Background: The Norton scale is used for assessing pressure ulcer risk. The association between admission Norton scale scores (ANSS), hospitalization length, complications, and mortality in elderly patients admitted to internal medicine departments has never been studied. Objective: To determine if ANSS are associated with hospitalization length, complications, in-hospital mortality, and 1-year mortality in elderly patients admitted to an internal medicine department. Methods: Medical charts of consecutive elderly (≥65 years) patients admitted to a single internal medicine department between January and March 2009 were studied for ANSS, demographics, comorbidities, hospitalization length, complications during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and 1-year mortality. Complications during hospitalization included acute coronary syndrome, major arrhythmias, major bleeding, stroke, systemic infections, organ failure, thromboembolism, etc. ANSS ≤14 were considered low. Results: The final cohort included 259 elderly patients: 54.4% were women, the mean age was 81.6 years, and the mean hospitalization length was 3.7 days. Overall, 7.3% of the patients had complications other than pressure ulcers, 3.9% died during hospitalization, and 28.6% died within 1 year. The mean ANSS was 15.4, and 37.8% of the patients had low ANSS. Patients with low ANSS had longer hospitalization (4.7 vs. 2.9 days; p = 0.002), a higher incidence of complications during hospitalization (odds ratio: 3.9; p = 0.006), and higher rates of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 7.0; p = 0.007) relative to patients with high ANSS. Regression analysis showed that ANSS were independently negatively associated with hospitalization length, complications during hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality (p < 0.0001, p = 0.003, and p = 0.018, respectively) regardless of age, gender, comorbidities, and pressure ulcer appearance. Rates of 1-year mortality were similar in patients with low and high ANSS. Conclusions: The Norton scale may be used for predicting hospitalization length, complications during hospitalization other than pressure ulcers, and in-hospital mortality in elderly patients admitted to an internal medicine department.

Keywords:
Complications, Elderly patients, Mortality, Norton scale, Pressure ulcers
1.
Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Garcia-Fernandez FP, Lopez-Medina IM, Alvarez-Nieto C: Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2006;54:94-110.
2.
Norton D, McLaren R, Exton-Smith AN: An Investigation of Geriatric Nursing Problems in the Hospital. London. National Corporation for the Care of Old People, 1962.
3.
Norton D: Calculating the risk: reflections on the Norton Scale. Decubitus 1989;2:24-31.
4.
Justo D, Guy N, Halperin E, Lerman Y: Admission Norton scale scores are associated with long-term mortality following rehabilitation in older adults. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:172-175.
5.
Justo D, Fridman V, Borodin O, Rozenberg F, Rabinovich A, Lerman Y: Admission Norton scale scores correlate with rehabilitation outcome and length in elderly patients following cerebrovascular accident. Aging Clin Exp Res 2011;23:445-449.
6.
Justo D, Vislapu N, Shvedov V, Fickte M, Danylesko A, Kimelman P, et al: Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) correlate with rehabilitation outcome and length in elderly patients following hip arthroplasty. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;53:e33-e36.
7.
Guy N, Lerman Y, Justo D: Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) correlate with rehabilitation outcome and length in elderly patients with deconditioning. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;54:381-384.
8.
Halperin E, Engel T, Sherman S, Justo D: Low admission Norton scale scores are associated with falls long after rehabilitation in the elderly with hip fractures. Clin Interv Aging 2012;7:431-436.
9.
Shacham N, Lerman Y, Justo D: Low Norton scale scores are associated with medical complications other than pressure ulcers during rehabilitation in the elderly. Eur Geriatr Med 2013;4:91-94.
10.
Gold A, Sever R, Lerman Y, Salai M, Justo D: Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) and postoperative complications following hip fracture surgery in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;55:173-176.
11.
Asleh K, Sever R, Hilu S, Ron R, Gold A, Aharon M, Salai M, Justo D: Association between low admission Norton scale scores and postoperative complications after elective THA in elderly patients. Orthopedics 2012;35:e1302-e1306.
12.
Sever R, Gold A, Segal O, Regev G, Keynan O, Salai M, Justo D: Admission Norton scale scores (ANSS) are associated with post-operative complications following spine fracture surgery in the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;55:177-180.
13.
Online ICD9 codes. http://icd9cm.chrisendres.com/ (accessed October 22, 2010).
14.
Online NPUAP staging system. http://www.npuap.org/ (accessed October 22, 2010).
15.
Baath C, Hall-Lord ML, Idvall E, Wiberg-Hedman K, Wilde Larsson B: Interrater reliability using Modified Norton Scale, Pressure Ulcer Card, Short Form-Mini Nutritional Assessment by registered and enrolled nurses in clinical practice. J Clin Nurs 2008;17:618-626.
16.
Cohen RR, Lagoo-Deenadayalan SA, Heflin MT, Sloane R, Eisen I, Thacker JM, Whitson HE: Exploring predictors of complication in older surgical patients: a deficit accumulation index and the Braden Scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;60:1609-1615.
17.
De Saint-Hubert M, Schoevaerdts D, Cornette P, D'Hoore W, Boland B, Swine C: Predicting functional adverse outcomes in hospitalized older patients: a systematic review of screening tools. J Nutr Health Aging 2010;14:394-399.
18.
Onder G, Pedone C, Landi F, Cesari M, Della Vedova C, Bernabei R, Gambassi G: Adverse drug reactions as cause of hospital admissions: results from the Italian group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly (GIFA). J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1962-1968.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.