Background and Objective: We investigated usage of and satisfaction with hearing aid devices in everyday life among older adults with hearing loss. Our research further advances the role of hearing contexts for hearing aid use and satisfaction. A central assumption was that hearing aid owners adapt the usage of the hearing aid devices to contextual demands of hearing depending on their personal resources. Methods: In a sample of 158 hearing aid owners aged 50-88 years, we examined proactive hearing aid use in everyday life and its association with the usage of, and satisfaction with, hearing aids. The study was administered online. Using an adapted version of the day-reconstruction method, participants reported hearing episodes during the preceding day. Hearing aid use was assessed via the proportion of waking time with hearing aids. Satisfaction with hearing aids was measured via the Satisfaction with Daily Amplification scale. Results: When using the hearing aids more often, and when reporting greater satisfaction, older adults indicated more diverse listening situations and experienced less variability in hearing quality with hearing aids. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hearing aid owners may proactively use the hearing devices to master situation-specific demands and difficulties in hearing quality. Such findings underline that hearing aid use and satisfaction depend on the extent to which the devices help to manage everyday life successfully.

Keywords:
Hearing loss, Hearing impairment, Adaptive processes, Hearing aids, Everyday activities
1.
Tesch-Römer C: Psychological effects of hearing aid use in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997;52B:127-138.
2.
Hartley D, Rochtchina E, Newall P, Golding M, Mitchell P: Use of hearing aids and assistive listening devices in an older Australian population. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21:642-653.
3.
Bertoli S, Staehelin K, Zemp E, Schindler C, Bodmer D, Probst R: Survey on hearing aid use and satisfaction in Switzerland and their determinants. Int J Audiol 2009;48:183-195.
4.
Hougaard S, Ruf S: EuroTrak I: A consumer survey about hearing aids in Germany, France, and the UK. Hear Rev 2011;18:12-28.
5.
Uriarte M, Denzin L, Dunstan A, Sellars J, Hickson L: Measuring hearing aid outcomes using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaire: Australian data. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:383-402.
6.
Erber NP: Use of hearing aids by older people: influence of non-auditory factors (vision, manual dexterity). Int J Audiol 2003;42:21-25.
7.
Lunner T: Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol 2003;42(suppl 1):s49-s58.
8.
Wilson C, Stephens D: Reasons for referral and attitudes toward hearing aids: do they affect outcome? Clin Otolaryngol 2003;28:81-84.
9.
Wiesner M, Tesch-Roemer C: Hörgerätebenutzung im Alter: Der Zusammenhang zwischen Intention und Verhalten. Z Gerontol Geriatr 1996;29:273-279.
10.
Takahashi G, Martinez CD, Beamer S, Bridges J, Noffsinger D, Sugiura K, Bratt GW, Williams DW: Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NICDCD/VDA follow-up study. J Am Acad Audiol 2007;18:323-349.
11.
Saunders GH, Jutai JW: Hearing specific and generic measures of the psychosocial impact of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2004;15:238-248.
12.
Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA: Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes. Ear Hear 2007;28:141-162.
13.
Li-Korotky HS: Age-related hearing loss: quality of care for quality of life. Gerontologist 2012;52:265-271.
14.
Wong LLN, Hickson L, McPherson B: Hearing aid satisfaction: what does research from the past 20 years say? Trends Amplif 2003;7:117-161.
15.
Williger B, Lang FR: Managing age-related hearing loss: how to use hearing aids efficiently. Gerontology 2014;60:440-447.
16.
Hallberg LRM, Erlandsson SI, Carlsson SG: Coping strategies used by middle-aged males with noise-induced hearing loss, with and without tinnitus. Psychol Health 1992;7:273-288.
17.
Melenhorst A-S, Rogers WA, Bouwhuis DG: Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. Psychol Aging 2006;21:190-195.
18.
Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 2004;306:1776-1780.
19.
Laplante-Levesque A, Knudsen LV, Preminger JE, Jones L, Nielsen C, Oberg M, Lunner T, Hickson L, Naylor G, Kramer SE: Hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation: perspectives of adults with hearing impairment. Int J Audiol 2012;51:93-102.
20.
John D: Subjective acceleration of time in older adults' everyday life: motivation matters; PhD thesis, Erlangen, 2014.
21.
Hamaker E: Why researchers should think ‘within-person': a paradigmatic rationale; in Mehl MR, Conner TS (eds): Handbook of Methods for Studying Daily Life. New York, Guilford Publications, 2012, pp 43-61.
22.
Cox RM, Alexander GC: Validation of the SADL questionnaire. Ear Hear 2001;22:151-160.
23.
Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H: Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology 1995;34:311-320.
24.
Angermeyer MC, Kilian R, Matschinger H: Deutschsprachige Version der WHO Instrumente zur Erfassung von Lebensqualität WHOQOL-100 und WHOQOL-bref. Göttingen, Hogrefe, 2000.
25.
Saunders GH, Cienkowski KM, Forsline A, Fausti S: Normative data for the attitudes towards loss of hearing questionnaire. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:637-652.
26.
Baltes MM, Maas I, Wilms H-U, Borchelt M, Little TD: Everyday competence in old and very old age: theoretical considerations and empirical findings; in Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds): The Berlin Aging Study: Aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge, University Press, 1999, pp 384-402.
27.
Baltes MM, Carstensen LL: The process of successful ageing. Ageing Soc 1996;16:397-422.
28.
Baltes PB, Baltes MM: Psychological perspectives on successful aging: the model of selective optimization with compensation; in Baltes PB, Baltes MM (eds): Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences. New York, Cambridge University Press 1990, pp 1-34.
29.
Gatehouse S, Naylor G, Elberling C: Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol 2003;42:77-85.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.