Background: In terms of motivation and long-term adherence, low-resistance exercise might be more suitable for older adults than high-resistance exercise. However, more data are needed to support this claim. Objective: The objective was to investigate the effect of low- and high-resistance exercise protocols on long-term adherence and motivation. Methods: This study was designed as an exploratory 24-week follow-up of a randomized 12-week resistance training intervention in older adults. Participants were free to decide whether or not they continued resistance training at their own expense following the intervention. Fifty-six older adults were randomly assigned to HIGH [2 × 10-15 repetitions at 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM)], LOW (1 × 80-100 repetitions at 20% of 1RM), or LOW+ (1 × 60 repetitions at 20% of 1RM + 1 × 10-20 repetitions at 40% 1RM). Motivation, self-efficacy and the perceived barriers for continuing resistance exercise were measured after cessation of each supervised intervention and at follow-up, while long-term adherence was probed retrospectively at follow-up. Results: Participants reported high levels of self-determined motivation before, during, and after the supervised intervention, with no differences between groups (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, only few participants continued strength training after the intervention: 17% in HIGH, 21% in LOW+, and 11% in LOW (p > 0.05). The most commonly reported barriers for continuing resistance exercise were perceived lack of time (46%), being more interested in other physical activities (40%), seasonal reasons (40%), and financial cost (28%). Conclusion: The results suggest no difference in long-term adherence after the end of a supervised exercise intervention at high or low external resistances. Long-term adherence was limited despite high levels of self-determined motivation during the interventions. These findings highlight the importance of further research on developing strategies to overcome barriers of older adults to adhere to resistance exercise without supervision.

1.
Abellan van Kan G: Epidemiology and consequences of sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:708-712.
2.
Marcell TJ: Sarcopenia: causes, consequences, and preventions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:M911-M916.
3.
American College of Sports Medicine: ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, ed 9. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013.
4.
Taaffe DR, Pruitt L, Pyka G, Guido D, Marcus R: Comparative effects of high- and low-intensity resistance training on thigh muscle strength, fiber area, and tissue composition in elderly women. Clin Physiol 1996;16:381-392.
5.
Van Roie E, Delecluse C, Coudyzer W, Boonen S, Bautmans I: Strength training at high versus low external resistance in older adults: effects on muscle volume, muscle strength, and force-velocity characteristics. Exp Gerontol 2013;48:1351-1361.
6.
Deci EL, Ryan RM: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, Plenum, 1985.
7.
Ryan RM, Deci EL: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 2000;55:68-78.
8.
Seghers J, Van Hoecke AS, Schotte A, Opdenacker J, Boen F: The added value of a brief self-efficacy coaching on the effectiveness of a 12-week physical activity program. J Phys Act Health 2014;11:18-29.
9.
Bandura A: Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, Worth Publishers, 1997.
10.
Barbeau A, Sweet SN, Fortier MS: A path-analytic model of self-determination theory in a physical activity context. J Appl Biobehav Res 2009;14:103-118.
11.
Chatzisarantis NL, Hagger MS: Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation. Psychol Health 2009;24:29-48.
12.
Wilson PM, Rodgers WM, Blanchard CM, Gessel J: The relationship between psychological needs, self-determined motivation, exercise attitudes, and physical fitness. J Appl Soc Psychol 2003;33:2373-2392.
13.
Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R: Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychol Health 2005;20:143-160.
14.
McAuley E, Jerome GJ, Elavsky S, Marquez DX, Ramsey SN: Predicting long-term maintenance of physical activity in older adults. Prev Med 2003;37:110-118.
15.
Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ: The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med 2011;41:641-671.
16.
Mathews AE, Laditka SB, Laditka JN, Wilcox S, Corwin SJ, Liu R, Friedman DB, Hunter R, Tseng W, Logsdon RG: Older adults' perceived physical activity enablers and barriers: a multicultural perspective. J Aging Phys Act 2010;18:119-140.
17.
Baert V, Gorus E, Mets T, Geerts C, Bautmans I: Motivators and barriers for physical activity in the oldest old: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:464-474.
18.
Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, Lenz B, Dixon C, Timmer J, Frazee K, Dube J, Andreacci J: Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:333-341.
19.
Opdenacker J, Boen F, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vanden Auweele Y: Explaining the psychological effects of a sustainable lifestyle physical activity intervention among rural women. Ment Health Phys Act 2008;1:74-81.
20.
Markland D, Tobin VJ: A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2004;26:191-196.
21.
Picorelli AMA, Pereira DS, Felicio DC, Dos Anjos DM, Pereira DA, Dias RC, Assis MG, Pereira LS: Adherence of older women with strength training and aerobic exercise. Clin Interv Aging 2014;9:323-331.
22.
Schutzer KA, Graves BS: Barriers and motivations to exercise in older adults. Prev Med 2004;39:1056-1061.
23.
Schuler PB, Roy JLP, Vinci D, Philipp SF, Cohen SJ: Barriers and motivations to exercise in older African American and European American women. Calif J Health Promot 2006;4:128-134.
24.
Cohen-Mansfield J, Marx MS, Guralnik JM: Motivators and barriers to exercise in an older community-dwelling population. J Aging Phys Act 2003;11:242-253.
25.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K: An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988;15:351-377.
26.
World Health Organization: Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241599979_eng.pdf (accessed February 1, 2015).
27.
Kennis E, Verschueren SM, Bogaerts A, Coudyzer W, Boonen S, Delecluse C: Effects of fitness and vibration training on muscle quality: a 1-year postintervention follow-up in older men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:910-918.
28.
Motl RW, McAuley E, DiStefano C: Is social desirability associated with self-reported physical activity? Prev Med 2005;40:735-739.
29.
Trappe S, Williamson D, Godard M: Maintenance of whole muscle strength and size following resistance training in older men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57:B138-B143.
30.
Elsangedy HM, Krause MP, Krinski K, Alves RC, Hsin Nery CC, da Silva SG: Is the self-selected resistance exercise intensity by older women consistent with the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines to improve muscular fitness? J Strength Cond Res 2013;27:1877-1884.
31.
Focht BC: Perceived exertion and training load during self-selected and imposed-intensity resistance exercise in untrained women. J Strength Cond Res 2007;21:183-187.
32.
Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Rodrigues R, Borges MK, Jinha A, Herzog W, Vaz MA: Functional and morphological adaptations to aging in knee extensor muscles of physically active men. J Appl Biomech 2013;29:535-542.
33.
Frankel JE, Bean JF, Frontera WR: Exercise in the elderly: research and clinical practice. Clin Geriatr Med 2006;22:239-256.
34.
Kennis E, Verschueren SM, Bogaerts A, Van RE, Boonen S, Delecluse C: Long-term impact of strength training on muscle strength characteristics in older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:2054-2060.
35.
Visvanathan R, Chapman I: Preventing sarcopaenia in older people. Maturitas 2010;66:383-388.
36.
Kruger J, Carlson SA, Kohl HW III: Fitness facilities for adults: differences in perceived access and usage. Am J Prev Med 2007;32:500-505.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.