Abstract
Background: While the negative effects of spousal bereavement on well-being are well documented in empirical research, the large individual differences in psychological adaptation are still not well understood. Objective: This contribution aims to identify patterns of psychological adaptation to spousal loss in old age and to shed light on the role of intra- and interpersonal resources and contextual factors as discriminant variables among these patterns. Methods: The data stem from a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 402 widowed individuals (228 women, 174 men) aged between 60 and 89 years (mean age 74.41 years), who lost their partner within the last 5 years, and 618 married individuals, who served as controls (312 women, 306 men; mean age 73.82 years). Results: The exploratory latent profile analysis of the well-being outcomes of depressive symptoms, hopelessness, loneliness, life satisfaction and subjective health revealed three different groups in the widowed sample: ‘resilients' (54% of the sample), ‘copers' (39%) and ‘vulnerables' (7%). The most important variables for group allocation were intrapersonal resources - psychological resilience and the Big Five personality traits - but also the quality of the former relationship and how the loss was experienced. Conclusion: Successful adaptation to spousal loss is primarily associated with high scores in psychological resilience and extraversion and low scores in neuroticism. Our results shed light on the variability in psychological adaptation and underline the important role of intrapersonal resources in facing spousal loss in old age.
Journal Section:
Editor's choice
References
1.
Clark AE, Georgellis Y: Back to baseline in Britain: adaptation in the British household panel survey. Economica 2013;80:496-512.
2.
Bennett KM, Hughes GM, Smith PT: Coping, depressive feelings and gender differences in late life widowhood. Aging Mental Health 2005;9:348-353.
[PubMed]
3.
Bennett KM, Soulsby LK: Wellbeing in bereavement and widowhood. Illness Crisis Loss 2012;20:321-337.
4.
Bennett KM: ‘You can't spend years with someone and just cast them aside': augmented identity in older British widows. J Women Aging 2010;22:204-217.
[PubMed]
5.
Bonanno GA, Westphal M, Mancini AD: Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011;7:511-535.
[PubMed]
6.
Luhmann M, Hofmann W, Eid M, Lucas RE: Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol 2012;102:592-615.
[PubMed]
7.
Stroebe MS, Schut H, Stroebe W: Health outcomes of bereavement. Lancet 2007;370:1960-1973.
[PubMed]
8.
Ott CH, Lueger RJ, Kelber ST, Prigerson HG: Spousal bereavement in older adults: common, resilient, and chronic grief with defining characteristics. J Nerv Ment Dis 2007;195:332-341.
[PubMed]
9.
Gerrish N, Dyck MJ, Marsh A: Post-traumatic growth and bereavement. Mortality 2009;14:226-244.
10.
Mancini AD, Bonanno GA, Clark AE: Stepping off the hedonic treadmill individual differences in response to major life events. J Individ Differ 2011;32:144-152.
11.
Bonanno GA, Wortman CB, Lehman DR, Tweed RG, Haring M, Sonnega J, Carr D, Nesse RM: Resilience to loss and chronic grief: a prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. J Pers Soc Psychol 2002;83:1150-1164.
[PubMed]
12.
Bennett KM: How to achieve resilience as an older widower: turning points or gradual change? Ageing Soc 2010;30:369-382.
13.
Coifman KG, Bonanno GA, Rafaeli E: Affect dynamics, bereavement and resilience to loss. J Happiness Studies 2007;8:371-392.
14.
Mancini AD, Bonanno GA: Predictors and parameters of resilience to loss: toward an individual differences model. J Pers 2009;77:1805-1832.
[PubMed]
15.
Ingram RE, Luxton DD: Vulnerability-stress models; in Hankin BL, Abela JRZ (eds): Development of Psychopathology: A Vulnerability Stress Perspective. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 2005, pp 32-46.
16.
Pai M, Carr D: Do personality traits moderate the effect of late-life spousal loss on psychological distress? J Health Soc Behav 2010;51:183-199.
[PubMed]
17.
Stroebe M, Schut H: The dual process model of coping with bereavement: rationale and description. Death Studies 1999;23:197-224.
[PubMed]
18.
Rossi NE, Bisconti TL, Bergeman CS: The role of dispositional resilience in regaining life satisfaction after the loss of a spouse. Death Studies 2007;31:863-883.
[PubMed]
19.
Windle G, Markland DA, Woods RT: Examination of a theoretical model of psychological resilience in older age. Aging Ment Health 2008;12:285-292.
