Background: There is a need for simple clinical tools that can objectively assess the fall risk in people with dementia. Wearable sensors seem to have the potential for fall prediction; however, there has been limited work performed in this important area. Objective: To explore the validity of sensor-derived physical activity (PA) parameters for predicting future falls in people with dementia. To compare sensor-based fall risk assessment with conventional fall risk measures. Methods: This was a cohort study of people with confirmed dementia discharged from a geriatric rehabilitation ward. PA was quantified using 24-hour motion-sensor monitoring at the beginning of the study. PA parameters (percentage of walking, standing, sitting, and lying; duration of single walking, standing, and sitting bouts) were extracted using specific algorithms. Conventional assessment included performance-based tests (Timed Up and Go Test, Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment, 5-chair stand) and questionnaires (cognition, ADL status, fear of falling, depression, previous faller). Outcome measures were fallers (at least one fall in the 3-month follow-up period) versus non-fallers. Results: 77 people were included in the study (age 81.8 ± 6.3; community-dwelling 88%, institutionalized 12%). Surprisingly, fallers and non-fallers did not differ on any conventional assessment (p = 0.069-0.991), except for ‘previous faller' (p = 0.006). Interestingly, several PA parameters discriminated between the groups. The ‘walking bout average duration', ‘longest walking bout duration' and ‘walking bout duration variability' were lower in fallers, compared to non-fallers (p = 0.008-0.027). The ‘standing bout average duration' was higher in fallers (p = 0.050). Two variables, ‘walking bout average duration' [odds ratio (OR) 0.79, p = 0.012] and ‘previous faller' (OR 4.44, p = 0.007) were identified as independent predictors for falls. The OR for a ‘walking bout average duration' <15 s for predicting fallers was 6.30 (p = 0.020). Combining ‘walking bout average duration' and ‘previous faller' improved fall prediction (OR 7.71, p < 0.001, sensitivity/specificity 72%/76%). Discussion: Results demonstrate that sensor-derived PA parameters are independent predictors of the fall risk and may have higher diagnostic accuracy in persons with dementia compared to conventional fall risk measures. Our findings highlight the potential of telemonitoring technology for estimating the fall risk. Results should be confirmed in a larger study and by measuring PA over a longer period of time.

Keywords:
Fall prediction, Body-worn sensor, Physical activity, Dementia
1.
Tinetti ME, Inouye SK, Gill TM, Doucette JT: Shared risk factors for falls, incontinence, and functional dependence. Unifying the approach to geriatric syndromes. JAMA 1995;273:1348-1353.
2.
Tinetti ME, Williams CS: Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1279-1284.
3.
Morris JC, Rubin EH, Morris EJ, Mandel SA: Senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type: an important risk factor for serious falls. J Gerontol 1987;42:412-417.
4.
Van Doorn C, Gruber‐Baldini AL, Zimmerman S, Richard Hebel J, Port CL, Baumgarten M, Quinn CC, Taler G, May C, Magaziner J: Dementia as a risk factor for falls and fall injuries among nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:1213-1218.
5.
Buchner DM, Larson EB: Falls and fractures in patients with Alzheimer-type dementia. JAMA 1987;257:1492-1495.
6.
Lord SR, Sherrington C, Menz HB: Falls in Older People. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
7.
Shaw FE: Falls in cognitive impairment and dementia. Clin Geriatr Med 2002;18:159-173.
8.
Härlein J, Dassen T, Halfens RJ, Heinze C: Fall risk factors in older people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2009;65:922-933.
9.
Allan LM, Ballard CG, Rowan EN, Kenny RA: Incidence and prediction of falls in dementia: a prospective study in older people. PLoS One 2009;4:e5521.
10.
Katz IR, Rupnow M, Kozma C, Schneider L: Risperidone and falls in ambulatory nursing home residents with dementia and psychosis or agitation: secondary analysis of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;12:499-508.
11.
Suttanon P, Hill KD, Said CM, Dodd KJ: A longitudinal study of change in falls risk and balance and mobility in healthy older people and people with Alzheimer disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92:676-685.
12.
Najafi B, Armstrong DG, Mohler J: Novel wearable technology for assessing spontaneous daily physical activity and risk of falling in older adults with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2013;7:1147-1160.
13.
Najafi B, Aminian K, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Loew F, Bula CJ, Robert P: Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003;50:711-723.
14.
Aminian K, Najafi B: Capturing human motion using body-fixed sensors: outdoor measurement and clinical applications. Comput Anim Virtual Worlds 2004;15:79-94.
15.
Najafi B, Aminian K, Loew F, Blanc Y, Robert PA: Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;49:843-851.
16.
Lord SR, Menz HB, Sherrington C: Home environment risk factors for falls in older people and the efficacy of home modifications. Age Ageing 2006;35:ii55-ii59.
17.
Weiss A, Brozgol M, Dorfman M, Herman T, Shema S, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM: Does the evaluation of gait quality during daily life provide insight into fall risk? A novel approach using 3-day accelerometer recordings. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27:742-752.
18.
Shany T, Redmond SJ, Marschollek M, Lovell NH: Assessing fall risk using wearable sensors: a practical discussion. A review of the practicalities and challenges associated with the use of wearable sensors for quantification of fall risk in older people. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2012;45:694-706.
19.
Farrell MK, Rutt RA, Lusardi MM, Williams AK: Are scores on the physical performance test useful in determination of risk of future falls in individuals with dementia? J Geriatr Phys Ther 2011;34:57-63.
