Background: Maintaining social relationships has been defined as a core element of aging well. With a considerable amount of older adults living alone, social media provides the possibility to engage in meaningful social contact, e.g. by joining online social networks and online discussion forums. Objective: The review encompasses current knowledge of prerequisites in social media use of older adults such as functional capacity, information and communications technology-related knowledge, and favorable attitudes towards social media. Then, the potential of social media use for clinical practice and possible negative consequences are outlined. Method: Literature on social media use from a gerontological perspective was reviewed in July and August 2012. Results: Online communities are suitable for providing and receiving social support when confronted with a difficult life situation, regardless of geographical location or time. From a practitioner's perspective, social media can be used to advance health-related knowledge such as information on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of specific conditions and disorders. Further positive consequences have been shown to be overcoming loneliness, relieving stress, and raising feelings of control and self-efficacy. Possible negative consequences could be misuse of personal data as well as the distribution and uncritical adoption of potentially harmful information via online communities. Discussion: The potential of social media in clinical practice is reflected in a wide range of intervention possibilities for older adults. However, with the rise of social media, new threats emerge for older adults as well.

Keywords:
Social contacts, Technology, Loneliness, Old age, Older people, Social media, Online social networks, Online communities
1.
Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme. http://www.aal-europe.eu/call-2/. Accessed July 30, 2012.
2.
Zickuhr K, Madden M: Older adults and Internet use. For the first time, half of adults aged 65 and older are online. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Older-adults-and-internet-use.aspx.
3.
Lee D, Helal S, Anton S, De Deugd S, Smith A: Participatory and persuasive telehealth. Gerontology 2012;58:269-281.
4.
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M: Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 2009;53:59-68.
5.
SeniorNet Fact Sheet. http://seniornet.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=43&Itemid=68. Accessed September 13, 2012.
6.
Charness N, Boot WR: Aging and information technology use. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2009;18:253-258.
7.
Lee B, Chen Y, Hewitt L: Age differences in constraints encountered by seniors in their use of computers and the Internet. Comput Human Behav 2011;27:1231-1237.
8.
Xie B, Watkins I, Golbeck J, Huang M: Understanding and changing older adults' perceptions and learning of social media. Educ Gerontol 2012;38:282.
9.
Lehtinen V, Näsänen J, Sarvas R: ‘A little silly and empty-headed': older adults' understandings of social networking sites. Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology. Cambridge, British Computer Society, 2009, pp 45-54.
10.
Pfeil U, Zaphiris P, Wilson S: Older adults' perceptions and experiences of online social support. Interact Comput 2009;21:159-172.
11.
Nimrod G: Seniors' online communities: a quantitative content analysis. Gerontologist 2010;50:382-392.
12.
Xie B: Multimodal computer-mediated communication and social support among older Chinese Internet users. J Comput Mediated Commun 2008;13:728-750.
13.
Lewandowski J, Rosenberg BD, Parks MJ, Siegel JT: The effect of informal social support: face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication. Comput Human Behav 2011;27:1806-1814.
14.
Cornejo R, Favela J, Tentori M: Ambient displays for integrating older adults into social networking sites. Collaboration and technology. Lec Notes Comput Sci 2010;6257:321-336.
15.
Jaeger PT, Bo Xie: Developing online community accessibility guidelines for persons with disabilities and older adults. J Disabil Policy Stud 2009;20:55-63.
16.
Perkins EA, LaMartin KM: The Internet as social support for older carers of adults with intellectual disabilities. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil 2012;9:53-62.
17.
Saleh J, Robinson BS, Kugler NW, Illingworth KD, Patel P, Saleh KJ: Effect of social media in health care and orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2012;35:294-297.
18.
Barak A, Boniel-Nissim M, Suler J: Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Comput Hum Behav 2008;24:1867-1883.
19.
Nahm ES, Barker B, Resnick B, Covington B, Magaziner J, Brennan PF: Effects of a social cognitive theory-based hip fracture prevention web site for older adults. Comput Inform Nurs 2010;28:371-379.
20.
Wright K: Computer-mediated social support, older adults, and coping. J Commun 2000;50:100-118.
21.
Tanis M, Das E, Fortgens-Sillmann M: Finding care for the caregiver? Active participation in online health forums attenuates the negative effect of caregiver strain on wellbeing. Commun Eur J Commun Res 2011;36:51-66.
22.
Shepherd CE, Aagard S: Journal writing with Web 2.0 tools: a vision for older adults. Educ Gerontol 2011;37:606-620.
23.
Luxton DD, June JD, Fairall JM: Social media and suicide: a public health perspective. Am J Public Health 2012;102:S195-S200.
24.
Chou HT, Edge N: ‘They are happier and having better lives than I am': the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012;15:117-121.
25.
Batchelor R, Bobrowicz A, Mackenzie R, Milne A: Challenges of ethical and legal responsibilities when technologies' uses and users change: social networking sites, decision-making capacity and dementia. Ethics Inf Technol 2012;14:99-108.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.