[PubMed]
20.
Windle G, Bennett KM, Noyes J: A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:8.
[PubMed]
21.
Ong AD, Fuller-Rowell TE, Bonanno GA: Prospective predictors of positive emotions following spousal loss. Psychol Aging 2010;25:653-660.
[PubMed]
22.
Wagnild GM, Young HM: Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. J Nurs Meas 1993;1:165-178.
[PubMed]
23.
Windle G, Bennett KM: Resilience and caring relationships; in Ungar M (ed): Social Ecology of Resilience. New York, Springer, 2011, pp 219-232.
24.
Ha JH, Ingersoll-Dayton B: Moderators in the relationship between social contact and psychological distress among widowed adults. Aging Ment Health 2011;15:354-363.
[PubMed]
25.
Utz R, Swenson KL, Caserta M, Lund D, DeVries B: Feeling lonely versus being alone: loneliness and social support among recently bereaved persons. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2013;69:85-94.
[PubMed]
26.
Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E: Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84:527-539.
[PubMed]
27.
Kaltman S, Bonanno GA: Trauma and bereavement: examining the impact of sudden and violent deaths. J Anxiety Disord 2003;17:131-147.
[PubMed]
28.
Itzhar-Nabarro Z, Smoski MJ: A review of theoretical and empirical perspectives on marital satisfaction and bereavement outcomes: implications for working with older adults. Clin Gerontol 2012;35:257-269.
29.
Carr D, House JS, Kessler RC, Nesse RM, Sonnega J, Wortman C: Marital quality and psychological adjustment to widowhood among older adults: a longitudinal analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2000;55:197-207.
[PubMed]
30.
Perrig-Chiello P, Knöpfli B, Hutchison S: Vulnerability following a critical life event: temporary crisis or lasting distress? A psychological controversy and its methodological implications; in Roberts C, Oris M, Ernst Stähli M, Joye D (eds): Surveying Vulnerabilities. Berlin, Springer, in press.
31.
Iacus SM, King G, Porro G: Causal inference without balance checking: coarsened exact matching. Polit Analysis 2012,20:1-24.
32.
Ho DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA: MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Software 2011;42:1-28.
33.
Hautzinger M, Bailer M: ADS: Allgemeine Depressionsskala. Weinheim, Beltz Test, 1993.
34.
Radloff LS: The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385-401.
35.
Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, Trexler L: The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale. J Consult Clin Psychol 1974;42:861-865.
[PubMed]
36.
Krampen G: Skalen zur Erfassung von Hoffnungslosigkeit (H-Skalen). Deutsche Bearbeitung und Weiterentwicklung der H-Skala von Aaron T. Beck. Handanweisung. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1994.
37.
De Jong Gierveld J, Kamphuis F: The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Appl Psychol Meas 1985;9:289-299.
38.
De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg T: Manual of the Loneliness Scale. Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, 1999 (updated from the printed version November 23, 2011; retrieved from http://home.fsw.vu.nl/TG.van.Tilburg/manual_loneliness_scale_1999.html).
39.
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S: The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assessment 1985;49:71-75.
[PubMed]
40.
Schumacher J: SWLS - satisfaction with life scale; in Schumacher J, Klaiberg A, Brähler E (eds): Diagnostische Verfahren zu Lebensqualität und Wohlbefinden. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 2003.
41.
Idler EL, Kasl SV: Self-ratings of health: do they also predict change in functional ability? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1995;50:344-353.
[PubMed]
42.
Rammstedt B, John OP: Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J Res Pers 2007;41:203-212.
43.
Schumacher J, Leppert K, Gunzelmann T, Straus B, Brähler E: The resilience scale - a questionnaire to assess resilience as a personality characteristic. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother 2005;53:16-39.
44.
Lubke GH, Muthen B: Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychol Methods 2005;10:21-39.
[PubMed]
45.
Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthen BO: Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling 2007;14:535-569.
46.
Lanza ST, Tan X, Bray BC: Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: a flexible model-based approach. Struct Equ Modeling 2013;20:1-26.
[PubMed]
47.
Asparouhov T, Muthén B: Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: 3-step approaches using Mplus. Mplus Web Notes 2013;15:1-24.
48.
Bennett KM, Hughes GM, Smith PT: The effects of strategy and gender on coping with widowhood in later life. Omega J Death Dying 2005;51:33-52.
49.
Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL: Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1991.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2015
You do not currently have access to this content.
