Background: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy are proxy indicators for inappropriate medicine use. Inappropriate medicine use in older people leads to adverse clinical outcomes. Objective: The objectives of this study were to investigate the prevalence and trends of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in older people in New Zealand from 2005 to 2013, analyzing the pharmaceutical collections maintained by the Ministry of Health. Methods: A repeated cross-sectional analysis of population-level dispensing data was conducted from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2013. Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy in individuals were defined as the use of 5-9 medicines and ≥10 medicines, respectively, dispensed concurrently for a period of ≥90 days. Differences in polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy between 2005 and 2013 were examined. A multinomial regression model was used to predict sociodemographic characteristics associated with polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy. Results: Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were found to be higher in 2013 compared to 2005 (polypharmacy: 29.5 vs. 23.4%, p < 0.001; hyperpolypharmacy: 2.1 vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). The risk of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was higher in females, in those aged 80-84 years, in the Māori population (for polypharmacy) and the Middle Eastern, Latin American, or African population (for hyperpolypharmacy), in people living in the Southern-district health board, and in individuals with increasing deprivation. Conclusion: The population of New Zealand is aging and the number of older people with multiple chronic conditions is increasing. The proportion of older people exposed to polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy has increased in 2013 compared to 2005. Our study provides important information to alert health policy makers, researchers, and clinicians about the dire need to reduce the medication burden in older New Zealanders.

1.
Patterson SM, Hughes C, Kerse N, Cardwell CR, Bradley MC: Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;5:CD008165.
2.
Gnjidic D, Hilmerv SN, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Cumming RG, Handelsman DJ, McLachlan AJ, Abernethy DR, Banks E, Le Couteur DG: High-risk prescribing and incidence of frailty among older community-dwelling men. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91:521-528.
3.
Haider SI, Johnell K, Weitoft GR, Thorslund M, Fastbom J: The influence of educational level on polypharmacy and inappropriate drug use: a register-based study of more than 600,000 older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:62-69.
4.
Gnjidic D, Le Couteur DG, Pearson S-A, McLachlan AJ, Viney R, Hilmer SN, Blyth FM, Joshy G, Banks E: High risk prescribing in older adults: prevalence, clinical and economic implications and potential for intervention at the population level. BMC Public Health 2013;13:115.
5.
Fulton MM, Allen ER: Polypharmacy in the elderly: a literature review. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2005;17:123-132.
6.
Linjakumpu T, Hartikainen S, Klaukka T, Veijola J, Kivela SL, Isoaho R: Use of medications and polypharmacy are increasing among the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:809-817.
7.
Gnjidic D, Hilmer SN, Blyth FM, Naganathan V, Waite L, Seibel MJ, McLachlan AJ, Cumming RG, Handelsman DJ, Le Couteur DG: Polypharmacy cutoff and outcomes: five or more medicines were used to identify community-dwelling older men at risk of different adverse outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:989-995.
8.
Corsonello A, Pedone C, Corica F, Incalzi RA: Polypharmacy in elderly patients at discharge from the acute care hospital. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2007;3:197-203.
9.
Onder G, Pedone C, Landi F, Cesari M, Della Vedova C, Bernabei R, Gambassi G: Adverse drug reactions as cause of hospital admissions: results from the Italian group of pharmacoepidemiology in the elderly (GIFA). J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1962-1968.
10.
Flaherty JH, Perry HM 3rd, Lynchard GS, Morley JE: Polypharmacy and hospitalization among older home care patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M554-M559.
11.
Hilmer SN, Gnjidic D: The effects of polypharmacy in older adults. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2009;85:86-88.
12.
Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER: Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2014;13:57-65.
13.
Nishtala PS, Narayan SW, Wang T, Hilmer SN: Associations of drug burden index with falls, general practitioner visits, and mortality in older people. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2014;23:753-758.
14.
Kaufman DW, Kelly JP, Rosenberg L, Anderson TE, Mitchell AA: Recent patterns of medication use in the ambulatory adult population of the United States: The Slone Survey. JAMA 2002;287:337-344.
15.
Jyrkka J, Enlund H, Korhonen MJ, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S: Patterns of drug use and factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in elderly persons: results of the Kuopio 75+ study: a cross-sectional analysis. Drugs Aging 2009;26:493-503.
16.
Hovstadius B, Hovstadius K, Åstrand B, Petersson G: Increasing polypharmacy - an individual-based study of the Swedish population 2005-2008. BMC Clin Pharmacol 2010;10:16.
17.
Jyrkka J, Enlund H, Lavikainen P, Sulkava R, Hartikainen S: Association of polypharmacy with nutritional status, functional ability and cognitive capacity over a three-year period in an elderly population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011;20:514-522.
18.
Atkinson J, Salmond C, Crampton P: NZDep2013 Index of Deprivation. New Zealand, Ministry of Health, 2014.
19.
Gokce Kutsal Y, Barak A, Atalay A, Baydar T, Kucukoglu S, Tuncer T, Hizmetli S, Dursun N, Eyigor S, Saridogan M, Bodur H, Canturk F, Turhanoglu A, Arslan S, Basaran A: Polypharmacy in the elderly: a multicenter study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2009;10:486-490.
20.
Bjerrum L, Sogaard J, Hallas J, Kragstrup J: Polypharmacy: correlations with sex, age and drug regimen. A prescription database study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1998;54:197-202.
21.
The Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC): Memorandum of understanding relating to the working relationship between PHARMAC and DHBs. http://www.pharmac.health.nz/about/accountability-documents/relationshipagreements (accessed March 17, 2014).
22.
British Cardiac Society; British Hypertension Society; Diabetes UK; HEART UK; Primary Care Cardiovascular Society; Stroke Association: JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. Heart 2005;91(suppl 5):v1-v52.
23.
The treatment of heart failure. Task Force of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1997;18:736-753.
24.
Eccles M, Freemantle N, Mason J: North of England evidence based development project: guideline for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in primary care management of adults with symptomatic heart failure. BMJ 1998;316:1369-1375.
25.
Konstam MA, Dracup K, Baker DW, Bottorff MB, Brooks NH, Dacey RA, Dunbar SB, Jackson AB, Jessup M, Johnson JC, et al: Heart failure: evaluation and care of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Card Fail 1995;1:183-187.
26.
Heart Failure Guidelines for Health Professionals. New Zealand, National Heart Foundation of New Zealand, 2009.
27.
Vermeer NS, Bajorek BV: Utilization of evidence-based therapy for the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes in Australian practice. J Clin Pharm Ther 2008;33:591-601.
28.
Acute Coronary Syndrome Guidelines Working Group: Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2006. Med J Aust 2006;184:1-32.
29.
2012 Writing Committee Members, Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE Jr, Ettinger SM, Fesmire FM, Ganiats TG, Lincoff AM, Peterson ED, Philippides GJ, Theroux P, Wenger NK, Zidar JP, Anderson JL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guideline for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2007 guideline and replacing the 2011 focused update): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2012;126:875-910.
30.
Hilmer SN, McLachlan AJ, Le Couteur DG: Clinical pharmacology in the geriatric patient. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2007;21:217-230.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.