Background: A consensus on the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia, a common syndrome in the elderly, has not been reached yet. Prevalence rates vary between studies due to the use of different criteria encompassing different measures, correction factors and cutoff points. Objective: This study compared prevalence rates of sarcopenia using nine sets of diagnostic criteria applied in two different elderly populations. Methods: The study population encompassed 308 healthy elderly participants (152 males, 156 females; mean age 74 years) and 123 geriatric outpatients (54 males, 69 females; mean age 81 years). Diagnostic criteria included relative muscle mass, absolute muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance. Results: Prevalence rates of sarcopenia varied between 0 and 15% in healthy elderly participants and between 2 and 34% in geriatric outpatients. Conclusion: This study clearly demonstrates the dependency of sarcopenia prevalence rates on the applied diagnostic criteria.

1.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Topinkova E, Michel J-P: Understanding sarcopenia as a geriatric syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010;13:1-7.
2.
Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, Garry PJ, Lindeman RD: Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:755-763.
3.
Bunout D, de la Maza MP, Barrera G, Leiva L, Hirsch S: Association between sarcopenia and mortality in healthy older people. Australas J Ageing 2011;30:89-92.
4.
Malafarina V, Úriz-Otano F, Iniesta R, Gil-Guerrero L: Sarcopenia in the elderly: diagnosis, physiopathology and treatment. Maturitas 2012;71:109-114.
5.
Vandewoude MF, Alish CJ, Sauer AC, Hegazi RA: Malnutrition-sarcopenia syndrome: is this the future of nutrition screening and assessment for older adults? J Aging Res 2012;2012:651570.
6.
Bijlsma AY, Pasma JH, Lambers D, Stijntjes M, Blauw GJ, Meskers CG, Maier AB: Muscle strength rather than muscle mass is associated with standing balance in elderly outpatients. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2013;14:493-498.
7.
Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Lee JS, Visser M, Nevitt M, Kritchevsky SB, Tylavsky FA, Newman AB: Alternative definitions of sarcopenia, lower extremity performance, and functional impairment with aging in older men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:769-774.
8.
Kelly TL, Wilson KE, Heymsfield SB: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition reference values from NHANES. PLoS One 2009;4:e7038.
9.
Janssen I, Baumgartner RN, Ross R, Rosenberg IH, Roubenoff R: Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:413-421.
10.
Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R: Low relative skeletal muscle mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:889-896.
11.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel J-P, Rolland Y, Schneider SM: Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010;39:412-423.
12.
Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Fragala MS, Kenny AM: The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:547-558.
13.
Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, Bhasin S, Morley JE, Newman AB, Abellan van Kan G, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Breuille D: Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2011;12:249-256.
14.
Bijlsma A, Meskers C, Ling C, Narici M, Kurrle S, Cameron I, Westendorp R, Maier A: Defining sarcopenia: the impact of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of sarcopenia in a large middle aged cohort. Age 2013;35:871-881.
15.
McPhee JS, Hogrel J-Y, Maier AB, Seppet E, Seynnes OR, Sipilä S, Bottinelli R, Barnouin Y, Bijlsma AY, Gapeyeva H: Physiological and functional evaluation of healthy young and older men and women: design of the European MyoAge study. Biogerontology 2013;14:325-337.
16.
Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S, Bartali B, Cavazzini C, Di Iorio A, Corsi AM, Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L: Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 2003;95:1851-1860.
17.
Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, Meinow B, Fratiglioni L: Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10:430-439.
18.
Ling CH, de Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, Gunn DA, Stokkel MP, Westendorp RG, Maier AB: Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr 2011;30:610-615.
19.
Ressler S, Bartkova J, Niederegger H, Bartek J, Scharffetter-Kochanek K, Jansen-Dürr P, Wlaschek M: p16INK4A is a robust in vivo biomarker of cellular aging in human skin. Aging Cell 2006;5:379-389.
20.
Pasma JH, Stijntjes M, Ou SS, Blauw GJ, Meskers CG, Maier AB: Walking speed in elderly outpatients depends on the assessment method. Age 2014;36:9736.
21.
Dam T-T, Peters KW, Fragala M, Cawthon PM, Harris TB, McLean R, Shardell M, Alley DE, Kenny A, Ferrucci L: An evidence-based comparison of operational criteria for the presence of sarcopenia. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69:584-590.
22.
Bijlsma A, Meskers C, van den Eshof N, Westendorp R, Sipilä S, Stenroth L, Sillanpää E, McPhee J, Jones D, Narici M: Diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia and physical performance. Age 2014;36:275-285.
23.
Bijlsma A, Meskers C, van Heemst D, Westendorp R, de Craen A, Maier A: Diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia relate differently to insulin resistance. Age 2013;35:2367-2375.
24.
Bijlsma A, Meskers M, Molendijk M, Westendorp R, Sipilä S, Stenroth L, Sillanpää E, McPhee J, Jones D, Narici M: Diagnostic measures for sarcopenia and bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2013;24:2681-2691.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.