20.
Hauer K, Oster P: Measuring functional performance in persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:949-950.
21.
Shany T, Redmond SJ, Narayanan MR, Lovell NH: Sensors-based wearable systems for monitoring of human movement and falls. IEEE Sens J 2012;12:658-670.
22.
Howcroft J, Kofman J, Lemaire ED: Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:91.
23.
Greene BR, Doheny EP, Walsh C, Cunningham C, Crosby L, Kenny RA: Evaluation of falls risk in community-dwelling older adults using body-worn sensors. Gerontology 2012;58:472-480.
24.
Marschollek M, Rehwald A, Wolf K, Gietzelt M, Nemitz G, Meyer zu Schwabedissen H, Haux R: Sensor-based fall risk assessment - an expert ‘to go'. Methods Inf Med 2011;50:420.
25.
Senden R, Savelberg H, Grimm B, Heyligers I, Meijer K: Accelerometry-based gait analysis, an additional objective approach to screen subjects at risk for falling. Gait Posture 2012;36:296-300.
26.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198.
27.
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology 1984;34:939-944.
28.
Roman GC, Tatemichi TK, Erkinjuntti T, Cummings JL, Masdeu JC, Garcia JH, Amaducci L, Orgogozo JM, Brun A, Hofman A, et al: Vascular dementia: diagnostic criteria for research studies. Report of the NINDS-AIREN International Workshop. Neurology 1993;43:250-260.
29.
Morris JC, Mohs RC, Rogers H, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A: Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988;24:641-652.
30.
Oswald WD: Nürnberger Altersinventar (NAI). Göttingen, Hogrefe, 1995.
31.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-65.
32.
Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, Kempen G, Piot-Ziegler C, Todd C: Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age Ageing 2005;34:614-619.
33.
Alexopoulos GS, Abrams RC, Young RC, Shamoian CA: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia. Biol Psychiatry 1988;23:271-284.
34.
Parmelee PA, Thuras PD, Katz IR, Lawton MP: Validation of the cumulative illness rating scale in a geriatric residential population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:130-137.
35.
Tinetti ME: Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986;34:119-126.
36.
Kegelmeyer DA, Kloos AD, Thomas KM, Kostyk SK: Reliability and validity of the Tinetti Mobility Test for individuals with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 2007;87:1369-1378.
37.
Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed ‘up & go': a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142-148.
38.
Guralnik J, Simonsick E, Ferrucci L, Glynn R, Berkman L, Blazer D, Scherr P, Wallace R: A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J Gerontol 1994;49:M85-M94.
39.
Salarian A, Russmann H, Vingerhoets FJ, Burkhard PR, Aminian K: Ambulatory monitoring of physical activities in patients with Parkinson's disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:2296-2299.
40.
Hauer K, Lamb SE, Jorstad EC, Todd C, Becker C: Systematic review of definitions and methods of measuring falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials. Age Ageing 2006;35:5-10.
41.
Schoene D, Wu SM, Mikolaizak AS, Menant JC, Smith ST, Delbaere K, Lord SR: Discriminative ability and predictive validity of the timed up and go test in identifying older people who fall: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:202-208.
42.
Benzinger P, Iwarsson S, Kroog A, Beische D, Lindemann U, Klenk J, Becker C: The association between the home environment and physical activity in community-dwelling older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2014:1-9.
43.
Nicolai S, Benzinger P, Skelton DA, Aminian K, Becker C, Lindemann U: Day-to-day variability of physical activity of older adults living in the community. J Aging Phys Act 2010;18:75-86.
44.
Martino-Saltzman D, Blasch BB, Morris RD, McNeal LW: Travel behavior of nursing home residents perceived as wanderers and non-wanderers. Gerontologist 1991;31:666-672.
45.
Camicioli R, Howieson D, Lehman S, Kaye J: Talking while walking the effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1997;48:955-958.
46.
Bath PA, Morgan K: Differential risk factor profiles for indoor and outdoor falls in older people living at home in Nottingham, UK. Eur J Epidemiol 1999;15:65-73.
47.
Feuering R, Vered E, Kushnir T, Jette AM, Melzer I: Differences between self-reported and observed physical functioning in independent older adults. Disabil Rehabil 2013, Epup ahead of print.
48.
Franssen EH, Souren L, Torossian CL, Reisberg B: Equilibrium and limb coordination in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47:463.
49.
Tinetti ME: Prevention of falls and fall injuries in elderly persons: a research agenda. Prev Med 1994;23:756-762.
50.
Rowe DA, Kemble CD, Robinson TS, Mahar MT: Daily walking in older adults: day-to-day variability and criterion-referenced validity of total daily step counts. J Phys Act Health 2007;4:434-446.
51.
Algase DL, Beattie ER, Bogue E-L, Yao L: The Algase Wandering Scale: initial psychometrics of a new caregiver reporting tool. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2001;16:141-152.
52.
Cohen-Mansfield J, Marx MS, Rosenthal AS: A description of agitation in a nursing home. J Gerontol 1989;44:M77-M84.
53.
Iwarsson S, Slaug B: The Housing Enabler. An Instrument for Assessing and Analysing Accessibility Problems in Housing. Nävlinge & Staffanstorp, Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Data Management, 2001.
54.
Delbaere K, Close JCT, Taylor M, Wesson J, Lord SR: Validation of the Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale in cognitively impaired older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2013;68:1098-1102.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.