorf D, Ram N, Hoppmann CA, Willis SL, Schaie KW: Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. Dev Psychol 2011;47:1026-1041.
40.
Hülür G, Infurna FJ, Ram N, Gerstorf D: Cohorts based on decade of death: no evidence for secular trends favoring later cohorts in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the AHEAD study. Psychol Aging 2013;28:115-127.
41.
Luong G, Charles ST, Rook KS, Reynolds CA, Gatz M: Age differences and longitudinal change in the effects of data collection mode on self-reports of psychosocial functioning. Psychol Aging 2015;30:106-119.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.