Background: Although stereotype threat is a well-documented phenomenon, previous studies examining it in older adults have almost exclusively focused on objective cognitive outcomes. Considerably less attention has been paid to the impact of stereotype threat on older adults' subjective assessments of their own abilities or to the impact of stereotype threat in noncognitive domains. Objective: Older adults are stereotyped as having experienced not only cognitive declines, but physical declines as well. The current study tested the prediction that stereotype threat can negatively influence older adults' subjective hearing abilities. Methods: To test this, 115 adults (mean age 50.03 years, range 41-67) read either a positive or negative description about how aging affects hearing. All participants then answered a questionnaire in which they assessed their own hearing abilities. Results: The impact of stereotype threat on self-reported hearing was moderated by chronological age. Participants in their 40s and early 50s were unaffected by the stereotype threat manipulation. In contrast, participants in their late 50s and 60s rated their hearing as being subjectively worse when under stereotype threat. Conclusion: The current study provides a clear demonstration that stereotype threat negatively impacts older adults' subjective assessments of their own abilities. It is also the first study to demonstrate an effect of stereotype threat within the domain of hearing. These results have important implications for researchers investigating age-related hearing decline. Stereotype threat can lead to overestimation of the prevalence of age-related hearing decline. It can also serve as a confounding variable when examining the psychosocial correlates of hearing loss. Because of this, researchers studying age-related hearing loss should aim to provide a stereotype threat-free testing environment and also include assessments of stereotype threat within their studies.

Keywords:
Old age, Stereotype threat, Hearing loss, Hearing impairment, Ageism
1.
Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L: Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1851-1853.
2.
Bainbridge KE, Wallhagen MI: Hearing loss in an aging American population: extent, impact, and management. Annu Rev Public Health 2014;35:1-39.
3.
Levy BR, Slade MD, Gill TM: Hearing decline predicted by elders' stereotypes. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:82-87.
4.
Steele CM: A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am Psychol 1997;52:613-629.
5.
Barber SJ, Mather M: Stereotype threat in older adults: when and why does it occur, and who is most affected?; in Verhaeghen P, Hertzog C (eds): The Oxford Handbook of Emotion, Social Cognition, and Problem Solving during Adulthood. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp 302-320.
6.
Hess TM, Hinson JT: Age-related variation in the influences of aging stereotypes on memory in adulthood. Psychol Aging 2006;21:621-625.
7.
Schmader T: Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. J Exp Soc Psychol 2002;38:194-201.
8.
Hess TM, Hinson JT, Hodges EA: Moderators and mechanisms underlying stereotype threat effects on older adults' memory performance. Exp Aging Res 2009;35:153-177.
9.
Bouazzaoui B, Follenfant A, Ric F, Fay S, Croizet J, Atzeni T, Taconnat L: Ageing-related stereotypes in memory: when the beliefs come true. Memory 2015, Epub ahead of print.
10.
Coudin G, Alexopoulos T: ‘Help me! I'm old!' How negative aging stereotypes create dependency among older adults. Aging Ment Health 2010;14:516-523.
11.
Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD: Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 2011;6:3-5.
12.
Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG: Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgm Decis Making 2010;5:411-419.
13.
Ventry IM, Weinstein BE: Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. ASHA 1983;25:37-47.
14.
Gatehouse S, Noble W: The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 2004;43:85-99.
15.
Brown JI, Fishco VV, Hanna GS: Nelson-Denny Reading Test, Forms G and H. Itasca, Riverside, 1993.
16.
Hayes AF: PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication, 2012.
17.
Palmore E: The ageism survey first findings. Gerontologist 2001;41:572-575.
18.
Kiely KM, Gopinath B, Mitchell P, Browning CJ, Anstey KJ: Evaluating a dichotomized measure of self-reported hearing loss against gold standard audiometry: prevalence estimates and age bias in a pooled national data set. J Aging Health 2012;24:439-458.
19.
Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA: Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes. Ear Hear 2007;28:141-162.
20.
Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Kuik D, Deeg DJH: The association of hearing impairment and chronic diseases with psychosocial health status in older age. J Aging Health 2002;14:122-137.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.